The development of the concept of reflective practice in teaching-the theoretical framework for RP-how to connect theory to classroom practices via RP- models of reflective practice for teachers- levels of RP-recent studies about RP in EFL teaching
The essay should be typed, 1.5 spacing, 12 font, references (footnotes or in text) and bibliography included. This written essay is based on the research problem formulated in the research proposal below. One additional theme to the themes addressed in the research proposal will have to be incorporated in the essay:
1) Equality, power, transformation and memory
The task in the research proposal was to formulate a research problem (assumptions, research questions, literature review) that engages with and responds to the following:
„A general jurisprudence brings back to the centre the aesthetic, ethical and material aspects of legality. It reminds us that poets and artists have legislated, while philosphers and laywers operate an aesthetics of life in order to bring together the main ingredients of life, the biological, the social, the unconscious. General jurisprudence includes the political economoy of law; the legal constructions of subjectivity; and the ways in which gender, race or sexuality create forms of identity, both disciplining bodies and offering sites of resistance.‟ (Douzinas „The responsibility of the critic‟ (2014) Law and Critique 189)
You should include the following:
1) The distinction between general and restricted jurisprudence (linked to various legal philosophical approaches)
2) Modernity, legal pluralism
3) The book that you‟ve chosen should be central to the research problem and argument
Direction: Choose One of the following questions. Answer the question in an essay.
Discuss the differences between stereotype grotesque and the anti-portrait as strategies employed by artists whose works engage with identity politics grounding your analysis in Artifact Piece by James Luna and Waterbearer by Lorna Simpson. Be sure to use and define key terms and to support your claims and statements with detailed descriptions of how those ideas can be seen functioning in the works of art. You may use quotes and refer to other works of art covered in class to support your ideas. Your essay should be well organized, free of spelling and grammatical errors, and use citations when you use the ideas or words of another author.
Dissect a Quantitative Chemical Analysis Paper
The goal of this effort is to learn how to dissect a peer reviewed article into its various parts, by conducting research using primary literature sources.
Describe the article in your own words (not verbatim from the text) including the Background, Methods, Results and Conclusions.
•Write a statement of your response to the article based on background research using primary literature sources.
Grading for Quantitative Chemical Analysis Paper:
-Hypothesis State the hypothesis of the study in your own words.
-Methods List and give a detailed description of the experimental procedures used to gain the data; include a list of reagents and equipment used.
-Results Describe the results that were obtained.
-Conclusions In your own words state the conclusions reached.
-Response – put it into context. Do a literature search and try to put this paper into perspective – what kind of impact do you think this paper has had a Quantitative Chemical Analysis community and why?
1) The literature review is fine, keep it as it is pleas, and it shouldn’t be counted in the word count
2) I requested 2200 word and my Literature Review have 857 word, so the final paper should exceed 3000 word.
3) Use the literature review as a starting point to what the paper should look like, meaning I don’t want the final paper to look like two different writers has written it, pleas..
4) Add a paragraph below about why am I writing it (fans in Qatar doesn’t attend games in the stadium).
5) Add another paragraph below to specify the paper topic.
6) Use the references below and combined them with more references
7) Methodology need a lot more information and details
Important criteria of methodology:
• Sources
• Screening: & Excluding criteria:??
• Scales used
• Translation the scales
Job Analysis, Recruitment and Selection
The review is a critical analysis of the article…the content, possible research, presentation, application to HR management…and so forth. A mere summary of the content does not qualify as a review.
2. Keep the length of the review to something manageable…excluding a title page you should not exceed 3-5 pages of content. Brevity and succinctness are important!
3. Overall, think about the fact that you are reviewing so others who might be inclined to dig this article up might or might not want to based on your review…so its takes a little thought!
4. Make sure you cite work/content that is not yours…do not take credit for other’s ideas etc. There is no sin in citing…in fact more is better than less.
This week we will dig deeper into part of the working capital management starting with cash and marketable securities. Answer these two questions for this week:\n\n1. Offer three reasons with full explanation for why it is important for companies to keep a fair portion of their overall asset balance in liquid assets.\n\n2. What are some considerations for companies in choosing which marketable securities to invest idle cash balances?