Author: chris

Your 1-page write-up should answer the following questions from the 3 areas below. If you would like, you can simply copy and paste your assessment results at the end of your write-up.1. What did you learn about yourself from the self-assessment? Were you surprised at the results? Do you agree with them? Why or why not? Based on what you have learned from the assessment, is there any changes you would like to make? If so, explain how you might accomplish your goals.2. Think about how your results (e.g. score or style) might compare to others’ assessment results. Summarize some differences that would likely exist between those who would score differently than you on this assessment. For example, if someone rated their values as opposite to yours (or received a different score than you did on the personality assessment), how might they behave differently? How can you effectively interact with others who would have different scores than you on this assessment?3. Give a real-life example of how you have personally experienced the effects (of the issues addressed in the self-assessment) of these differences. If you cannot think of a personal experience, how have you observed the effects in other people’s interactions? Please explicitly list the style or issue from the self assessment that you are illustrating. How have or could these issues affect you in your job?****Attached is an online survey result I had completed. Please use the report to write the essay. Thank you.

Dissertation Topic: Currently, the world is facing cyber crimes, especially public companies with weak internal services. One resolution is to strengthen internal services that complies with Sarbanes-Oxley 2002 through corporate social responsibility.Needs to include these headings:Introduction : 2 pages (max)BackgroundStatement of Problem: 250-300 wordsPurpose of StudyTheoretical Framework: 1. Discussion reflects a thorough discussion of the conceptual and/or theoretical area under which the research falls and how the proposed research fits within other research in the field. Discussion clearly considers the study theoreticalassumptions and principles, and specifically includes important issues, perspectives, and, if appropriate, controversies in the field.2. Discussion reflects knowledge of and familiarity with both the historical and current literature. The majority of sources must be scholarly and peer-reviewed.Research QuestionsHypothesisNature of StudySignificance of StudyDefinition of Key TermsLiterature Review: (Biggest portion) The literature review will contain several sub-headings that will be specific to the dissertation. Approximately 85% of references must be peer-reviewed, scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.Summary

Grove, Gray and Burns (2014) state that ‘frameworks for studies may come from grand nursing theories, middle range theories, research findings, non-nursing theories, tentative theories, and scientific theories” (p. 207). With this in mind, several examples of research with explicitly stated frameworks are provided in the reference list and linked on the course page. Select a study of interest.Initial Post: Discuss how the framework provided the logic or inspiration for approaching the research problem.Replies: Reply to peers that selected a different research study. Discuss if/how this framework could improve your nursing practice.Note: Be prepared to discuss your theoretical framework for your study next week. If you are not sure yet, you might explore some of the nursing theories summarized on the Current Nursing website in the reference list or the theories listed in Tables 7-3 and 7-4 of the textbook.]

Using the research study you selected in the Unit 2 assignment, along with the course assignments for which you deconstructed your research study, write a scientific merit paper. In your paper, address the following:•Evaluate how a research study advances the scientific knowledge base of an identified field of study.•Evaluate how a specific research study contributes to research theory and the field of study.•Evaluate how the scientific methods of inquiry are applied to a specific research study.•Evaluate the validity and reliability of a selected research study.•Assess strategies for addressing ethical concerns in the design of a research study.•Apply the terminology of research.•Demonstrate both the depth and the breadth of your understanding of scientific research and scientific merit by including relevant examples and supporting evidence.Requirements•The paper should be 5 pages long, not counting references, block quotes, or title page. Neither an abstract nor table of content is required, and would not count in the paper length.•Minimum of seven scholarly resources. It is expected that one of these resources will be the study you selected for the Unit 2 assignment, and another will be the required textbook for the course, by Leedy and Ormrod.

CSE STYLE – not MLA (I had to enter a choice to submit assignment and CSE WAS NOT AN OPTION) Visit the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) website at the EPA (http://epa.gov/triexplorer). cataloging the hazardous pollutants that have been released in your community (Mantoloking, New Jersey or Ocean County, New, Jersey). Do not use Palm Beach.Begin your paper by describing your community. Include demographics, geography, major industries. Insert a table listing the top ten pollutants released in the highest amount in the latest year for which data are available. Make your table in word processing software rather than a screenshot of the TRI website. If your community has fewer than ten releases, selecting county rather than ZIP code. This section, including your table, should be about one page in length.Pick one of these \”top ten\” chemicals to discuss in further detail. Describe the likely sources for its emission (this information can be gathered from the TRI website). What RfD (Reference Dose) and/or RfC (Reference Concentration) has been established for exposure to your compound, and what are the major uncertainties underlying its calculation? The Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) dataset on the EPA website are helpful (http://www.epa.gov/iris). Then, detail the route(s) of human exposure, linking back this information to pollutant release in your home community. describe your pollutant’s known and/or suspected human health effects. You must refer to peer-reviewed articles in discussing the health effects of your chosen chemical. Use PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed). It is required that you consult both toxicology and epidemiology research to detail a subset of your compound’s health effects. This section should be three-four pages in length.ADDITIONAL SUGGESTED SOURCES(http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/), (ATSDR), (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/)(http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/index.html)(http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/about/resources/faq/index.html)(http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/summaries/chronicstudies/index.html)STYLE & FORMATTINGUse name-year CSE style (http://www.scientificstyleandformat.org/Tools/SSF-Citation-Quick-Guide.html) both in-text with parenthetical citations and with a reference page. Final paper should be about 1100-1400 words (4-5 pages, excluding the reference page), be double-spaced, have one-inch margins, use standard professional font type, and use standard professional font size. Please include your name and include a title to your paper. It should also be written with stylistically correct grammar and punctuation. Submit your final paper as a word documentThis paper will be run through Turnitin before grading.ASSIGNMENT CHECKLIST̈ Paper submitted as a Word documenẗ Paper title included̈ Word count is 1100-1400 words̈ Paper is double-spaced̈ Margins are one-incḧ Font type is standard professional̈ Font size is standard professional̈ Hometown community is described̈ Top 10 pollutants provided in a tablë Table is NOT a screen shoẗ Likely sources of emission for compound of interest are listed̈ RfD/RfC for compound of interest listed along with associated uncertainties̈ Routes of exposure described̈ Exposure route is linked with exposure typefor your hometown̈ Known/suspected health effects forcompound of interest described̈ Both toxicology and epidemiology sourcesincluded when discussing health effects ̈ Sources are cited in-text using name-yearCSE stylë Reference page included, in CSE stylë Paper saved as Word document with propertitle formaẗ Turnitin report consulted for plagiarism,paper revised if necessary

This is for a class about theft, vandalism and forgery in the history of art. Write a summary and response based on the documentary \”The Mona Lisa Curse. Things to think about: Do you agree with Robert Hughes? Is there a distinct point of view in the film? Are all sides represented?Here is the link to the documentary : https://vimeo.com/62973616

For this assessment, you will be required to develop and thoroughly analyze a public policy in order to advocate for one that improves the health of the public and/or the nursing profession globally (local, state, national, or international). To do this, you will reflect on several aspects of being a policy maker within the nursing position. A few things to consider are:• Why did you select the health or nursing profession policy issue?• How does this issue affect nursing practice, healthcare delivery, and health outcomes for individual, families, and/or communities?• What are the values and the ethical positions that underpin your perspectives?• What are the criteria you will use to evaluate the success (outcomes) of your proposed policy change?By using both a top-down and a bottom-up approach, you will analyze and bring the nursing perspective to policy makers and stakeholders. Identifying the values and ethical perspectives that underpin your position, you will develop criteria to evaluate the success of your work. This will lead to a created a policy brief that can be sent to decision makers and created a plan to work with an organization/community to promote policy change at the local level.To guide you to your conclusion, using nursing research to support your position is vital. This should include principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR).Note: I have attaced a policy at my facility that does not meet all of CMS requirement. I made canges to it and attached that copy. I would this paper to analyse this policy and tie in the CMS guidelines. Please use online sources for references.Thank you

Compare and Contrast Critique of two different parenting styles

Draft a policy-making framework which a homeland security strategist/practitioner (you) would use to effectively analyze an issue. The goal here is to develop your own functional framework which you can use in thinking about homeland security issues. In developing your framework, it can be helpful to start with a series of questions such as: what is the context of the issue; what assumptions about the situation and the international/domestic environment can be made; how does this issue fit within the greater homeland security strategy; what are the priorities; who can/should do something about this issue; and how should they proceed? Include three to five traits from The Architecture of Leadership text that the homeland security practitioner needs to be mindful of in designing and using this policy-making framework. Then, apply that framework in a few paragraphs or a concise page to a recent or current homeland security issue or policy decision problem that you have identified in your daily readings or research.Below is the link for The Architecture of Leadership text:https://www.orau.gov/dhssummit/presentations/March17/Keynote_Loy_Mar17.pdf

The concept of economic growth and development. Types and factors of growth: extensive, intensive, etc. Factors of production: labour, capital and technology.