Author: chris

Term paper Topic: What factors in China and the U.S. contribute to the trade deficits

Introduction – 1/2 page or about 1 paragraph
What is the problem that needs to be addressed?  You will want to include the “solution” at the end of this introduction as your thesis statement or answer to the question (see below).

Background – 1/2 page or about 1 paragraph
What is the history of the problem?

Issues – 1 page (briefly state them in about 1 paragraph each)
What are at least three-four issues within the problem?  Be aware of the themes (our weekly content) for the course and try to choose issues that dovetail with the course themes.

Research and Analysis Questions – answer these questions in the remaining 6 pages.  Use the subheadings provided in order to give your reader a roadmap!

Complicating Issues
What is getting in the way of a solution?  Fully explain two-three complications.

Possible Solutions
How could the problem be solved?  Provide a few different ideas from various theoretical viewpoints studied in the course.  Back them up with research that you have found.

Recommendation –
Given the complicating factors, what is the best solution?  Why? Back up your ideas with research or an analogous model (something that has worked in a slightly similar situation that you could apply to this problem).

Summary – Anticipated Outcome
What effect will the solution have on the problem?  (Be sure to summarize problem in its entirety in the summary, including the solution and anticipated outcome.)

This basic outline presents an executive summary when all questions are answered.  An executive summary is a very short document that sums up the problem and the solution.  In its most effective form, an executive summary should only be one page long.  The summary is placed at the beginning of a report or paper so that the “problem” and “answer” are easily identifiable for the reader.  Of course, the more detailed report follows – but it also uses the basic outline above.  In short, the executive summary really is the condensed version of the full report.  Whether you work in business, for the government, or any other organization, you will use this form often to identify, understand, and solve problems.  You may not always write it out formally, but your decision-making process will be constructed in a similar way.

Remember:  All research papers need to have a thesis statement – which is answer to your research question.  You may not really know what your overall “answer” or thesis is until you’ve written the first draft of the paper.  That is okay.  Go back to compose your introductory paragraph to include the thesis. To see more on how to compose a thesis statement, see “Developing A Thesis Statement.”  You are writing an explanatory research paper.  It is important to write in third person (not first) in a formal paper.  Take yourself out of the paper as much as possible.  Present arguments with supporting research that is logical and solid, showing that you understand the issue at hand and the theoretical IR concepts behind it.

Your overall paper will be no fewer and no more than eight pages (plus a References List that does not count toward the limit), double-spaced, 12 point font in Times New Roman, Calibri, or Arial typeface.  You will definitely find a lot of information on your topic.  Therefore, it is an art to write to the limit of eight pages.

choose a publicly listed company that follow IFRS, find the book value and market value from the most recent publised annual report, explain the reasons of the differences and gives at least 4 acadamic reference

Choose a publicly listed company that follow IFRS, find the book value and market value from their most recent annual report, explain the reason of difference of 2 values and give at least 4 acadamic references.  For UK university course work, that need to write in UK english.  Consisted 1,200 words in words 2003-2007 microsoft version.

Research paper Topic: why gay marriage is inevitable

1.http://books.google.com/books?id=l0SqzL8dOTUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Same-Sex+Marriage:+Moral+Wrong+Or+Civil+Right?&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PRQVUfnWG6T90gHBwICgAg&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA

2.http://books.google.com/books?id=D63iTQrXQsQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Politics+of+Same-Sex+Marriage&hl=en&sa=X&ei=BRQVUd-lKtCH0QHjsoDgBg&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=The%20Politics%20of%20Same-Sex%20Marriage&f=false

3.http://books.google.com/books?id=_6pUdYi6nTUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Legalizing+Gay+Marriage:+Vermont+And+The+National+Debate&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xxMVUbbTA7OP0QGD_oCwCA&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Legalizing%20Gay%20Marriage%3A%20Vermont%20And%20The%20National%20Debate&f=false

4.http://books.google.com/books?id=hGbwxmFIWO0C&pg=PP1&lpg=PP1&dq=Gay+Marriage

5.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ofs&AN=84690211&site=ehost-live

6.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=n5h&AN=2W62822486838&site=ehost-live

7.http://find.galegroup.com/gic/infomark.do?&source=gale&idigest=619cc97d40326802b25b175f99cf1e19&prodId=GIC&userGroupName=dist214&tabID=T006&docId=CJ147924997&type=retrieve&contentSet=IAC-Documents&version=1.0

8.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lfh&AN=83435596&site=ehost-live

Klarman, Michael. “Why Gay Marriage Is Inevitable.” Los Angeles Times

10.http://find.galegroup.com/gic/infomark.do?&source=gale&idigest=619cc97d40326802b25b175f99cf1e19&prodId=GIC&userGroupName=dist214&tabID=&docId=CP3208520049&type=retrieve&contentSet=GREF&version=1.0

Case study Topic: LAW

falsification of document:
Once falsifying a document and realize the actual issuer of the document on how long you can inform against the police; Τhe accuasiation take place 6 months after
with spot will defend laws in court
The accused admitted the falcification of the document but had no real benefit of this action .

Geneva Legislations-European law- Lisbon Tready

Critical thinking Topic: Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent

Think about whether you might have ever committed that fallacy or whether you might have been victimized by that fallacy. In either or both cases, describe the situation. What was the fallacious reasoning? What happened as a result?. What might you have done differently to have avoided making that mistake?. What might the other person have done differently so that you would not have been victimized by their fallacious reasoning?