Review and assess the interview questions used by the Southwood School District.

Review and assess the interview questions used by the Southwood School District. Develop a report in which you present your assessment.
As part of this report, develop five additional questions that you believe should be asked by the principal and HR manager when selecting a new employee. Using three external sources, provide supporting rationale to support the five additional questions and any changes to existing questions. Cite external sources using APA format.
Cover Page with Name, Date, and Title of Assignment
Use headings to separate the sections of the paper
Page numbers
Double-spacing
Times New Roman, size 12
In-text citations to sources in APA style
Reference page using APA style
References not older than three years old
RUBRIC

Criteria 1 Advanced
2 points Satisfactory
1.6 points Partial
1.4 points Not Satisfactory
0 points
Analysis of Interview Questions – Explanation of Issues Explanation of issues are stated clearly and described comprehensively delivering all relevant information. All inadequacies are correctly identified.  Explanation of issues are stated clearly and described sufficiently so that understanding is not seriously impeded by slight omissions. Issues are not completely identified or there are omissions in analysis.  Issues are left with ambiguities unexplored or overlooked. Major issues are not identified or there are major omissions in the explanation.  Issues have been unexplored or overlooked.
Analysis of Interview Questions – Conclusions Conclusions are logical, clear and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. Conclusions are logically tied to questions and are identified clearly. Conclusions are not clarified or tied to sufficient information. One or two conclusions are identified clearly. Conclusions are oversimplified or inconsistently tied to parts of information.
Criteria 2 Advanced
2 points Satisfactory
1.6 points Partial
1.4 points Not Satisfactory
0 points
Summary Development – Use credible reasoning and evidence in communication. Concepts and ideas are fully developed and supported with credible sources. Reader can easily follow the author’s logic and reasoning. Concepts and ideas are developed and supported with credible sources.    Summary idea presentation is not cohesive.   At times the writing forces the reader to determine the author’s train of thought. Concepts and themes are not fully developed, presented in a cohesive manner or appropriately supported.
Criteria 3 Advanced
3 points Satisfactory
2.4 points Partial
2.1 points Not Satisfactory
0 points
HR Manager and Principle Question Development Suggested questions are well-written and appropriate. They fully reflect the student’s interview knowledge and skills.  Suggested questions are adequately written and appropriate.  Suggested summary questions are not adequate. They add little to the interview process. Major topics are not addressed.   Suggested questions are inadequate. They do not add value to the interview process.
Criteria 4 Advanced
2 points Satisfactory
1.6 points Partial
1.4 points Not Satisfactory
0 points
Accurate use of resources Incorporate sufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources.  Describes characteristics of essential information resources, including their limitations, and explains strategies for identifying and finding such resources.  Incorporate sufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources.  Does not describe all characteristics of essential information resources, including their limitations, and explains strategies for identifying and finding such resources.  Insufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources. Limited characteristics of essential information and resources presented.  Insufficient use of appropriate research, supporting evidence, and relevant sources.
APA Guidelines for in-text citations and References The paper correctly cites in-text and lists three resources on the References page.  If additional sources are used, they are included correctly. The majority of in-text citations and the reference are properly cited; formatting is inconsistent/inaccurate in a few cases. References are cited but incorrectly under APA style. The student has either used another format or incorrectly applied the APA style guidelines. Inconsistent or missing in-text citations; fails to attribute an author’s word through APA citations.
Writing Mechanics Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including, but not limited to capitalization and punctuation and spelling.  No errors found. No jargon used. Adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling.  One to three errors found. Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling. Over three errors found. Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: Conventions of written English, including capitalization and punctuation and spelling.  Over ten errors found.
Overall Score A
13.5 or more B
12 or more C
10.5 or more Does not meet expectations
0 or more

Implemented in a study like the one listed in the IRB proposal sheet.

2 slides Include the following in your presentation:
The study design
I am choosing Observational studies design: using sub-category of Case-control study design

Attached separately with the homework provided is a IRB proposal sheet that has been filled out, the sheet has all the information regarding what the study is about, please reference this sheet to include the underlying meaning of what the observational design will be used for and how it will be implemented in a study like the one listed in the IRB proposal sheet.
Please be sure that there is a minimum of 3-4 bullet pints on each slide, as well as required speaker notes for each bullet point. (250-word minimum for each slide on the speaker notes)
Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.

Explain how the 6 principles relate to those identified in your analysis of the codes of conduct of the 3 chosen companies.

APA format and references cited in the material
Because of recent financial disasters in the news, the board of directors of your company decided that they wanted to ascertain that the organization’s code of ethics was appropriate and in agreement with the Code of Professional Conduct (CPC) as adopted by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). Therefore, you have been asked to provide this assurance with a report to the CFO of your organization.
Create a report of 3–5 pages including the following:
Review the 6 principles in the AICPA’s CPC.
State what you assess to be the primary purpose of each of the 6 principles.
Analyze the codes of conduct of at least 3 major public U.S. companies.
Include citations for each of these companies’ codes of conduct.
Identify connections and relationships of the principles included.
Explain how the 6 principles relate to those identified in your analysis of the codes of conduct of the 3 chosen companies.
Prepare a recommended list of at least 7 essential elements that must be included in your organization’s code of conduct based on your analysis and assessment.

Discuss the social benefits and costs of protecting IPRs.

The paper must be typed and double-spaced in 12-point font with normal one-inch margins, in which case a 2,500 word document will be approximately 8.5 pages long.

 

All sources used in the paper must be listed alphabetically by author in a “List of References” appearing at the end of the paper. Do not list items that are not cited in the paper. Use a consistent style of footnotes, endnotes or textual references to cite sources. The List of References itself, of course, does not count toward the 2,500 words. Staple the paper at the top left-hand corner. Please do not place the paper in a plastic or cardboard cover or binder of any kind.

 

Topic: Intellectual Property Rights Intellectual property rights (IPRs) – such as patents on scientific innovations and performance rights for artists – are protected in order to ensure that producers have sufficient incentive to invest in the creation of new products that benefit consumers. But new technologies and globalization have made the protection of some IPRs extremely costly. Developing countries, in particular, face a difficult decision in determining how much resources to spend on protecting IPRs. Some analysts argue that a cost-benefit calculation should determine which IPRs are worth protecting and the extent and type of protection that is socially efficient. Discuss the social benefits and costs of protecting IPRs.

 

Sources:

Kobayashi, Bruce H. and Yu, Ben T., “An Economic Analysis of Performance Rights: Some Implications of the Copyright Act of 1976,” Research in Law and Economics, 1995, 17, 237-70.

 

Maskus, Keith E., “The International Regulation of Intellectual Property,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics, 1998, 134(2), 186-208.

 

 

Maskus, Keith E., Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy, Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 2000.

 

Thierer, Adam and Crews, Clyde Wayne, Jr., eds., Copy Fights: The Future of Intellectual Property in the Information Age, Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 2002.

 

 

Liebowitz, Stan J., “Policing Pirates in the Networked Age,” Policy Analysis No. 438, Cato Institute, Washington, D.C., May 15, 2002, http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/policing-pirates-networked-age

 

Einhorn, Michael A. and Rosenblatt, Bill, “Peer-to-Peer Networking and Digital Rights Management: How Market Tools Can Solve Copyright Problems,” Policy Analysis No. 534, Cato Institute, Washington, D.C., February 17, 2005, http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/peerpeer-networking-digital-rightsmanagement-how-market-tools-can-solve-copyright-problems

 

Fink, Carsten and Maskus, Keith E., “Why We Study Intellectual Property Rights and What We Have Learned,” in Carsten Fink and Keith E. Maskus, eds., Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 1-15.

Compare and contrast the terms income and wealth.

Discussion Topic #1
Compare and contrast the terms income and wealth. Use examples in your answer. How does wealth help in giving individuals an unfair advantage?
Discussion Topic #2
The United States is stratified into levels describing individuals’ socioeconomic status: upper class, middle class, working class, and poor. Describe each level. Why is the middle class so difficult to define?
Discussion Topic #3
The functionalist theory of stratification assumes that people are fairly compensated for the amount of time, energy and skills they put into their jobs. What criticisms could one make about this view?
Discussion Topic #4
Give an example of the feminization of poverty in core nations. How is it the same or different in peripheral nations?

Identify an organisation facing a crisis or involved in a public controversy.

 

Identify an organisation facing a crisis or involved in a public controversy (e.g., an accident, a product safety/health hazard, a scandal, an environmental disaster, or a major structural re-organisation, such as privatisation or demutualisation) and investigate how the organisation reacted to it by means of information releases (e.g., press releases, annual report, corporate social responsibility report, etc.). Use a variety of accounting theories to explain the organisation’s response to the event.

 

You can use the organisation’s website to download documents issued by the organisation. Please note that Tutorial 6 (Week 8) will deal with issues surrounding case study selection, data collection and analysis.

 

Structure of assignment

Please follow the structure provided below. Bold numbered items provide the headings and sub-headings for your essay. Bulleted items provide a short description of the type of content expected in each section and sub-section.

 

  1. Introduction
  • Discussion of concepts and theories used to analyse the case [20 marks]
  1. The case

2.1  Context

  • Background information about the case [10 marks]

2.2  Data

  • Description of corporate disclosure vehicles chosen for analysis (i.e., press releases, annual reports, CSR reports, etc.) [10 marks]

2.3  Methodology

  • Discussion of the categories of analysis used to analyse the corporate texts (e.g., text length, themes, impression management strategies, etc.) [15 marks]
  1. Findings
  • Summary of findings of your analysis [35 marks]
  1. Conclusion
  • Discussion of findings in context of theory and prior literature [10 marks]

 

 

Word limit

The word limit is 1,500 words maximum. The case study should include a list of references containing all the materials you have consulted and cited. References in the references section should be mentioned in the text and vice versa.

 

Referencing style

Please use the Harvard referencing style. A detailed guide is provided at: http://www.bangor.ac.uk/library/help/documents/harvardreferencingguide.pdf

 

Assignment of marks

 

You need to demonstrate the application of accounting theories to interpret and analyse your data. You are expected to read around the subject and will be rewarded, if you refer to journal articles or other authoritative sources of information (books and book chapters, NOT websites) to support your argument. Please note that the list of references provided below is just a starting point and is not meant to be exhaustive. The majority of articles are available through the University library. The articles not available through the library have been posted on blackboard.

 

 

First, have chose TALK TALK telecome company regard to the (Cyber attack) and the company response this is the link for the press from the company so you can analysis which theory they are useing

http://www.talktalkgroup.com/press.aspx

 

second you need to read and understand the three theory that in slides ” Systems-oriented theories” that I upload already

 

3rd I have provide you 4 samples for ( Different cases) that could help you I put the grade for each of them so you can use them as sample

 

I don’t want to add more and I don’t want to make it complicated so read the file that I upload and check the samples and if you didn’t understand it please be in touch with me and send me email directly

 

finaly use make sure to use Harvard referencing style

Compare and contrast the types of production processing—job shop, batch, repetitive, or continuous—and determine which the primary mode of operation is and why.

Read “Space Age Furniture Company” in Chapter 9 of your text. Respond to the following and include any Materials Requirement Planning (MRP) calculations:

  1. Develop an MRP for Space Age Furniture Company using the information in the case including the production of sub-assemblies in lot sizes of 1,000.
  2. The lot size of 1,000 for sub-assemblies has produced a lumpy demand for part 3079. Suggest ways for improvements over sub-assemblies in lot sizes of 1,000.
  3. Analyze the trade-off between overtime costs and inventory costs.
  4. Calculate a new MRP that improves the base MRP.
  5. Compare and contrast the types of production processing—job shop, batch, repetitive, or continuous—and determine which the primary mode of operation is and why.
  6. Describe ways that management can keep track of job status and location during production.
  7. Recommend any changes that might be beneficial to the company and/or add value for the customer.

The final case study should demonstrate your understanding of the reading as well as the implications of new knowledge. The paper should integrate readings, scholarly sources, and life experiences. It may include explanation and examples from previous events as well as implications for future applications.

The purpose of the final case study is for you to culminate the learning achieved in the course by describing your understanding and application of knowledge in the field of operations management.

YOU MUST ANSWER EVERY LETTER ABOVE THOROUGHLY PROPERLY….MUST USE PROPER GRAMMAR, PRONUNCIATIONS AND WRITING…

Guidelines for Writing the Final Paper

Writing the Final Paper

The Final Paper:

  1. Must be 10 full double spaced pages in length (not including the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style.
  2. Must include a title page with the following:
    1. Title of paper
    2. Student’s name
    3. Course name and number
    4. Instructor’s name
    5. Date submitted
  3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
  4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
  6. Must use at least five scholarly sources.
  7. Must document all sources in APA style throughout the paper.
  8. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style.

 

YOU MUST READ THE STORY BELOW TO DO THIS FINAL PAPER PROPERLY

 

THIS PAPER IS DUE FRIDAY 11/18/2015 by 11:00 P.M. U.S.A. TIME

Analysis of the case study should be based upon the framework described in Appendix A (See attached file, pages 13-18) Appendix B.

Paper should be 3,500 words, not including references and appendices.

Must contain appropriate reference documentation, works cited, a bibliography and a cover sheet with the title, names of authors, date, course name and word count.

The paper should have page numbers printed at the bottom of the page with the exception of the title page. The page after the title page should start with 2.

Should be typed in 12 point font with one inch margins.

Analysis of the case study should be based upon the framework described in Appendix A (See attached file, pages 13-18) Appendix B (Pages 19-21)

One of the main sources must be from the book “Organizational Change, An action-oriented toolkit. Third edition” by Authors Tupper F. Cawsey, Gene Deszca, and Cynthia Ingols. ISBN 9781483359304

Comments from Support Team: Discipline: Business Studies: Management 395 Team Building and Organizational

Describe why your product or service is price sensitive or price insensitive •

Prepare a 3 – 4 page double-spaced paper that evaluates and recommends distribution channels, pricing, and competitive differentiation. Support your discussion with three academic sources, which may include your textbook, and/or credible business journals such as Barrons, Wall Street Journal and Business Week. Your analysis should include:

 

 

Distribution Channels:

• Identify two (2) or more potential distribution channels for your product or service, and discuss three (3) advantages and three (3) disadvantages of each channel; support your analysis with two or more academic sources. Select and justify which channel is best and why.

• Discuss how you would use e-business to support and enhance your chosen channel. Be specific as to what you would do and how you would do it; support your analysis with data.

Pricing:

• Describe why your product or service is price sensitive or price insensitive • Identify and discuss three (3) factors that would influence how to set the price for your product or service, and recommend a competitive pricing structure supporting your analysis with data.

Competition:

• Discuss how the distribution channel, e-business and pricing strategy will differentiate your product or service from your closest competitor; be specific supporting your analysis with data.