Author: chris

Program Evaluation of Woman in the US military and Opportunities Between 2009-2014.

TASK:Please compose a question (no more than 40 words) pertaining to your proposed area of research – whatever the subject: to fit on one metaphorical or literal “Post-It” note. Please post your draft question to the forum. Then read and review at least two of the other questions, whatever the subject, that have been posted by your fellow students.Remember:-You are at liberty to explore different ways of wording your question, and importantly, to \’change your mind\’.-Be prepared, go through a number of drafts and be prepared to re-write.-At this stage it will only be a \”working title\” – you will not be held to this further along the process.-This is just an exercise to begin to focus your thoughts.TIP: leave your Post-It note somewhere you can come across it frequently (on your homepage, on the fridge door, inside your notebook, on the edge of your monitor), so that you can ponder its merits every so often.RESPOND;Two things:-Firstly, please respond in the forum and provide constructive comments (in no more than 200 words) on at least two other questions: what did you like about them, what you didn’t, what you thought were its strengths, and, if there were, any weaknesses, and ultimately whether the question got you “thinking”.-Secondly, revisit your own question. Redraft it in light of your reflections on the other contributions.Compare your two drafts and see which you are most comfortable with (i.e. what could you explain to your friend without baffling or boring them).Remember:-Do not worry about not knowing things at this stage.-Equally, do not worry if you are unsure whether your question is worthwhile at this point. We will be providing help throughout the pre-proposal stage to the point you hand in your proposal to ensure you have a workable topic.You might also like to consult the following resource from Empire State College, State University of New York,http://www8.esc.edu/ESConline/Across_ESC/WritersComplex.nsf/ 3cc42a422514347a8525671d0049f395/f87fd7182f0ff21c852569c2005a47b7?OpenDocumentOUTCOME;You will have given some thought toward constructing a question, and judging its merits.

Please refer to the below orders 290045 & 290063

Explain whether there is a difference between the market and your own view, and how you could profitably take advantage of it.

Students will develop a scholarly paper addressing a healthcare delivery situation that needs change within the practice setting and how the master’s prepared nurse can facilitate intraprofessional collaboration and communication during the change process as a change agent.Assignment Criteria:1. Identify a healthcare delivery situation within the nurse’s current practice setting that needs change and provide background information.2. Select and discuss a leadership theory and/or change model that the master’s prepared nurse can apply to the health care delivery situation.3. Develop a proposed plan for change the master’s prepared nurse could initiate, provide rationale.4. Discuss strategies the master’s prepared nurse can utilize to initiate change and improve outcomes.5. Discuss the essential elements needed by a master’s prepared nurse leader to be an effective change agent.6. Discuss why the leadership role is an integral component for the mastered prepared nurse.7. Define intraprofessional collaboration and communication.a. Discuss the impact intraprofessional collaboration and communication has on the change process.b. Discuss how the master’s prepared nurse leader can facilitate intraprofessional communication and collaboration during the change process.c. Discuss barriers to and drivers of effective collaboration communication between interdisciplinary healthcare members.8. The scholarly paper should be five (5) to six (6) pages excluding the title and reference pages.9. Include level 1 and level 2 headings, an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion.10. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’).11. Include a minimum of three (3) references from professional peer-reviewed nursing journals to support the paper. References should be from scholarly peer-reviewed journals (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.12. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).

Journal Article Critique : Food SafetyYour discussion must be relevant to the journal article and must provide a scholarly critique of the contents. you may wish to consider the following topics:What do you think the public health significance of the research question in this study was?Is it mostly of local significance or is there a global impact? Explain.Does the study fill an important gap, in your opinion? Why or why not? Critique the methodology.Why do you think the authors chose this methodology and what would you have done differently? Explain.Interpret the results in your own words and then discuss with your colleagues whether you agree or disagree with the author’s interpretations and why.What other recent studies can you find that either contradict or support these findings? Do the other studies impact your assessment of the significance and interpretation of this study? How? Be sure to provide the full citation for the other studies that you bring up.Journal ArticleBogard A., K. et al. (2013). Ground beef handling and cooking practices in restaurants in eight States. Journal of Food Protection. 76(12):2132-40.

In this task, you will write an analysis (suggested length of 3–5 pages) of one work of literature.Renaissance• Shakespeare, Twelfth Night, ca. 1601 (drama)You will create a paragraph of descriptive writing with your personal observations about the work. This paragraph must be written before you do research on the work, the author, and the period it comes from. You will need to be quite detailed in your description of the work.The next step will be to research the work, the life of the artist, and the period. You will then be ready to create your analysis. This process of analysis will require you to discuss the historical context of the work, pertinent aspects of the author’s biography, themes and/or stylistic characteristics of its historical period, and finally, the relevance of this work for audiences today.The final requirement of the task will be to reflect on this process of analysis and describe how your perception of the work changed.Requirements:A. Record your initial reaction to the work (suggested length of 1 paragraph or half a page) by doing the following:1. Describe your initial thoughts and/or feelings about the work.2. Describe in detail at least one aspect of the work that most interests you.B. Analyze the work (suggested length of 2–4 pages) by doing the following:1. Describe the historical context of the period in which the work was written.2. Discuss insights into the work that can be gained from the author’s biography.3. Analyze how this work explores a particular theme and/or stylistic characteristic from its period.4. Explain the relevance of this work for today’s audiences.C. Discuss how the deeper knowledge you gained through your analysis has informed or altered your thoughts and/or feelings about the work (suggested length of 1 paragraph or half a page).D. When you use sources to support ideas and elements in a paper or project, provide acknowledgement of source information for any content that is quoted, paraphrased or summarized. Acknowledgement of source information includes in-text citation noting specifically where in the submission the source is used and a corresponding reference, which includes:• Author• Date• Title• Location of information (e.g., publisher, journal, or website URL)

A paper on this act should describe the major provision of the legislation including what it requires employers to do concerning offering and financing health insurance. Why is this law so controversial? You could examine the differential effects on firms that offer health insurance and those that do not, how it might impact small versus large firms, and other ways the legislation will affect HR policies. How the ACA is being implemented across the country? What are its successes? What are the remaining problems associated with this law?10 pages + References

Do a critique of the research study in which you:• Evaluate the authors’ use of literature using the Use of Literature Checklist as a guide• Evaluate the research problem using the Problem Statement Checklist as a guide• Explain what it means for a research study to be justified and grounded in the literature; then, explain what it means for a problem to be originalBe sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style

This task is a 1500 words policy brief report based upon the topic I have decided Drug Trafficking in Queensland, and according to my tutor’s instruction, the draft, the preparation section I have done. So dear writer, what you need to do, is basing on my draft (preparation) and following the template structure to complete the report. Further more details of this assessment, you can refer to the assessment guideline I uploaded. Also I have uploaded my weekly readings and lecture slides, hope they could be helpful. For the political approaches in the report, you don’t need to create any new one, you could develop them from the existing policies, you might refer any approaches from other countries, personally I reckon the source from DEA (USA), because Australia doesn’t have that similar drug admin agency yet, but please remember, currently I am studying in Australia, just don’t forget to consider Australian situations as well, If you have any questions or concerns that I didn’t explain clearly, please let me know ASAP.

In an extended definition essay of 800 – 1000 words, answer the following question: How do you define “quality education”?In your response to this question, think broadly, critically, and creatively. Think about the complex factors that define \”quality education,\” as well as what the separate terms \”quality\” and \”education\” mean in the first place.In addition to defining \”quality education,\” you must also analyze your definition: WHY do you define \”quality education\” as you do?For this assignment, you will write to an academic audience. An academic audience would require the same level of formality as a potential employer during a job interview. Think carefully about how you will approach this audience.PLEASE DO NOT:Focus on negative definition for this essay (do not focus on what \”quality education\” is not.)Include personal narrativeList a specific degree or program as an example of \”quality education\” (i.e. avoid statements like \”The radiography program at Wake Tech defines \’quality education,\’\” or \”To get a quality education, one must complete a master\’s degree\”); instead, think about what specific factors characterize a \”quality education.\”Argue, propose, try to convince or persuade, focus on expressing your feelings, narrate, or write with any other purpose. Your purpose with this essay is to inform.Use 1st or 2nd person. This assignment asks for a response based on your own ideas and thoughts, but this essay must be written in third person only. This means that first and second person (\”I,\” \”we,\” \”us,\” and \”you\”) will NOT appear in your essay. If you have trouble writing in third person, please let me know and/or plan to seek help from the REAL Center.Focus merely on your own opinions (i.e. “I believe,” “I think,” “In my opinion,” etc.). All ideas must be well-supported with logical explanation, details, connections, etc.