Author: chris

SOSC2560A: IDEOLOGY AND EVERYDAY LIFE
FALL/WINTER 2012-2013

ESSAY 2

LENGTH: 5 PAGES MAXIMUM
DOUBLE SPACED
FONT: TIMES NEW ROMAN, SIZE: 12

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Use ONLY course readings. Provide proper citations in standard MLA format.
A paper containing any information from the internet will receive a grade of zero.
__________________________________________________________________________________________

PAPER TOPIC

Both Nietzsche and Freud present a psychology of the individual along with an understanding of the relation of the individual to society. Examine a few key ideas that show Freud’s understanding of the mind and his understanding of the relation of the individual to society relying on Introductory Lectures On Psychoanalysis and Civilization and Its Discontents. Do the same with Nietzsche with reference to a maximum of three aphorisms from The Gay Science. Establish a conclusion that presents an integration of both authors in an understanding of how the relation of mind and social order leads to a critique of society.

Further clarification:
– rely on a few key sections from Freud and no more than three aphorisms from Nietzsche
– maintain a focus throughout the paper on the understanding of mind and social order.
– again, no use of any other sources in the paper
– as in the first essay, there is no “right” selection of material from the texts, but some ideas are more useful than
others for this topic
-develop a clear thesis/argument in the paper, do not just summarize Freud’s and Nietzsche’s ideas

 

Write an informative essay in which you make and support an assertion about the topic (the point that information you provide illustrates), articulate the experiences or research that establish your authority on the topic and communicate to your readers the ways in which your topic affect him personally. Use the additional document to ensure it meets all requirements

 

Title:	+ Imaginative title piques reader curiosity √ Appropriate original title – No title or inappropriate title (name of assignment/topic of essay)
Thesis:	+ Thesis makes a significant or compelling assertion about the topic √ Thesis identifies and makes an assertion about the topic – Thesis does not identify or does not make an assertion about the topic/Missing thesis statement
Essay Unity:	+ Essay maintains a consistent focus on one topic √ Essay maintains a general focus on one topic – Essay organization around a central idea seems weak/Essay as a whole lacks unity or coherence
Paragraph Unity:	+ Paragraphs maintain a consistent focus on one topic √ Paragraphs maintain a general focus on one topic – One or more paragraphs lack unity
Organization of ideas:	+ Organization of ideas captures and maintains reader’s attention √ Ideas are presented in a logical order – One or more ideas seem out of place/difficult to follow
Use of transitions:	+ Use of transitions creates a seamless progression of ideas √ Effective use of transitions – Ineffective or inappropriate use of transitions
Development of ideas:	+ Development of ideas aids in the reader’s understanding of main points √ Adequate development of ideas – Insufficient development of ideas
Relevance of ideas:	+Relevance/significance of each idea is explained in depth √ Minimal explanation of relevance/significance of ideas – Insufficient explanation of relevance/significance of ideas
Sentence structure:	+ Sentence variety contributes to reader interest √ No noticeable errors in sentence structure – Noticeable errors in sentence structure (fragments, run-ons, comma splices, garbled sentences)
Formal style:	+ Style is consistently formal without exception √ Style is generally formal, with few exceptions – Style is generally informal, non-standard, or unintelligible
Clarity of expression:	+ Expression of ideas is exceptionally clear and concise/No vague expressions √ Expression of ideas is generally clear and concise/Few vague expressions – Expression of ideas is generally vague/Several noticeable vague expressions
Usage:	+ Usage articulates writer’s experience in the subject area/Competent with use of relevant terminology √ Usage demonstrates basic knowledge in the subject area/Appropriate use of relevant terminology – Noticeable errors in usage/Gratuitous, awkward, or inappropriate use of relevant terminology
Spelling/ Grammar/ Mechanics:	+ No noticeable errors in spelling, grammar, or mechanics √ Few noticeable errors in spelling, grammar, or mechanics – Not edited/Several noticeable errors in spelling, grammar, or mechanics (negates 3 √’s)
Manuscript appearance/MLA format:	+ Professional manuscript appearance/No deviations from MLA format conventions √ Academic manuscript appearance/No more than one deviation from MLA format conventions – Non-standard manuscript appearance/More than one deviation from MLA format conventions/Improper citation of sources (negates 3 √’s)
Specific assignment requirements:	+ Demonstrates originality or complexity of thought/imagination (and see below) √ Fulfills all assignment requirements (incl. logos, ethos, pathos) – Fails to meet all specific assignment requirements
	Total points (one point for each check mark)
	+1 point: A commendable performance (all checks, 1-3 plusses) +2 points: A remarkable performance (all checks, 4-6 plusses) +3 points: An exceptional performance (all checks, 7-9 plusses) +4 points: An outstanding performance (all checks, 10-12 plusses) +5 points: A phenomenal performance (all checks, 13-15 plusses)
Score	20=A+, 19=A, 18=A-, 17=B, 16=B-, 15=C, 14=C-, 13=D, 12=D-, 0-11=F

 

 

CJUS  Research Methods

Directions & Information on Research Project

 

Possible Points Earned: 100 points

What is expected:

• Title page
• Abstract page
• Introduction
• Literature Review (2-3 pages long)
• Methodology section (includes survey, observation, & interview)
• Observations & Findings
• Discussion & Conclusion
• Reference page
• Appendices

 

Format: APA Format

Recommended Steps to Follow:

STEP 1: Develop research topic→research question→research hypothesis.

STEP 2: Begin literature review using reliable resources (the same action you take to complete a research paper in other classes). Reliable resources can include books (not textbooks), journal articles, and other dependable sources (not Wikipedi).

STEP 3: Prepare your survey and interview questions. Determine how & what you will view as your observation. Explain how this will all be done; this will be your methodology section of your project.

STEP 4: Conduct survey. Conduct interviews. Conduct observation.

STEP 5: Compile and write up your findings. This will be the observations & findings sections.

STEP 6: Determine if you can answer your research question with the data you gathered. Are they what you expected? Did you have findings that surprised you? This will be the discussion & conclusion section.

STEP 5: Type & Proofread: begin typing ASAP; do not wait until the night before to start.

STEP 6: Submit the Paper on Time on MOODLE: All papers must be submitted to me by the date and time listed above; if not, point loss (10%/day) as mentioned in the syllabus begins. There will be a drop box opened on Moodle for you to submit…You also must submit a hard copy on the day it is due.

 

Other Notes:

 Can use textbooks & Wikipedia only as a guide to other resources

 Depending on your topic, you may not be able to perform a real observation (e.g. Death penalty)…instead we will use a ‘quasi’ approach. For instance, you can watch a video on capital punishment. Or, say you cannot conduct interviews with child protection agents; instead, your classmates will play the role of the agents. It may not be the real thing, but it will at least give you a look into how these procedures are conducted.

 APA…100% required

 TurnItIn.com will be used so please (for your sake) do not copy

 Early submission of papers is welcomed and preferred, but not required

 Late submission means delayed grading

 

 

 

That order have two different subject. The subject # 1 have to be one page 1page. The subject # 2 have to be 1 page also. no sources needed ( no references needed)

Subject # 1 have to be one page

Mentoring Reflection (Critical Reflection Clinical Mentoring)
If you have developed a relationship with your mentor, write about how your mentor has affected your attitude and professionalism. If you have not met your mentor yet or developed a relationship with your mentor, choose a person who has taken the time and effort to help shape your professional growth. How did the mentor change how you think, how you feel, how you practice nursing, etc.?

Subject # 2 have to be one page

Role modeling Reflection (Critical Reflection Clinical 3 Role Model)
What nurse in clinical has served as a role model for you? What did (does) the person do that influenced the way you study, learn, practice nursing, think, believe, etc. How has that person inspired you?

hat order have two different subject. The subject # 1 have to be one page 1 page. The subject # 2 have to be 1 page also.

Subject # 1 have to be one page

Mentoring Reflection (Critical Reflection Clinical Mentoring)
If you have developed a relationship with your mentor, write about how your mentor has affected your attitude and professionalism. If you have not met your mentor yet or developed a relationship with your mentor, choose a person who has taken the time and effort to help shape your professional growth. How did the mentor change how you think, how you feel, how you practice nursing, etc.?

Subject # 2 have to be one page

Role modeling Reflection (Critical Reflection Clinical 3 Role Model)
What nurse in clinical has served as a role model for you? What did (does) the person do that influenced the way you study, learn, practice nursing, think, believe, etc. How has that person inspired you?

Counselors sometimes face tough decisions for which there is not always a clear answer. Consider, for example, a case in which a client reports that he or she has intentions to harm another person. What course of action should the counselor take? Should the counselor warn the potential victim and ignore the principle of counselor-client confidentiality?

In cases such as this, it is imperative that counselors refer to the ACA Code of Ethics as well as to state laws, regulations, and statutes. If ethical guidelines are unclear, or if state laws, regulations, or statutes do not address the issue, counselors should consult with knowledgeable colleagues in order to make an ethically and legally sound decision.

In this paper, you will review a case study and explain the course of action you might take as a counselor to report, warn, and/or protect, based on the ACA Code of Ethics and your own state’s laws, regulations, and/or statutes.

Review the article, “Tarasoff and the Duty to Protect.” Think about the various legal cases discussed and how the outcomes of these cases may inform your practice as a counselor.

• Review the ACA Code of Ethics and consider the guidelines related to the duty to protect clients and others from harm.

Write an explanation of how you might respond to the situation presented in the case study you selected. Justify your response by citing specific ethical guidelines and state laws, regulations, and/or statutes associated with the duty to report, warn, and/or protect.

IMPORTANT: In addition to the Tarasoff article, I am also sending you a document that has comments made by other students and professors regarding this very case study. Please read them and follow the same decision they made, just word it differently. Also, be sure to make specific references to the ACA Code of Ethics.

Each essay will be a description of a personal experience (or an observation you made of someone else) that illustrates or exemplifies one of the social psychology phenomena covered in the chapters. Each essay is to be typed and double-spaced, use a 12-point font, and have one-inch margins. Be sure to include the specific chapter and page number where the concept you discuss is explained in the text. Two separate essays are required.

The NYU Committee on Graduate Admissions does not grant interviews, so the personal statement is your only opportunity to highlight aspects of yourself that are not immediately apparent from your application documents. Due to the 500-word limit, it might be helpful to focus on the following points in crafting your personal statement: your professional interests or goals, qualifications, and reasons for applying to your desired program.

1. Describe the different types if messianic movements and personalities, paying particular  attention to the dynamics as manifested in both the Unification Church as well as Islam.
2. Apply Clifford Geertz’s description of religion as a cultural system of symbols to cults

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Finalizing and Submitting Your Capstone Project

For this assignment you will finalize all chapters, assemble all components of your capstone project, and submit it to your mentor.

Be certain to revise all chapters based on feedback you have received from your mentor and classmates.

Your project should have the components listed below and they should be arranged in the same order. Consult the explanations given for guidance regarding what information to include under each of these components.

● Title page

Be sure to list the title of your capstone project, your name, your mentor’s name, the course code and name, your section number, and the date.

● Abstract

The abstract is a brief summary of your project. It should be no more than 350 words. It should briefly state the problem you have investigated, indicate the methodology you used to research the problem, and discuss your results. See Developing an Abstract at: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0U9Bi_H6FPJTk83MW5yT0hmMkU/edit?usp=sharing.

● Contents page

● List of tables and figures (applicable only if you have tables and/or figures)

● Chapters (1-5)

You will need to finalize chapters 1-3, then arrange all five of your chapters in the following order:

○ Introduction

○ Literature Review

○ Methodology

○ Results of the Study or Creative Project

○ Summary and Discussion

● References or Works Cited

Use APA format for social science studies and MLA format for literary studies. Be sure you are consistent in your use of format.

● Appendices

(only if applicable) NOTE: Appendices do not count towards the number of pages in your paper. See Creating and Working with Appendices, available at: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0U9Bi_H6FPJMHJ2ZzA1SWVqZms/edit?usp=sharing.

Remember, your paper is to be a scholarly report written in Standard Academic English and with appropriate documentation. It should be a minimum of 25-pages in length. Before submitting your work thoroughly proofread and revise.

Review the Final Project Evaluation Rubric link as you put the finishing touches on your paper, available at: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0U9Bi_H6FPJck9xbUdmRFNJOHM/edit?usp=sharing