Write your own contemporary epic poem. Remember, the great epics of early civilization, like The Odyssey, Baghavad-gita, or The Book of Songs, were meant to reflect the values and beliefs of a society—how a civilization wished to see itself and represent itself to the world and future generations.

Write your own contemporary epic poem. Remember, the great epics of early civilization, like The
Odyssey, Baghavad-gita, or The Book of Songs, were meant to reflect the values and beliefs of a society—how
a civilization wished to see itself and represent itself to the world and future generations. What would
your contemporary epic be about? What part of our society—what values and beliefs—would it
represent and what would your message be? Write 3-5 pages of your epic (more is okay but not
necessary) and then, in an essay of 4-5 pages, compare your epic to The Odyssey and The Book of Songs. In
what ways were you inspired by Homer and/or the ancient Chinese poets—their characterizations,
details, imagery, voice, and poetic conventions?

Magna Carta is often viewed as the start of the evolutionary non-codified UK constitution.Critically discuss this statement Critically discuss this statement.

2015 is the 800th anniversary of the signing of Magna Carta.
Magna Carta is often viewed as the start of the evolutionary non-codified UK constitution. Now is the time for work to begin on producing for the UK a fully codified Constitution.

Critically discuss this statement.

and when you answer can you be:
1 generally accurate
2 providing an adequate answer to the question based largely on textbooks
3 clearly presented

What lessons or themes did the site impress upon you in review of Ronald Reagan Library and how were these themes presented to visitors?

What lessons or themes did the site impress upon you? How were these themes presented to vistors? Was the site easy to get to? Was parking reasonable? Was the site visitor friendly? Were the docents friendly and helpful? Was the book shop well done? Was the visit worthwhile or worth the cost? Explain. These might be some issues that you might want to include in your critique, but you do not have to restrict yourselves to these issues

Your brief is to design and develop a project plan to lead MSc students at HUBS(Hull Business School) on a study tour of the UK automotive industry.

1. Your brief is to design and develop a project plan to lead MSc students at HUBS(Hull Business School) on a study tour of the UK automotive industry. You should assume there are 100 students. The manufacturing plants to be visited are located in the towns of Sunderland, Oxford, Dagenham and Solihull. You need to outline clear objectives for the study tour and determine an appropriate budget. You should describe project stakeholders and establish clearly defined project objectives that complement the overall aims of the HUBS MSc degree programmes. You should define and discuss how Statements of Work (SOW), Work Breakdown Structures (WBS), Organisational Breakdown Structures (OBS), risk management, budgeting, resource planning and scheduling each contribute to the project plan. You should show how these interact with each other and are used when managing a project’s implementation.

An entrepreneur developing a new business idea and trying to find a gap in the market.

Question:An entrepreneur developing a new business idea and trying to find a gap in the market
Many entrepreneurs have the drive to take on a new or failing business(in the public or private sector)and make them a success。 identify a real life example of this type of venture and propose an entrepreneurial strategy that would enable your chosen entrepreneur to compete effectively in the current market place

Relationship of managers with workers and workers relation with customers how it helps the success of business.

1. Introduction (Why is this important, what is it about) (200 word count)
a. Research topic/(*research question(s)).
b. Research aims and objectives.
2. Background/Literature Review (Where is this idea is coming from) (350 word count)
a. *(Research question(s) should come here after setting the context of your work
upon presenting the background.
b. TO Note: The research question(s) may be presented in the Introduction instead of  in the Background if a much broader introduction is presented.
3. Intended Methodology (400 words count)
a. Research philosophy
b. How the data will be collected (MUST include the collection of primary data).
c. How the sampling will be done.
d. How the data will be analysed.
4. Conclusion (100 words)
5. References (not included in word count)
Some general guidelines:

Agree or disagree with the following statement: Despite the diversity of media through which they expressed their views, anti-war proponents shared similar beliefs about why the war was wrong and why it should end.

Paper 2: The War in Vietnam
Perhaps more than any other conflict in U.S. history, the Vietnam War divided the nation as it elicited debates over U.S. foreign policy in Southeast Asia. A diverse range of people increasingly opposed the Vietnam War, and used an array of tactics and texts to persuade fellow citizens to end the conflict. In addition to the numerous marches and protests, anti-war proponents created a tremendous archive of documents that express how and why they felt the Vietnam War was unnecessary, illegitimate, and/or immoral.
In this paper, students will assess and evaluate the rationales for why people in the 1960s and early 1970s opposed the Vietnam War. The goal of this paper is not to take a side in this debate; rather, it is to try to understand the arguments against the war made at the time. To do so, students will engage with the three texts:
Peter Davis (director), Hearts and Minds
John Kerry, Testimony to Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Julian Bond/SNCC, Vietnam: An Antiwar Comic
As students analyze these texts, they should consider the following questions: Was there a consensus amongst people who opposed the Vietnam War? Did they agree as to why they understood the war to be unnecessary, illegitimate, or immoral? Did they agree about why the U.S. was fighting in Vietnam and why it was urgent to end the war? Did they view the U.S. in a similar light? The Vietnamese? Did they similarly understand the impact of the war on U.S. soldiers? Did they have shared views about the role of U.S. military officials and political leaders? Did they draw on similar rhetorical appeals to persuade their audiences of the need to end the war?