IDENTIFY A THEME FROM THIS TEXT.

A THEME IS A LEADER THAT A LITERARY TEXT CONVEYS ABOUT HUMANITY. THINK ABOUT A STORY YOU HAVE READ IDENTIFY A THEME FROM THIS TEXT. WRITE AN ESSAY THAT DESCRIBES THIS THEME. INCLUDE DETAILS FROM THE STORY THAT SUPPORT THE THEME, AND EXPLAIN HOW DETAILS DEVELOP THE THEME. AS YOU WRITE, REMEMBER YOUR ESSAY WILL BE SCORED BASED ON HOW WILL YOU.
DEVELOP A MULTI-PARAGRAPH RESPONSE TO THE ASSIGNED TOPIC THAT CLEARLY COMMUNICATES YOUR THESIS TO THE AUDIENCE
SUPPORT YOUR THESIS WITH MEANINGFUL EXAMPLES AND REFERENCE FROM THE TEXT, CAREFULLY CITING AND DIRECT QUOTES.
ORGANIZE YOUR ESSAY IN A CLEAR AND LOGIAL MANNER, INCLUDING AN INTRODUCTION, BODY, AND CONCLUSION.
USE WELL-STRUTTED ENTRANCES AND LANGUAGE THAT ARE APPROPRIATE FOR YOUR AUDIENCE.

Describe a situation or element of your first, second, third, or forth project that failed or went wrong.

0
Paper details:
1) Describe a situation or element of your first, second, third, or forth project that failed or went wrong. Then, tell me how you fixed or recover from the failure.
2) Pick one of your projects and describe this: If you had one more chance to make a revision to that project, what would you revise? Think beyond “I’d make the grammar and spelling better.” Think big. See big.
————————–

Explain “The Thematic Paradigm,” Robert Ray defines several different types of film heroes, including the reluctant hero, the outlaw hero, and the official hero.

Be sure to follow ALL paper and assignment guidelines. 2-3 pages, double-spaced Must contain a clear thesis in direct response to the prompt Must analyze and cite specific evidence (either from text, film, or show) No “I” or personal opinion/examples No “You” Start each body paragraph with a topic sentence and use 2-3 examples as support per body paragraph (properly cited) Introduce and punctuate all titles correctly!!! Your paper will contain three sections.First, you will summarize the legend and tell what it is. Then, using your research, give examples of the legend occurring, whether it be an old story, accounts of those who have experienced it, or news reports. You should also include where and how this legend began if you can find that information. Finally, your final paragraph should offer YOUR opinion. After all of your research, determine whether or not you find the legend credible, and why or why not. In “The Thematic Paradigm,” Robert Ray defines several different types of film heroes, including the reluctant hero, the outlaw hero, and the official hero. Using specific, cited evidence from Ray’s article, choose examples of each type of hero and analyze how they fulfill his definitions Here is the lick for the article http://xroads.virginia.edu/~drbr/robray.txt
Comments from Support Team: You need to choose 2~3sentences from the article to support the idea. And the format is like ………( Ray Page number)
I have sent the link of the article to you, please make sure you can open it.

What evidence do you have of enterprise and employ ability skills developed to date and how do you think you may use any skills developed in a role in the future.

I want you to please check my work and add references. It is a Personal Reflection report and business performance, I was in a group and we had to come up with a business idea. First, we came up with smoothies and cupcakes but then we were not allowed to sell homemade food/drinks due to safety. The attachment explains everything in detail.
Here are some points that will help also:

– Need to be 1500 words
– Account for the ventures success or otherwise by considering how it performed against your business plan?
– Reflect on your personal contribution to the decision making and actions used to develop the business in your role that you adopted in the business?
– What would your team need to do differently in the future to improve business performance?
better planning and more research on what we are doing before starting, for example we decided to do the smoothies before planing and ask the union if we are allowed to do homemade stuff.
– What evidence do you have of enterprise and employ ability skills developed to date and how do you think you may use any skills developed in a role in the future?
– Mention the belbin test

Briefly introduce Yoko Ono’s background and early life in Japan, how she became an artist and starts her career( simply intro 3 arts work, and detail describe 1 art work(very important)).

The final research paper I will mainly focused on the Japanese artist Yoko Ono’s works. Especially, the periods of early 1960s till 1970s when she actives in New York City and Europe. First of all, I will briefly introduce Yoko Ono’s background and early life in Japan, how she became an artist and starts her career( simply intro 3 arts work, and detail describe 1 art work(very important)). Second, I would describe her relationship with John Lennon, the singer and songwriter of the most famous band The Beatles in the world. How this relationship affects Yoko Ono’s works and the works that they create together(also simply list 5 art works, detail write one art work such as Bed in Peace(very important)). In the End, I may write about the connection between MoMa and Yoko Ono since she had engagement with MoMa dates to her arrival onto the New York art scene in the late 1950s and early 1960s.(list 3 art works, then detail write one display in the Yoko Ono: One Woman Show 1960-1971 at The MoMa (very important))

sources:
1:Biesenbach, Klaus, and Yōko Ono. Yoko Ono: One Woman Show, 1960 – 1971. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 2015. Print.

2:Yes Yoko Ono, Alexandra Munroe;Yōko Ono; Jon Hendricks; Bruce Altshuler
New York : Japan Society ; Harry N. Abrams;2000

3:All we are saying : the last major interview with John Lennon and Yoko Ono
John Lennon 1940-1980.;Yōko Ono; David Sheff; G Golson
New York : St. Martin’s Griffin;2000

Civil Rights and Liberties are not always complementary protections for citizens. Explain

Civil Rights and Liberties are not always complementary protections for citizens. Sometimes they can conflict. In the very interesting case of the Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000), the Supreme Court had the task of balancing First Amendment protections for free association against the civil rights protections provided under the laws of the State of New Jersey against discrimination.

As you can gather from the case summary, as well as for the longer “syllabus” of the case, the issue was whether the Boy Scouts could legally discriminate against homosexuals. On the one hand, as a private organization, the Boy Scouts have the right to determine their criteria for membership. On the other hand, the State of New Jersey has the power to pass laws forbidding discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

Life in the 1920s was exciting for a guy like me.

Life in the 1920s was exciting for a guy like me. I was 17 years old and had given up on high school. I was eager to set out on a journey different from that of my parents, a rebel I thought. I packed up my things and traveled by train from my rural hometown in Kansas to the industrial land of Michigan, seeking work at the Ford plant. I developed a strong curiosity for automobiles after seeing a few in person and many advertisements for them in my hometown. Once I got on with the labor force at Ford, I slowly settled into my new surroundings. I found a place to live in the city, renting a room from a co-worker whose family needed help to make ends meet. I worked hard at Ford but didn’t make much money. My days were spent working on the assembly line of the Model A. My nights were spent in town, where the theater was popular and people my age congregated to socialize and be seen. The girls my age were rebels in their own right. With their new found style and loosened morals, women created quite the distraction for me and my obsession with them and alcohol cost me my job at Ford. Desperate for work, I took up a job driving a transport car for one of the bootleggers in town that needed help to keep up with demand for alcohol. The excitement and thrill of the criminal life was intoxicating, more so than the whiskey. Fortunately, that life was short lived for me. Forced out violently by the a rival bootlegger, my employer left town and with no money or job, I had to move back to Kansas. Unable to produce, my family lost the farm and my father deserted us to escape the shame. Here’s to welfare…

Response to the post (100 words):
It’s 1933, and I’m a 25 year old mother of two little kids, with another on the way. We have a small house just outside of Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. My husband was laid off of his job as a steelworker. We had some money saved up, so he decided to try his luck in Galveston, TX. He heard there were some opportunities that opened up, yet he never discussed what.
Meanwhile, I took in my parents, as they also struggle. I figured that we could costs by living together, and also give me the chance to find some work while they watch the kids. Our euphoria was short-lived, as only a couple weeks later my father was laid off of his factory job. I didn’t have any luck finding anything useful, but let’s even if jobs were available, who would hire a seven-month pregnant lady. Things have gotten to the point where I don’t think I’ll be able to feed my children much longer. After the last bits of savings were used up, we went to the food bank every night. However, the sheer number of unemployed people mean that food is very limited. If we’re late, we don’t get any.
My father got really sick; his age was catching up with him. With all of us jobless, we could only care for my dad at home. We couldn’t afford a doctor. To top off this downward spiral, my husband has been gone for four months we haven’t gotten the chance to talk a lot. He must have found a small job, as he would send us a little bit of money when he could. But one Wednesday morning, I received a telegram; my husband took his own life. The stress was too great. The only hope we have left is that President Roosevelt’s New Deal program will change the country.

Summarize the attached chapter from Saudi Arabia.

Dear writer, In this order what I need you to do is summarize the attached chapter(Chapter 2) into 3 pages. Following the summary, I need you to write 10 (True & False) questions and 10 (Multiple Choice) questions in regards to this chapter. I am a student from Saudi Arabia just in case you need to know. Thanks in advance!

Explain similarities between texts as their observations, and make arguments on the basis of them.

1. You must have a clear and specific thesis, stated early in your paper, preferably in the first or second paragraph. This thesis should be argumentative and should not be observational. The difference between these two types of thesis may be represented by the following examples:
Observational Thesis: “William Wells Brown’s Clotelle, Paul Laurence Dunbar’s ‘We Wear the Mask’ and W.E.B. Du Bois’ The Souls of Black Folk all provide examples of the double.” This is observational because it is obvious, and because it merely makes a statement about (i.e., it only describes) what all the texts have in common. “The double” is the object of the thesis sentence and not the subject.
Argumentative Thesis: “‘The double’ as found in William Wells Brown’s Clotelle, Paul Laurence Dunbar’s ‘We Wear the Mask’ and W.E.B. Du Bois’ The Souls of Black Folk represents the cultural predicament faced by African Americans during Reconstruction.” This is argumentative because it takes an observation (that all these texts share the figure of the double) and uses it to make an argument (i.e., a point which goes beyond the descriptive) about how that observation relates back to all the texts. “The double” is the subject of the thesis sentence (i.e., it has a verb which follows it) and not the object. An argumentative thesis takes an observational thesis to the next level. A good way to change an observation to an argument is to look at an observation and ask, “and so?” or “so what’s my point?” The best argumentative theses are the most specific: they use very specific similarities between texts as their observations, and make arguments on the basis of them.
Do not leave your thesis until the final paragraph. If you write your paper in one take, at one sitting, often you will only realize what your paper’s overall point is at the very end of your paper. I strongly recommend that you do not turn in a paper which looks like this. This means that you may have to revise your paper at least once before turning it in. If you do arrive at a thesis only at the end of your paper, a good way to fix this is to take the conclusions from your final paragraphs and apply them to your opening paragraphs, and then make sure each of your paper’s paragraphs make reference to these conclusions in turn.
2. You should refer to your thesis in each paragraph, preferably at both the beginning and end of each paragraph. Each paragraph should have what some teachers call a “topic sentence” – some sentence, usually at the beginning of a paragraph, which states that paragraph’s main point, or the point which makes that paragraph’s discussion different from every other paragraph’s discussion. But each paragraph should also have a “thesis-connecting sentence” – a sentence which connects that paragraph back to your whole paper’s main overall point, and ties each paragraph into your whole paper’s overall thesis. Each paragraph should have its own mini-discussion, of course, but each paragraph should also have some relationship to your overall argument, and you should make that relationship clear.
3. Each paragraph should include at least one quotation from your text(s). Every paragraph needs a point, and every point needs proof. The best kind of proof – the best kind of evidence that what you’re claiming is the case is, at least in your paper, actually the case – is a direct quotation from the text. Thus, every paragraph should have a quotation. Your quotations must be properly cited, complete with page numbers. They must also be incorporated and not unincorporated:
Unincorporated quotation: Frances E.W. Harper illustrates how slaves were able to transmit information under their masters’ very noses. “In conveying the tidings of war, if they wished to announce a victory of the Union army, they said the butter was fresh, or that the fish and eggs were in good condition.” (Iola Leroy, 9) These two sentences are totally separate (i.e., unincorporated) and the quotation exists as an isolated sentence with no source, dropped in like a sound bite.
Incorporated quotation: Frances E.W. Harper illustrates how slaves were able to transmit information under their masters’ very noses. “In conveying the tidings of war,” Harper writes, “if they wished to announce a victory of the Union army, they said the butter was fresh, or that the fish and eggs were in good condition.” (Iola Leroy, 9) The quotation is broken up by a clear indicator of its source, and it is made into a full sentence (i.e., incorporated) of its own.
Any paper which does not include regular quotations (preferably one per paragraph) will not receive a very good grade. Any paper which includes no quotations whatsoever will not receive a passing grade.
4. Your paragraphs should be of reasonable length. There is of course no universal rule governing the length of the “perfect” paragraph, nor should there be: there is an art to writing, whether it be poetry or English papers. But some general customs do apply: anything consisting of three sentences or less is too short, and anything which fills over half a full page in size is too long. Paragraphs, like papers, make their arguments in steps, and if in each paragraph you have a topic sentence, a quotation, and a thesis-connecting sentence, then you already have three sentences – and you haven’t even discussed anything yet. (If you come from a business-writing background – used to writing in bullet points or other very short, digestible “thought bites” – this may be a particularly important guideline to remember.) Conversely, if you have a paragraph which goes on for over a full page or more, then you clearly don’t have only one main point which that paragraph is trying to convey, and you’re trying to do too much. (If you tend to write your papers in one take, very quickly, or at the last minute – used to throwing all of your thoughts down in a rush with little attention to your overall paragraph structure – this may be a particularly important guideline to remember.) Paragraphs are the main argumentative unit of an English paper; a paragraph is to a paper what a sentence is to a paragraph, and, just as with sentences, there are “fragment” paragraphs as well as “run-on” paragraphs. You should avoid both.
5. Ground your paper in the text(s). Most of your paragraphs should be directly concerned with authors, plots, characters, themes, symbols, conflicts, and other literary things, and not in the abstractions which surround them: “society,” “history,” “culture,” and so on. This means avoiding what I call “Since the Dawn of Time Stories” – papers which attempt to account for all of human history in their argumentative sweep. Do not attempt, for example, to write about “all” of slavery, “all” of American history, or even “slaves” in general; instead, you should write about specific authors and their texts. Sentences, paragraphs, and papers should begin with and regularly return to authors, characters, etc., as their subjects. Instead of saying, for example, “African Americans have always resisted racial oppression,” you should say, for example, “The authors Brown, Dunbar, and Harper all show a variety of ways in which African Americans resisted racial oppression.” This may seem like a subtle difference, but it’s a crucial one. You should, of course, remember that neither you nor your authors are writing in a vacuum, but a good English paper is all about the literature.
6. Try to achieve a reasonable degree of balance between the different texts you discuss. While it’s often difficult to devote exactly equal time and space to each of your required texts, you do want to shoot for a paper which is not terribly unbalanced – three pages of a five-page paper devoted to one text and half a page for each remaining text, for example, is not a good balance. A good paper distributes its discussions of all its texts as evenly as possible across all its pages.
7. Don’t be afraid to have an opinion, but phrase your opinions in terms of analyses of the text(s). While I don’t forbid using the first-person singular pronoun “I” in papers, I do think it’s largely unnecessary: I will know it’s you making your points, and often “I” statements lessen the impact of a good solid analysis. Don’t feel the need to qualify your opinions by saying “I think that,” “I feel that,” “it seems as if,” or other similar phrases. A good rule of thumb is to go through each paper and look for moments where you tend to apologize for having your own opinion, and delete the phrases that precede your actual point. Act as if you’re right, and your argument will usually be better off. (the essay should be writing about Gorilla, My love)

Discuss about “Remember the Titans”.

Instructions: The film that I choose is “Remember the Titans”. Within the six page paper I am expected to apply the material covered in class (Especially Bonilla-Silva’s 4 Frames of colorblind racism). As his/her critical thinking decision making objective, the student should decide whether the societal evidence he/she reviews in the paper :
a) demonstrates the typical colorblind pattern that Bonilla-Silva describes in the textbook; or
b) reveals a more progressive and/or minority pattern
c) Some combination of the above
d) Some other pattern not discussed in the textbook but worth exploring in future research.

The student may find that the quotes he/she analyzes deliberately challenge one of the 4 frames of colorblindness in some way, and he/she can note this in the paper as well. The paper should consider the implications of the analysis of colorblindness for the future of a multiracial society. In other words, how do the representations discovered in your analysis help and/or hinder a society’s progress toward inclusive multiracial democracy?

The books Required for this class is listed below:
1) Bonilla-Silva, E. 2010 Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and Racial Inequality in Contemporary America. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield. ISBN-13:9781442202184
2) Higganbotham, E. and Margaret L. Anderson. 2011. Race and Ethnicity in Society: The Changing Landscape. 3rd ed. Belmont Ca: Wadsworth. ISBN-13:9781111519537

The six page paper should quote and illustrate all 4 frames of colorblindness and analyze them accordingly.

The two sources I would like to use is the book on “Remember the Titans and the