Complete this essay in a Microsoft Word document, with a minimum of 17 pages pages in length, not including the Cover Page, Table of Contents and References Page (please use at least 8 scholarly references to research your paper).,APA formatted and 5% similarity.

Complete this essay in a Microsoft Word document, with a minimum of 17 pages pages in length, not including the Cover Page, Table of Contents and References Page (please use at least 8 scholarly references to research your paper).,APA formatted and 5% similarity.

 

The research paper and final project will consist of a case study analysis of a company of your choice (WalMart). The research must offer a business overview of the company, their Ideation phase, how they went from Ideation Stage (Start Up) and moved through the Survival Stage (Vally of Death) and on to the Growth and Expansion stages, if applicable. Discussion should include how the organization was formed and what is their organizational structure. The analysis should examine the management philosophy of innovation, culture and the reasons why the company has become so successful. The study must investigate the innovations introduced by the management and what strategies were used to make the company efficient and competitive within the industry.  This study should also look at the innovations implemented by the ownership/management team and what methods and strategies were used to create a sustainable competitive advantage. The case study should also explain the role of entrepreneurship in the development of the company and the fundamental reasons behind their success. Spend some time explain the business model.

 

Identified for your Scholar-Practitioner Project in the context of similar national and international data in developing a community health profile summary.

As a public health professional, it is likely that you will be asked to gather quantitative data to develop a community health profile. Community health profiles include data on information such as morbidity and mortality rate, population size, and other characteristics. This information is most accurately depicted though quantitative data in a community health profile.

In this Assignment, you look at the community public health problem you identified for your Scholar-Practitioner Project in the context of similar national and international data in developing a community health profile summary.

The Assignment (4-5 pages):

Submit 4-5 pages community health profile for your Scholar-Practitioner Project. Include a summary of the following:

  • Recent local, state, and regional quantitative sociodemographic, morbidity, and mortality data
  • Recent national or international quantitative  sociodemographic, morbidity, and mortality data
  • Recent local, state, and regional quantitative data related to one factor contributing to the identified problem
  • The relevancy of these findings to the problem you identified

By completing this assignment, please focus on demonstrating your research, analysis, citation and writing skills over format of the brief.

Review the fact pattern provided below. At this time, Mr. Kant stands convicted of either petit larceny or shoplifting, as dictated by your state statutes, and your office has been hired to handle the appeal. Based on your lessons and reading material regarding legal analysis and writing, legal research, legal citation and appellate procedure, prepare the appellate brief based on relevant statutory and case law from your state of residence. Proper format is outlined in Statsky on pages 600-602, and detailed in your state court rules, formbooks, etc.

Thoroughly research the issues involved and address the statute/s from your state under which Mr. Kant would be charged and convicted. Locate at least one binding opinion upon which to base your arguments and apply the opinion in a thorough and concise manner. You should also apply any relevant secondary authority that might be used in support of your arguments. In completing this assignment, please focus on demonstrating your research, analysis, citation and writing skills over format of the brief.

Bear in mind that you do not have access to the trial court record for this assignment, which would not be the case in an actual law office setting. Therefore, you may embellish the facts as necessary to fully develop your arguments. Use care, however, not to allow those embellishments to change the issues involved.

FACTS: Sam Kant, stands convicted of shoplifting/petit larceny (as dictated by your state statutes) from Bilmart, a national department store. At his wife’s request, Mr. Kant went to Bilmart on Wednesday, ______, 20___, and purchased a case of six 4 oz. cans of Hoover’s Baked Beans with Bacon. Upon returning home, his wife chastised him for once again failing to purchase what she had requested. Apparently, Mrs. Kant can’t stand the taste of Hoover’s Beans, but is very fond of the Handell’s brand, and was planning to serve them to her book club when she hosted them for lunch the following afternoon. Mrs. Kant ordered her husband to return to Bilmart to exchange the Hoover’s beans for Handell’s Beans.

Upon arrival at the store early the next morning, Mr. Kant found that the line for customer service was extremely long due to Bilmart’s annual sponsorship of a major community food drive. In an effort to save time, and thinking the line might be shorter upon his return, Mr. Kant placed the case of Hoover’s beans into a shopping cart, made his way through the store to the bean shelf, and then added the Handell’s beans to the cart. However, upon his return, the line had not diminished and it was obvious that Sam would be waiting a considerable amount of time to formalize the exchange. Fearing the wrath of his wife should he not return in time for lunch, Sam placed the case of Hoover’s beans inside a cart filled with what appeared to be merchandise returns in need of re-stocking. With the desired Handell’s beans in the shopping cart, Mr. Kant then proceeded to the store’s exit. As he neared the doors, Mr. Kant was approached and detained by store security, who witnessed Sam’s actions, and police were called to the store. Apparently, the cart into which Sam had placed the Hoover’s Beans did not contain returned items to be shelved, but rather, donations to the Bilmart Community Food Drive. Officers Kopp and Slickman questioned Mr. Kant and then cited him for Shoplifting.

Highlight branches of Government.

  1. Branches of Government:
    1. Provide a topic sentence that briefly describes one strength and one weakness of one branch of our government:  Executive, Legislative, or Judiciary.
    2. Provide a topic sentence that recommends one option to maintain the strength and one to correct the weakness.

 

    1. Scholarly Support: (For assistance with your research see the Tutorials provided by the APA Style Aid, and Annotated Bibliographies
  1. Provide two credible sources in APA format to support your main points.
    1. Briefly discuss how these sources support your main points.
    2. Briefly evaluate your sources for bias, validity, and reliability.

 

Identifying the risks, you should provide some details on how you plan to manage that risk.

At this point you have identified the organization and the deficient process, created a proposal for a new process, and determined the needed resources and your budget. You will now conduct a risk assessment based on this information. What can go wrong when integrating the process? You might consider conflicts between stakeholders. Not everyone will agree with new process. Does your organization have a change management policy or process? If not, what is the risk of proceeding with integrating the new process? Consider this and more as you perform your risk assessment.

After identifying the risks, you should provide some details on how you plan to manage that risk. For instance, if the risk is a lack of a change management system, then you could provide a strategy to effectively implement the new process without a formal system.

This paper should:

  • Be 3 to 4 pages in length.
  • Be supported by research.
  • Identify the risks associated with the new process.
  • Include a plan to overcome these risks.
  • Include an explanation as to how you plan to use your chosen management theories in order to manage the identified risks of implementing the new process.

Consider the results that different theories have and whether or not your chosen theory has the most effective approach.

Briefly discuss how these sources support your main points.

Develop a detailed outline of your third main point.

 

  1. Branches of Government:

 

    1. Provide a topic sentence that briefly describes one strength and one weakness of one branch of our government:  Executive, Legislative, or Judiciary.
    2. Provide a topic sentence that recommends one option to maintain the strength and one to correct the weakness.

 

    1. Scholarly Support: (For assistance with your research see the Tutorials provided by the APA Style Aid, and Annotated Bibliographies
  1. Provide two credible sources in APA format to support your main points.
    1. Briefly discuss how these sources support your main points.
    2. Briefly evaluate your sources for bias, validity, and reliability.

 

Identify the risks, you should provide some details on how you plan to manage that risk.

At this point you have identified the organization and the deficient process, created a proposal for a new process, and determined the needed resources and your budget. You will now conduct a risk assessment based on this information. What can go wrong when integrating the process? You might consider conflicts between stakeholders. Not everyone will agree with new process. Does your organization have a change management policy or process? If not, what is the risk of proceeding with integrating the new process? Consider this and more as you perform your risk assessment.

After identifying the risks, you should provide some details on how you plan to manage that risk. For instance, if the risk is a lack of a change management system, then you could provide a strategy to effectively implement the new process without a formal system.

This paper should:

  • Be 3 to 4 pages in length.
  • Be supported by research.
  • Identify the risks associated with the new process.
  • Include a plan to overcome these risks.
  • Include an explanation as to how you plan to use your chosen management theories in order to manage the identified risks of implementing the new process.

Consider the results that different theories have and whether or not your chosen theory has the most effective approach.

 

E-Cigarettes Regulation.

What is a Health Policy Paper?
• The issue addressed should be a legitimate contemporary health policy issue within which the current policy is clearly discernible.
• There should be clear alternatives to the current policy.
• There must be sufficient data present to provide the target audience (i.e. the decision-maker) with information to make a decision on the policy proposal.

Format for the Policy Paper
Below are the guidelines for writing a policy paper. Some variation may occur depending on the topic of the paper and the research methods being used. Policy papers should be approximately 8 pages in length.

Executive Summary (.5-1page in length)
At the beginning of the paper explain who the target audience is (i.e., the decision-maker for your policy proposal) and the main points that the decision-maker should know. It may be best to write this section last because it will serve as a summary of the entire paper.
At a minimum, the summary should include the following:
1. A statement of current policy
2. Reasons for initiating changes
3. Policy options to be considered
4. Pros and cons of each option
5. Recommended course of action
6. Reasoning for selecting that course of action

Body of Paper
The main portion of the paper should be dedicated to establishing the background and discussing the reasoning behind the policy recommendation. Students should include all of the basics from the executive summary, but fully elaborate on each point that the paper is making. The following is an outline describing what the main body of the paper should include.
Overview / Background
• Statement of purpose – Why is the decision-maker being asked to consider a policy change at this time?
• Review the Current Policy – What are we currently doing, why are we doing it this way, what is the public’s perception of the policy? Assess how well it is or is not working.
• Statement on the Necessity for Change – What circumstances (e.g., changes in government, leadership, stability, etc.) have changed that make a new approach advisable or necessary?
Discussion
• Discuss the alternatives to the current policy option by enumerating and explaining each policy option in turn.
• Pros and cons of each policy option should be discussed next. Identify the political, economic, and security implications for each option. Each policy option should be compared and contrasted to the other options as well as to the current policy. This is the most important part of the paper.
Recommendation
• Clearly identify which option will be recommended and which options will be discounted.
• Clearly lay out the argument for why that option is better than each of the others.
Implementation
• Write a detailed recommendation for specific steps on how and when to implement the recommended policy option.

Viable Alternatives
Policy papers must present several policy alternatives, and they must be serious alternatives. As a general rule, three options should be presented. One serious alternative will often be to maintain the status quo.

Cost-benefit analysis
Policy papers should include a clear cost-benefit analysis. The student should be certain to think through all possible outcomes clearly and thoroughly. The cost-benefit analysis should seriously consider the feasibility of implementation, not only in terms of economic or strategic implications, but also in terms of political feasibility. Moreover, the analysis of likely effects must not be completely one-sided. There are always going to be some benefits and some costs to any policy proposal.

Clear Criteria
Students should present clear criteria for evaluating the problem at hand and the policy alternatives to be considered. This will involve prioritizing among a variety of possible values. Trade-offs are the heart of the policy process – if solutions were easy or obvious, the problem would not be around for the student to analyze.

Clear predictions
What are the likely result of the proposed policy option? Be specific and reasonably detailed. What level of certainty can one have about them? And what middle-run indicators would demonstrate success?

Health Policy Topics:
Food Safety Policies
GMO’s
Healthcare-associated infection
Death with Dignity
E-Cigarettes regulation
Mental Health coverage, Mental Health Parity Act
Ninety-Day Grace Period- ACA 90 day grace period before an insurer can discontinue someone’s coverage for failure to pay a monthly premium.
Ideas (Health Policy Briefs, www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/archives)

What is Not a Policy Paper?
• An historical analysis is never an appropriate topic for a policy paper. A policy paper must focus on a current policy issue. For example, an analysis of what George W. Bush should or should not have done in 2001 would work well as a research paper, but it would not be acceptable as a policy paper.
• Comparative or case studies normally fit better as research papers than policy papers. For example, a comparative study of conflict resolution in South Africa and Northern Ireland, although certainly providing an analysis with contemporary relevance, would work far better as a research than a policy paper.

Explain what is a Health Policy Paper.

What is a Health Policy Paper?
• The issue addressed should be a legitimate contemporary health policy issue within which the current policy is clearly discernible.
• There should be clear alternatives to the current policy.
• There must be sufficient data present to provide the target audience (i.e. the decision-maker) with information to make a decision on the policy proposal.

Format for the Policy Paper
Below are the guidelines for writing a policy paper. Some variation may occur depending on the topic of the paper and the research methods being used. Policy papers should be approximately 8 pages in length.

Executive Summary (.5-1page in length)
At the beginning of the paper explain who the target audience is (i.e., the decision-maker for your policy proposal) and the main points that the decision-maker should know. It may be best to write this section last because it will serve as a summary of the entire paper.
At a minimum, the summary should include the following:
1. A statement of current policy
2. Reasons for initiating changes
3. Policy options to be considered
4. Pros and cons of each option
5. Recommended course of action
6. Reasoning for selecting that course of action

Body of Paper
The main portion of the paper should be dedicated to establishing the background and discussing the reasoning behind the policy recommendation. Students should include all of the basics from the executive summary, but fully elaborate on each point that the paper is making. The following is an outline describing what the main body of the paper should include.
Overview / Background
• Statement of purpose – Why is the decision-maker being asked to consider a policy change at this time?
• Review the Current Policy – What are we currently doing, why are we doing it this way, what is the public’s perception of the policy? Assess how well it is or is not working.
• Statement on the Necessity for Change – What circumstances (e.g., changes in government, leadership, stability, etc.) have changed that make a new approach advisable or necessary?
Discussion
• Discuss the alternatives to the current policy option by enumerating and explaining each policy option in turn.
• Pros and cons of each policy option should be discussed next. Identify the political, economic, and security implications for each option. Each policy option should be compared and contrasted to the other options as well as to the current policy. This is the most important part of the paper.
Recommendation
• Clearly identify which option will be recommended and which options will be discounted.
• Clearly lay out the argument for why that option is better than each of the others.
Implementation
• Write a detailed recommendation for specific steps on how and when to implement the recommended policy option.

Viable Alternatives
Policy papers must present several policy alternatives, and they must be serious alternatives. As a general rule, three options should be presented. One serious alternative will often be to maintain the status quo.

Cost-benefit analysis
Policy papers should include a clear cost-benefit analysis. The student should be certain to think through all possible outcomes clearly and thoroughly. The cost-benefit analysis should seriously consider the feasibility of implementation, not only in terms of economic or strategic implications, but also in terms of political feasibility. Moreover, the analysis of likely effects must not be completely one-sided. There are always going to be some benefits and some costs to any policy proposal.

Clear Criteria
Students should present clear criteria for evaluating the problem at hand and the policy alternatives to be considered. This will involve prioritizing among a variety of possible values. Trade-offs are the heart of the policy process – if solutions were easy or obvious, the problem would not be around for the student to analyze.

Clear predictions
What are the likely result of the proposed policy option? Be specific and reasonably detailed. What level of certainty can one have about them? And what middle-run indicators would demonstrate success?

Health Policy Topics:
Food Safety Policies
GMO’s
Healthcare-associated infection
Death with Dignity
E-Cigarettes regulation
Mental Health coverage, Mental Health Parity Act
Ninety-Day Grace Period- ACA 90 day grace period before an insurer can discontinue someone’s coverage for failure to pay a monthly premium.
Ideas (Health Policy Briefs, www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/archives)

What is Not a Policy Paper?
• An historical analysis is never an appropriate topic for a policy paper. A policy paper must focus on a current policy issue. For example, an analysis of what George W. Bush should or should not have done in 2001 would work well as a research paper, but it would not be acceptable as a policy paper.
• Comparative or case studies normally fit better as research papers than policy papers. For example, a comparative study of conflict resolution in South Africa and Northern Ireland, although certainly providing an analysis with contemporary relevance, would work far better as a research than a policy paper.

Discuss Frack balance sheet on June 12, 2015,

On June 1, 2015, Frack Corp. sold merchandise with a list price of $5,000 to Floopy on account. Frack allowed trade discounts of 30%. Credit terms were 2/15, n/40 and the sale was made FOB shipping point. Frack prepaid $200 of delivery costs for Floopy as an accommodation. On June 12, 2015, Frack received from Floopy a remittance in full payment. Prepare the general journal entries (without explanations) for Frack to record the events. Frack uses the periodic method for sales and gross method for sales discounts.
General Journal:
Date Account Debit Credit

Question 2 (14 points)

A client, Floppy Co., sells lawn mowers and garden tillers. The garden tillers are purchased from Badly Built LLC and sold to customers without modification. The lawn mowers, however, are purchased from several contractors. Floppy then makes ongoing design refinements to the mowers before selling them to customers.

The lawn mowers cost $200. Floppy then makes the design refinements at a cost of $85 per lawn mower. Floppy stores the lawn mowers in its own warehouse and sells them directly to retailers at a list price of $500. Floppy uses the FIFO inventory method. Approximately two-thirds of new lawn mower sales involve trade-ins. For each used lawn mower traded in and returned to Floppy, retailers receive a $40 allowance regardless of whether the trade-in was associated with a sale of a year 2 or year 3 model. Floppy’s net realizable value on a used lawn mower averages $25.
At December 31, year 2, Floppy’s inventory of new lawn mowers includes both year 2 and year 3 models. When the year 3 model was introduced in September year 2, the list price of the remaining year 2 model lawn mowers was reduced below cost. Floppy is experiencing rising costs.

Floppy has contacted your firm for advice on how to report the carrying value of inventory, the impact of the decline in value on the year 2 models, and the effects of using the FIFO method on their December 31, year 2 financial statements.

All freight bills are paid directly to the freight companies.
Floppy had the following information regarding the garden tiller inventory for the fiscal year ended December 31, Y2:
Purchases $210,000
Purchase discounts 38,000
Purchase returns 17,500
Freight-in 12,100
Freight-out 18,000
Beginning inventory 42,900
Ending inventory 34,250
Prepare a Schedule of Cost of Goods Sold for the fiscal year ended December 31, Y2:
Question 3 (14 points)

Flim Co. sells one product, which it purchases from various suppliers. Flim’s trial balance at December 31, year 2, included the following accounts:
Sales (33,000 units @ $16) $528,000
Sales discounts 7,500
Purchases 368,900
Purchase discounts 18,000
Freight-in 5,000
Freight-out 11,000

Flim Co.’s inventory purchases during year 2 were as follows:
Date Units Cost per Unit Total Cost
Beginning inventory, January 1 8,000 $8.20 $65,600
Purchases, quarter ended March 31 12,000 8.25 99,000
Purchases, quarter ended June 30 15,000 7.90 118,500
Purchases, quarter ended September 30 13,000 7.50 97,500
Purchases, quarter ended December 31 7,000 7.70 53,900
Total 55,000 $434,500
Additional information:
Flim’s accounting policy is to report inventory in its financial statements at the lower of cost or market, applied to total inventory. Cost is determined under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.

Flim has determined that, at December 31 year 2, the replacement cost of its inventory was $8 per unit and the net realizable value was $8.80 per unit. Flim’s normal profit margin is $1.05 per unit.
From this information, complete the following schedules.
Part a.
SUPPORTING SCHEDULE OF ENDING INVENTORY
December 31, Year 2
Inventory at cost (LIFO) Units Cost per Unit Total Cost

Part b.
Part b:
Flim Company
Schedule of Cost of Goods Sold
For the Year Ended December 31, Y2
Beginning Inventory
Purchases
Less: Purchase Discounts
Purchase Returns
Net Purchases
Plus: Freight-in
Goods Available for Sale
Ending Inventory
Cost of Goods Sold

Question 4
The following information pertains to Frack Corp.’s 2015 cost of goods sold:

Inventory, 12/31/14 $ 90,000
2015 purchases 134,000
2015 write-off of obsolete inventory 24,000
Inventory, 12/31/15 30,000
The inventory written off became obsolete due to an unexpected and unusual technological advance by a competitor. In its 2015 income statement, what amount should Frack report as cost of goods sold?

Question 5
On December 15, 2015, Frack purchased goods costing $100,000. The terms were FOB shipping point. Costs incurred by Frack in connection with the purchase and delivery of the goods were as follows:
Normal freight charges $3,000
Handling costs 2,000
Insurance on shipment 200
Abnormal freight charges for express shipping 1,500
The goods were received on December 17, 2015. What is the amount that Frack should charge to:
a. inventory
b. current period expense

Question 6
Flip Co. adopted the dollar-value LIFO inventory method as of January 1, 2015. A single inventory pool and an internally computed price index are used to compute Flip’s LIFO inventory layers. Information about Flip’s dollar value inventory follows:

Inventory

Date At base year cost At dollar value LIFO
1/1/14 $90,000 $90,000
2014 layer 20,000 30,000
2015 layer 40,000 80,000

What were the price indexes used to compute Flip’s: (Round all values to one decimal place.)
a. 2014 dollar value LIFO inventory layer
b. 2015 dollar value LIFO inventory layer
Question 7
Flip Company’s usual sales terms are net sixty days, FOB shipping point. Sales, net of returns and allowances, totaled $2,300,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, before year-end adjustments. Additional data are as follows:

>> On December 27, 2015, Flip authorized a customer to return, for full credit, goods shipped and billed at $80,000 on December 15, 2015. The returned goods were received by Flip on January 4, 2016, and a $80,000 credit memo was issued and recorded on the same date.

>> Goods with an invoice amount of $50,000 were billed and recorded on January 3, 2016. The goods were shipped on December 30, 2015.

>> Goods with an invoice amount of $100,000 were billed and recorded on December 30, 2015. The goods were shipped on January 3, 2016.

Flip’ adjusted net sales for 2015 should be?

Question 8
Flip Co.’s accounts payable balance at December 31, 2015, was $2,200,000 before considering the following data:

>> Goods shipped to Flip FOB shipping point on December 22, 2015, were lost in transit. The invoice cost of $40,000 was not recorded by Flip. On January 7, 2016, Flip filed a $40,000 claim against the common carrier.

>> Goods shipped to Flip FOB destination on December 20, 2015, were received on January 6, 2016. The invoice cost was $50,000.

What amount should Flip report as accounts payable in its December 31, 2015 balance sheet?
Question 9
Flip Co.’s inventory at December 31, 2015, was $1,500,000 based on a physical count priced at cost, and before any necessary adjustment for the following:

>> Merchandise costing $90,000, shipped FOB shipping point from a vendor on December 30, 2015, was received and recorded on January 5, 2016.

>> Goods in the shipping area were excluded from inventory although shipment was not made until January 4, 2016. The goods, billed to the customer FOB destination on December 30, 2015, had a cost of $120,000.

What amount should Flip report as inventory in its December 31, 2015 balance sheet?

Question 10
On January 1, 2016, Flip, Inc. contracted with the city of Bigger to provide custom built desks for the city schools. The contract made Flip the city’s sole supplier and required Flip to supply no less than 4,000 desks and no more than 5,500 desks per year for two years. In turn, Bigger agreed to pay a fixed price of $105 per desk. During 2016, Flip produced 5,000 desks for Bigger. At December 31, 2016, 2,500 of these desks were segregated from the regular inventory and were accepted and awaiting pickup by Bigger. Bigger paid Flip $450,000 during 2016. What amount should Flip recognize as contract revenue in 2016?