Author: chris

Answer the question.
What are the relationships between R&D spending, patents and economic performance?

Below is the grading rubric used for this discussion question:

Criteria

Points

Discussion Question

Submitted the discussion question and completely answered the question. A quality response fully answers the question asked.

25 points

APA Standards

Written response conforms to APA format (in-text citations and references as required, punctuation, headings, paraphrasing, seriation). At a minimum, focus on in-text citations, sentence punctuation, seriation rules, and reference list construction. You should list and cite the text, as appropriate, when responding to the discussion question.

3 points

Spelling and Grammar

Submitted assignment was checked for spelling and grammar errors.

2 points

Directions: In one page discuss an instance of an observed instance of class inequality.no references, please

using some papers provided, we need to map four system properties to the three dimensions identified in previous section of the paper. That is ontological properties map to social controls. Teleological and functional will map onto technical controls. Genetic will map on to dynamic change controls

Each entry should (1) either briefly quote or summarize one passage in one (or more) assigned text for that day and (2) record your own reflections on the reading. Each entry should engage the ideas of the text in some direct and thoughtful way.Each journal entry should be relatively brief (approximately 250 words and no more than two or three well constructed, thoughtful paragraphs written in complete, grammatically correct sentences). Your entries should demonstrate that you have read and reflected about the course materials. You might use one of the posted discussion questions as a starting point. High-quality entries advance our learning process by making connections to course themes or previous comments, demonstrating insight and creativity, answering or posing helpful questions, and/or presenting persuasive arguments. Also, please feel free to raise questions or ask for clarification in your journal entries.

The Brisbane Good Food and Wine Show are seeking to develop a better understanding of attendee motives. From previous iterations of delivering the event, the managers know that attendees can be classified into two primary groups: tourists and non-tourists.

Suppose you are part of a political organization that has taken the position that one of the ways to “fix Congress” is to impose term limits on members of the Senate and House of Representatives. Your initial research reflects that it will be necessary to amend the U.S. Constitution to accomplish this. Prepare a plan detailing how your organization will accomplish its goal. Include the following.1. Provide two (2) reasons why amending the U.S. Constitution would be necessary versus passing a law. Include Marbury v. Madison and U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton.2. In view of the canons of construction and interpretation, name and explain three (3) necessary elements that you must consider before drafting language to amend the U.S. Constitution.3. List the two (2) primary paths you would pursue to amend the U.S. Constitution. Cite the applicable section(s) of the Constitution.4. Explain the three branches of government including each branch’s authority and responsibility. How would your plan impact each branch?

After formulating a clearly defined plan for a gap analysis, the next logical step is to conduct the gap analysis. The gap analysis will shed additional light on the details of the current-state workflow and provide directions for transitioning into the future-state workflow.At this stage in the Course Project, you will conduct your gap analysis, which you planned throughout Weeks 3–5. You will also finalize your draft of the current-state workflow in Visio using the information you collect during your gap analysis.To prepare for Part 2 of the Course Project:Review your Gap Analysis Plan (Part 1 of the Course Project) and prepare any necessary recording documents and meeting/observation arrangements with the individuals involved in the workflow.Conduct the gap analysis. Observe and consult with individuals in your organization who are involved in the workflow.Analyze the data you gathered and whether or not it meets the goals and objectives you set in your Gap Analysis Plan (Part 1 of the Course Project).Interpret the meanings and implications of the data you collected. Consider how the workflow issues relate to electronic health records (EHRs) and one or more specific meaningful use objectives.Examine your Visio draft of the current-state workflow. Consider how the draft aligns with the data you collected in your gap analysis. You will also receive feedback from your colleagues in Week 6.Begin revising your Visio draft of the current-state workflow based on your gap analysis. Remember to update the information in the swimlane. In addition, prepare to write a detailed description of your Visio workflow.To complete Part 2 of the Course Project:Based on the information gathered in your gap analysis, create a finalized Visio model of the current-state workflow.Then, in a 3- to 4-page paper, respond to the following:Explain the results of your gap analysis and how they address the goals you set in Part 1 of the Course Project. Identify the issues (gaps) within the current workflow.Analyze how the issues you identified relate to EHRs and one or more meaningful use objectives.Describe in detail the final version of your Visio model of the current-state workflow. Include in your description an explanation of the swimlane (who completes each step). In addition, identify where the workflow gaps exist.Explain how you changed your Visio draft based on the feedback you will have received from your colleagues in the Week 6 Discussion and the information you gathered during your gap analysis.In a reference list, cite a minimum of three scholarly references (with APA citations) you used to conduct your gap analysis and create your current-state workflow model.Part 2 of the Course Project, including both the paper and the current-state workflow model in Visio, is due by Day 7 of Week 7.Find attached the part 1 of the project

Is it helping the environment or damaging economies?

Each entry should (1) either briefly quote or summarize one passage in one (or more) assigned text for that day and (2) record your own reflections on the reading. Each entry should engage the ideas of the text in some direct and thoughtful way.Each journal entry should be relatively brief (approximately 250 words and no more than two or three well constructed, thoughtful paragraphs written in complete, grammatically correct sentences). Your entries should demonstrate that you have read and reflected about the course materials. You might use one of the posted discussion questions as a starting point. High-quality entries advance our learning process by making connections to course themes or previous comments, demonstrating insight and creativity, answering or posing helpful questions, and/or presenting persuasive arguments. Also, please feel free to raise questions or ask for clarification in your journal entries.

Choose two existing health care organizations or companies in the same discipline, such as hospital-hospital, insurance company-insurance company, med spa-med spa, and so forth.Compare each organization\’s positioning and differentiation strategies in a 1,400- to 1,750-word review.