Describe briefly, the purpose and context of the training/speech

Assignment

Watch this video by Nick Vujicic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgAKZSTVEs4
Describe briefly, the purpose and context of the training/speech.
Using headings, list all the points about how he conducted his training/speech. Do this sequentially as you watch the video (i.e. introduction first, followed by story telling etc). Under each heading, explain what is good about what he did.
Minimum 2,000 words. Maximum 5,000 words
please write the benefit from the beginning and in and after presentation
why he does make good present

What makes a good question Achievable?

AIP230 Policy Analysis
Guidelines and Instructions 2015To conduct their Policy Analysis, students are to choose one policy and one method (from the four covered in this unit) with which to analyse the policy. You have considerable discretion in the choice of questions to explore. This should make it possible for you in research and writing that is of genuine interest to you.
This assessment task involves two steps. First, the Proposal is due in week 5. This is an opportunity for students to undertake preliminary thinking and research for the Policy Analysis, which is due in week 12.
The Proposal
This is an opportunity for students to undertake preliminary thinking and research for their Policy Analysisand to receive early feedback to help complete the Policy Analysis. There are three steps to this task.
1. Choose a policy or policy area that interests you. It may be one of the topics covered in this unit as 1 What is public policy? , 2 Making Public Policy: Theory and Practice in the Australian Context , 3 Policy Analysis: Four Methods , 4 Economic policy , 5 Welfare Policy , 6 Environmental policy , 7 Health policy , 8 Education policy , 9 Asylum Policy ,and 10 Alcohol and Illicit Drugs Policy
, or something different. Remember, for the purposes of this unit, a policy may be a specific law, a government policy with a name, or a general government approach.
2. Choose a policy analysis method from the four covered in this unit. Think carefully about which method you choose, and some methods will be better suited to some policies.
3. Provide an annotated bibliography. This is a list of references, followed by one or two sentences explaining what this reference does and why it will be useful for your analysis. Note: the sentences explaining the usefulness of the reference is what makes an annotated bibliography different from a reference list.
The Proposal should be 500 words long. It is worth 10%.
• Give your topic a title.
• Clearly outline the policy that you have chosen.
• You may want to identify the parameters (such as geography or time) for your analysis.
• Identify a key question that will guide your analysis.
• Name your method of analysis, and explain why you have chosen this method to evaluate your chosen policy.

• Identify five key references on this policy area. These may be books, journal articles, policy documents, or policy analysis from a reputable source. Your references should contain both policy documents (usually found online on government websites), and more scholarly source material.
• Reference these correctly using the Harvard referencing style.
• In two or three sentences for each reference, explain why these references will be useful for your assignment.
Marking Criteria
When marking the Proposal, assessors will look for the following:
• Has the student followed instructions and guidelines?
• Has the student demonstrated a thoughtful approach to the task, including consideration when choosing a policy and an appropriate method?
• Has the student chosen appropriate references (both policy and scholarly references), applied the Harvard referencing style, and completed an annotated bibliography correctly?
• Does the student display good written communication skills, including spelling, grammar and presentation?

Policy Analysis
This task builds on the preliminary work already undertaken in the Proposal, and takes on board any comments and feedback made in the assessment of that task.
It should be 2000 words long (excluding references), and is worth 50%.
The Policy Analysis should have a title, with page numbers and a header with your name and student number.
The Analysis should be presented in the form of an essay, with an introduction, a body that outlines your argument, and a conclusion. The paragraph immediately following the introduction should outline the chosen method, and explain why this method is appropriate and useful for the policy you wish to analyse.
You may use sub-headings if you think this improves the structure of your argument.
The reference list should be in the Harvard (in-text citation) style, and is not included in the word count. You must refer to at least ten references. These references should include a combination of academic references (books and journal articles), policy documents (from government and think-tanks), Hansard (if appropriate), and other sources, including media articles. Demonstrate good judgment when choosing your reference material (no Wikipedia).
For good examples of Policy Analyses produced by students in previous years, please refer to the 2013 and 2014 editions of PublicusConsilium: Deakin Public Policy Review. Hard and digital copies can be found in the library, and you can also download them from the CloudDeakin site.
Marking Criteria
When marking the Policy Analysis, assessors will look for the following:
• Has the student followed instructions and guidelines?
• Has the student chosen an appropriate policy, and an appropriate method of policy analysis to match their choice of policy?
• Does the student ask a good question?
• Does the Policy Analysis have a good title, and if sub-headings are used, are they appropriate?
• Does the student demonstrate a good understanding of the chosen policy and the method of analysis?
• Has the policy been analysed well? Is the argument clear? Are the conclusions sound?
• Has the student chosen appropriate references (both policy and scholarly references), applied the Harvard referencing style, and completed the reference list correctly?
• Does the student write clearly and succinctly, with correct spelling and grammar and with a professional tone? Is the analysis presented well?

FAQ
Q: Can I choose any policy?
A: Almost! Remember that this unit is about public policy, so there are some topics that are not appropriate. Foreign policy is not public policy, for example. If you are unsure about whether your policy is a public policy it is best to speak with your tutor or the Unit Chair early.
Q: What happens if I want to change my topic or question to something different from what I wrote in my Proposal?
A: It is a common experience for researchers that their topic and questions will change slightly the more they read and learn about a particular issue. Sometimes you’ll realise that the most important or interesting questions are actually slightly different from what you originally proposed. That’s fine, and if this happens to you, feel free to amend your question and topic slightly when it comes to writing your final Analysis. However, try not to deviate too far from your original Proposal – after all, you have already invested time, energy and ideas into this project.
Q: What makes a good question?
Achievable.

write an existing document on Social media project.

I will upload the requirements in a file later (PG Coursework Project Proposal 2015.doc). You need to work on Coursework 2: Social media project.
The work is already half-done by us, so you will need to “package” what we have by writing Executive summary, finishing Organisational analysis,finishing Risk Analysis, writing Project Conclusions and Recommendations, writing Project analysis and Teamwork evaluation.
You will need to write it on the basis of existing documents that we have and also previous coursework on this subject (Project Proposal).

Identify and discuss a set of coherent actions that the organisation may have taken to possibly avoid the legal and reputational situation that resulted from their actions.

Strategic Management Case Study (Semester 1, 2015)
Individual Paper – Case Study Analysis.
The Assignment Task
Read the Case Study: “ When an icon stumbles: the Ribena issue mismanaged. ” and answer the following questions.
Question 1
Identify and discuss a set of coherent actions that the organisation may have taken to possibly avoid the legal and reputational situation that resulted from their actions.
Question 2
From an organisational perspective identify and discuss potentialproblems that may arise in implementing your suggestions.
Question 3
What might be the implications of your suggestions for organisational and management practice? Discuss this from a risk management perspective.
Some additional points to consider

 Your answer must be based in the theory and concepts taught in this subject.
 Discuss this question with reference to at least four theoretical perspectives.
 As a minimum research requirement, the subject text book and required readings must be referenced as part of your research effort to answer this question.
You may also discuss this question with reference to other organisational examples if these will add gravitas to your argument.

Write a dissertation proposal on MA LUXURY BRAND MANAGEMENT

This proposal is for the MA LUXURY BRAND MANAGEMENT – course : RESEARCH METHODS

I choose the overall topic counterfaits in the luxury industry. this is a very broad topic so I would want you to narrow it down and formulate a research question and write a dissertation proposal on this topic. Please note that you will have to find a Title and a thesis yourself. in case you should have any questions please dont hesitate to ask me. This proposal shoud have 23 reliable sources!!

Assessment

Each student will be required to complete a Research Proposal of 3000 words as the basis for a future dissertation.

This is the ONLY assessed component and is worth 100% of the marks for the module.

In order to complete your dissertation, you will have to first establish the theoretical basis for your research, which is provided by the Review of Current Thinking (Literature Review).

You will then need to develop your Research Methodology, explaining how you plan to research the topic.

These are the purposes of this Research Proposal assignment which should be structured as follows:

Title

A working title for the dissertation or consultancy project that reflects its focus. This may be the principle research question that it seeks to answer.

Introduction and research purpose

This section should explain the ‘what’ and ‘why’ of your investigation. It should include the following:

• a clear statement of the issue, problem or research question(s) to be addressed in the dissertation,

• the aim and objectives,

• a discussion of why this issue is important, within a wider organisational and business context.

It will be useful to refer to appropriate secondary sources, in justifying the importance or topical nature of your investigation.

Review of current thinking

Here you need to explain where your investigation fits in the wider body of literature and perhaps informs a current debate in that literature. You should critically evaluate carefully selected concepts, theories and ideas which might be useful for investigating your research topic and taking it forward. You will need to discuss material from a range of relevant academic journal articles, as well as appropriate secondary research. All sources must be referenced using the Harvard system.

A key requirement here is to develop a clear argument, linking the literature to the issue, problem, or questions that you have identified in the introduction; so that we can see how your investigation is informed by current knowledge and how it might enhance that knowledge.

Note: please do not present articles one by one, as in the proposal – you must now compare and contrast, creating an argument and discussion.
Methodology
This section will explore ‘how’ you will conduct your primary research and ‘why’ you have chosen to design your research in that particular way. It needs to demonstrate how your chosen strategy and methods will help to inform the question(s), problem or issue which you identified in the introduction and it needs to build logically on findings from the literature review.
You will need to identify clearly:
1. the research philosophy
2. the research strategy
3. the primary approach
4. the sampling strategy
5. how data are to be analysed
6. Issues concerning validity, reliability
7. Generalisability
8. Limitations
You must offer a full justification for the choices you have made. This is because a good methodology chapter should explain clearly what you intend to do, how you intent to do this and why you intend to do it this way.
For example, you can reflect on why a survey, interview or mixed method approach has been chosen and what other alternatives were considered oAppropriate references should be made to the research methods literature. You should briefly reflect on any access and ethical issues you are likely to encounter during your research and how these would be addressed.

Project Management
You should also include a Time Plan, in the form of a Gantt Chart showing the different tasks you will need to complete prior to submission of your dissertation or consultancy project. Please read the Research Proposal brief carefully and remember that you will need to plan to:
• perhaps revise and review your research question, aim and objectives based on feedback on this proposal
• complete a review of current thinking, check and revise if necessary
• develop your principal research instrument and check with supervisor
• Perhaps conduct a pilot of your primary research (e.g. an interview or feedback on sample questionnaire)
• Draft and re-draft your work
• And much more………..
You will also need to take into account that there are other assignments to be submitted along the way, working on and submitting these should also be part of your time plan.
These are the kind of things that should be taken into account in your time plan.
List of References
Your proposal should also include a list of all your references, using the Harvard system.
Note: marks will also be given for use of English, please therefore ensure you check your work carefully for spelling and grammar.

Assessment Criteria
The PROPOSAL will be assessed according to the following criteria:

• Defining the research question(s) and setting in business context: 20%
• Review of current thinking: range of sources and critical evaluation 30%
• Methodology 30%
• Project management: setting a time plan and delivering against it: 10%
• Written communication: 10%

write a project about a revolutionary product that is changing the world and our lives:

analyze the market of a product/service.
Your project could include the following sections:
1) Introduction
a. Describe the product
b. Describe the main actors: Supply and demand sides and the degree of internationalization of this market.
c. Anticipate some of your conclusions and describe the relevance of this product in terms of welfare or share on GDP…
d. Describe the structure of the project: Section 2 reviews.. Section 3…
(2) Analysis of the current situation and the recent evolution of this market
a. Degree of competitiveness
b. Main determinants of demand: Income, preferences, and existence of close substitutes….
c. Main determinants of supply: Technology, input prices, arrival of new producers
3) Given your analysis in Section 2, anticipate the future evolution of this market.
(4) Concluding Remarks: Summarize your main results.
I would like to write, in my project, about a revolutionary product that is changing the world and our lives: Tesla Cars. Tesla Motors is an American company that designs, manufactures and sells electric cars. It is a company that has evolved rapidly in the market because of the demand for electric cars, because of the effort to step aside from gasoline powered cars. Electric cars are the future, and I think that it will be interesting to investigate and study the market, competitiveness with other brands of electric cars, study the determinants of demand and supply, and the history and the future evolution of the product and market.

Write an essay about the Book “The Left Hand Of Darkness”

I need an Essay about the Book (The Left Hand Of Darkness)ISBN 978-0-441-47812-5 I will be picking a thematic element from the book and I have to write 3-4 page interpretative analysis on that thematic element that illustrates its relevant to contemporary society. you can change the Topic if you need toThis is the request from the teacher.
Many thematic elements are introduced and explored in The Left Hand Of Darkness: religion, masculinity/femininity, politics, sexuality, commitment/betrayal, etc. Select a thematic element of the novel that you see as relevant to contemporary society.
I think I would choose commitment/betrayal. remember that I need to include quotations for this essay and Works Cited Page. I am suppose to hand any papers I use to plan my work. so if you can email me any work paper used to the essay that would be nice. just in case. I live in Lancaster, PA but I am from Puerto Rico, in case is useful for the essay. Any questions you can call me. thanks

Describe an experience that demonstrates your interest and commitment to your chosen health profession.

I need your assistance to write an essay to answer below question:
Use your own words to create a brief personal essay that includes responses to the question below. Some programs require an additional essay question. Visit the individual program pages for instructions.
Describe an experience that demonstrates your interest and commitment to your chosen health profession.
The essay is required for Advanced Master of Cytotechnology program in Thomas Jefferson University. My expertise is 2 years in Histopathology laboratory and 4 years in Cytotechnology lab. My brief CV will be attached to the request.
Also, the required essay should be written in simple English language.
Thank you,