“Discuss and critically evaluate the evidence for shifting patterns of the global burden of disease; compare patterns across low, middle, and high income countries; and outline the implications of these changing patterns.”
View the Working in Teams video
Before responding to the questions, view the video as many times as necessary to familiarize yourself with the characters and the issues as they relate to the objectives of this module. Define the three criteria for evaluating effective team/group work (as stated in your text) and analyze whether the “team” in the video is effective or not. Provide a review of Tuckman’s five stages of group formation and evaluate the stages of the individuals in the video. Explain your answer. Review your text on the specific types of task, maintenance, and dysfunctional roles in teams, and identify who is playing what specific role in the video. Explain your answer. Based upon what you saw in the Working in Teams video, would you say that these individuals are a group or a team? Explain your answer. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Use at least two academic resources as references for this assignment. Also the book is online so I would be able to provide the book to you
describing the various entertainment functions of Seminole Hard Rock casino resort. Research and discuss how it fits and compares in the market place and the economic impact it creates.
Below are the paper Scope:
1. Casino
a. Name of the casino, location, and size (number of employees, number of hotel rooms, size of casino floor, number of slot machines, number of table games, etc.).
b. Discuss how your casino has expanded compared to the competing casinos.
c. List and describe the various amenities offered at your casino.
d. Who owns and operates your casino?
e. What “theme” does your casino have, if any.
2. History
a. When was your casino resort established and what were the expansion phases?
b. List three significant events that have occurred in your casino’s history and explain why these three events were the most significant. Do not include the opening ceremony of your property.
c. Make a comparative analysis of your casinos growth development and size (% or graph) today and compared to five years ago, ten years ago, etc.
d. Who are the three main competitors and how does each one compete for market-share?
3. Management
a. Who owns the casino and how did they start? What is their background?
b. What were or are their main vision for the casino and the surrounding community?
c. Using specific examples in the casinos history, explain if the owners are doing a good or a bad job in accomplishing their vision.
d. What casino positions will remain in the future and which positions do you think will become obsolete? Discuss and give reasons for your assumptions.
4. Operations
a. Design an organizational chart of your casino, listing the department and the basic position structure (e.g. line employees, supervisors, managers, directors, etc.).
b. List which departments are the oldest and which have been added on later.
c. Discuss how the operational structure impacts the various gaming/enterprise issues of your casino and its overall success.
d. Discuss at least two new trends that show the changing casino environment.
5. Marketing and Casino Marketing
a. Discuss what internal and external marketing your casino does (brochures, website, billboards, TV/radio ads, print ads, etc.)
b. What is your casino’s “target” customer (male or female, age range, ethnicity, etc).
c. What type of loyalty program does your casino have? What are the benefits to the program (e.g. why would a customer want to use the player’s club card?).
6. Summary
a. Discuss to what extent your casino should be considered as part of the hospitality industry. Chose your viewpoint with focus on one of the following aspects:
i. Economical reasons
ii. Political reasons
iii. Sociological reasons
iv. Ethical reasons
Paper 3: Living in a Contradiction
Agnieszka Goeller
Basic Composition with Reading (Section RR)
Spring 2013
Reading: Adam Gopnik, “Bumping into Mr. Ravioli” and one of the following:
Sherry Turkle, “Alone Together”
Janet Flammang, “The Taste of Civilization: Food, Politics, and Civil Society”
Why are we so busy if we wish to have time for our friends and other things we keep postponing? Why do we wall ourselves off from others with technology and then complain of loneliness and lack of intimacy? Why do we pine for authenticity, and yet live lives that are often deeply inauthentic, untrue to who we are? Why are we so unproductive amidst tools to increase our productivity? Why do we long for human conversation only to reduce it to utilitarian communication? In other words, the puzzle is how we manage to live in the gap between what we wish for and what we get.
Use specific quotes, examples and details from the text in developing your response. (you have a choice of working with either Gopnik and Flammang, or Gopnik and Turkle)
Here are some questions you might consider to help get started or to develop your ideas. They are intended to help you begin thinking about your paper. Do not organize your paper as series of answers to these questions. You do not even have to answer all of them; however, if you don’t have ideas about these questions, you’re not ready to write your paper.
1. Try to answer at least some of the questions that are at the opening of this essay assignment. Why are we so busy, when we are sick of busyness? What is the ideal that we would like to have? What is the force–inner or outer—that is preventing us from achieving what we want?
2. Discuss busyness itself in terms of a strategy for dealing with a disparity between what should be and what is. Is busyness a kind of compromise (of what?), an adaptation (to what?), or is there a different word that could describe it as a strategy?
3. How can we see Gopnik’s embrace of busyness as “our art form, our civic ritual, our way of being us” (160) as a strategy for dealing with the gap between the ideal and the real? What are the larger implications of Gopnik’s approach? How could this approach/strategy be used for dealing with the other problems or gaps observed and discussed in the other essays?
4. Consider the three essays as offering their own perspectives as to how to deal with the gap or disparity described in them. First, analyze if they see the gap as a problem that can be surmounted, or if it is not some more fundamental contradiction that cannot be “solved.” Then, search for hints of an approach suggested by the essay vis a vis that gap/contradiction. Does the essay suggest a very active approach (seeking change), or one that seeks compromise and adaptation? What does Flammang suggest we do to bring reality more in line with what we actually wish for our society? What are the elements in her approach? Could they work for the problems represented in business?
The Case Study:- Able Co. manufactures a range of cables and harnesses, some to a high level of complexity, for customers in the transportation and computer industries.
The article review will consist of a paper of between 5 and 7 pages in length plus a cover page (typed, double
spaced, 12‐point font), which describes (1 page maximum), and then discusses (3‐ 5 pages) the methodology,
strengths and limitations of an original research (not a theoretical article) article, and concludes with a one page
discussion of possible “next steps” in the development of the research described in the article.