| ints: 250 |
Assignment 5: Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages and Answers |
| Criteria |
Unacceptable
Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D |
Fair
70-79% C |
Proficient
80-89% B |
Exemplary
90-100% A |
| 1. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.
Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
Insufficiently revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
Partially revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
Satisfactorily revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
Thoroughly revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
| 2. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.
Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
Insufficiently revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
Partially revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
Satisfactorily revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
Thoroughly revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates. |
| 3. Included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.
Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. |
Insufficiently included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. |
Partially included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. |
Satisfactorily included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. |
Thoroughly included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. |
| 4. State, explain, and support the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one (1) paragraph.
Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and did not submit or incompleted provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph. |
Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and insufficiently provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph. |
Partially stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and partially provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph. |
Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and satisfactorily provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph. |
Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and thoroughly provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph. |
| 5. State, explain, and support the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one or two (1 or 2) paragraphs.
Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and did not submit or incompletely provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and insufficiently provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Partially stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and partially provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and satisfactorily provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and thoroughly provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
| 6. Include one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.
Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage. |
Insufficiently included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage. |
Partially included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage. |
Satisfactorily included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage. |
Thoroughly included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage. |
| 7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences. |
Insufficiently used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences. |
Partially used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences. |
Satisfactorily used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences. |
Thoroughly used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences. |
| 8. Provide a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Repeat or paraphrase your thesis statement.
Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Did not submit or incompletely repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement. |
Insufficiently provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Insufficiently repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement. |
Partially provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Partially repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement. |
Satisfactorily provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Satisfactorily repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement. |
Thoroughly provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Thoroughly repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement. |
| 9. Develop a coherently structured paper with Use effective transitional words, phrases, sentences, and an introduction, body, and conclusion.
Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Insufficiently developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Partially developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Satisfactorily developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Thoroughly developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
| 10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.
Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims. |
Insufficiently used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims. |
Partially used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims. |
Satisfactorily used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims. |
Thoroughly used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims. |
| 11. Support disadvantages and answers with at least two (2) additional quality relevant references. Use at least eight (8) total for Parts 1, 2, and 3.
Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices. |
Meetsnumber of required references; all references high quality choices. |
| 12. Clarity, writing mechanics, and APA formatting requirements (including in-text citations and reference page)
Weight: 25% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors pres |