Describe the steps in the traditional organizing drive. What “nontraditional” organizing tactics are unions using to increase their membership ranks.

1. Explain 3 areas in which employee rights and employer responsibilities could result in conflict. How might this conflict arise?

2. Define employment at will doctrine. What are 3 major court exceptions to the doctrine?

3.What are the legislative and court restrictions on employer drug testing in both the private and public sectors?

5. a.What should be the purpose of an investigative interview, and what approach should be taken.
b. discuss why documentation is so important to the disciplinary process. What constitutes correct documentation ?

Chapter 14: discussion questions

1. Under the provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act, which unfair labor practices apply to both unions and employers?

2.Contrast the arguments concerning union membership that are likely to be presented by a union with those likely to be presented by an employer.

3. Describe the steps in the traditional organizing drive. What “nontraditional” organizing tactics are unions using to increase their membership ranks?

Explain how do leadership behaviours positively and negatively impact upon employee commitment to organisational change.

Questions:
1: How and why do middle managers support and resist strategic change? 950 words (40%) Patch 1 – strategic change
2: Why do models of planned change not bring about cultural change? 900 words
3: How do leadership behaviours positively and negatively impact upon employee commitment to organisational change? 900 words

Write a paper focused on the human side of management and leadership and explain its important to a healthy and productive organization.

The topics of management and leadership are important to a healthy and productive organization. Students will Write a paper focused on the human side of management and leadership using information from the course material, plus any supplemental material provided to you or from your own research.
This paper requires student to reflect on the various topics covered in chapters 6-8 and then select three aspects of the human side of management and leadership and write about what is valuable to you, not to employees or other stakeholders within an organization. In writing this short paper, students are expected to explain why each aspect is valued and why. In explaining why, students must support their reasoning using the course material.
Students need to avoid taking articles and writing the paper around the article. Course material and articles contain information that will help students support their reasoning and it the reflection of the material that will provide the basis for the paper.
Required Elements of the Short Paper:
· Identify at least three aspects of the human side of management and leadership from the readings;
Explain why the aspects chosen should be valued;
Apply the material learned in the course to support the reasoning of why these aspects are valued.

Critically discuss the assumptions upon which Balanced scorecard is based and evaluate its usefulness as a performance measurement system.

Describe Balanced scorecard and its purpose in an organization. Critically discuss the assumptions upon which Balanced scorecard is based and evaluate its usefulness as a performance measurement system. You should explain how it has been applied BAE systems. Asses the value of the Balanced scorecard as a performance measurement system.

Write a short essay by summarizing the main arguments of the case study: “The Money Supply, the Money Multiplier and the Monetary Base During and After the 2007-2009 Financial Crisis”.

1. Write a short essay by summarizing the main arguments of the case study: “The Money Supply, the Money Multiplier and the Monetary Base During and After the 2007-2009 Financial Crisis”, Hubbard, Ch-14, Page 435-436. It carries 10 points.

2. Write a short essay (not more than 300 words) by summarizing the main arguments of the topic: ” Why Can’t the Fed Always Hits Its Federal Fund Target?”, Hubbard, Ch-15, Page 462-463. Read these two pages carefully and summarize. You can also use the graph at page 463 to build up your answers. It caries 10 points.

3. Write a short essay (not more than 500 words) by analyzing the case study: “Quantitative Easing(Q.E)- Fed Bond Purchase During and After the Financial Crisis”,Hubbard, Ch-15, Page 463-464. Read these two pages carefully and summarize. Can you link FED’s Q.E programs and Federal Fund Market? It carried 10 points.

Write a Plato-style dialogue between Socrates(Plato,Meno) and Rene Descartes(Meditations on First Philosophy) in which they discuss knowledge, truth, falsity, and God(s).

Write a Plato-style dialogue between Socrates(Plato,Meno) and Rene Descartes(Meditations on First Philosophy) in which they discuss knowledge, truth, falsity, and God(s).
Books:
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=plat.+meno+70a
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/descartes/1639/meditations.htm

‘What’s Wrong with the Australian Law of Contract?’ Considering the above quotes, has the High Court’s statement in Ermogenous on the use of ‘presumptions’ in the determination of the intention to create legal relations been correctly understood and implemented by lower courts in Australia?

Andrew Stewart, ‘What’s Wrong with the Australian Law of Contract?’ (2012)
29 Journal of Contract Law 74, 81 (citations omitted).
Ms Ashton contended that the primary judge erred in applying the presumption
[not to create legal relations]. It is correct that his Honour accepted the
presumption applied…
Ashton v Pratt [2015] NSWCA 12 (16 February 2015) [72].

Considering the above quotes, has the High Court’s statement in Ermogenous on the
use of ‘presumptions’ in the determination of the intention to create legal relations
been correctly understood and implemented by lower courts in Australia? Was the
High Court correct in re-characterising the role of presumptions?
In your answer, you must:
– identify and discuss the ratio of the High Court’s decision in Ermogenous;
– research and examine the subsequent judicial and academic treatment of the case,
including Ashton;
– state and explain your own opinion in response to the question.