Project description
Please considered the brexit , it will have both opportunities and challenges to Chinese entrepreneurs.
Please use the pass rate of the UK Tier 1 entrepreneurship visa for the past two or three years. It is been declined which makes Chinese entrepreneurs find more difficulties at the beginning.
Please use the reference of STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP( fourth edition) by Philip A Wickham.
Please use the reference of ENTREPRENEURSHIP PERSPECTIVE AND CASES by Paul Westhead, Mike Wright and Gerard McElwee.
Please use the reference of innovation and entrepreneurship by Jphn Bessant and Joe Tidd.
Please use this very important Journal as a reference: \”Who is an Entrepreneur?\” Is the wrong Question. by William B. Gartner. This is a very important piece of work from the supervisor that must be included in the dissertation. If you cannot find this article, please rind me anytime that I can scan it to you straight away.
The Marking Scheme is as following:
Overall Marks
Objectives and Rationale
5%
An. Framework/ Literature Review
30%
Methodology
15%
Analysis & Interpretation of Findings 30%
Conclusions & Recommendations
15%
Structure & Presentation
5%
80100% Excellent
Distinction
Excellent background, issue definition, objectives and rationale
The literature review is comprehensive with excellent critical evaluation and conclusions & analytical framework
Excellent understanding of methodological issues & limitations, excellent justification of methods and research instrument
Complex and sophisticated analysis & interpretation of the material, excellent integration with literature and objectives, and critical discussion of value and limitations of data.
Excellent conclusions, sophisticated discussion of achievement of objectives, research issues, ways forward and very good critical reflection on the process
Excellent Structure, excellent use of language and presentation with full and accurate Harvard referencing
70-79% Very good
Distinction
Clear and specific about research question, objectives clear, feasible and appropriate, very well justified by very good & relevant background information
The literature is cogently described and evaluated with good critique and conclusions identifying gaps and issues, good analytical framework
Good understanding of methodological issues & limitations, research methods clearly justified against alternatives and good research instrument
Results are presented very clearly and analysed and interpreted in a sophisticated manner, referring back to the literature and clearly focused on the objectives with good critical reflection on limitations
Conclusions are clear with sophisticated discussion in terms of achievement of objectives and useful reflection on process
Good Structure, very good presentation and use of language with full and accurate Harvard referencing
60-69% Good
Commendation
Clear research issue; good background objectives are clear, feasible and appropriate with good rationale
The literature is cogently evaluated with some critique and useful conclusions related to analytical framework
Research Methods are clear and justified with consideration of alternatives, understanding of limitations and acceptable research instrument
Results are presented fully and analysed and interpreted effectively with clear links back to the objectives and the literature with reflection on limitations
Conclusions are clear and discussed well in terms of the achievement of the objectives with reflection on process
Good structure, presentation and use of language with full and largely accurate Harvard referencing
50-59% Competent Pass level
Clear research issue & appropriate background. Objectives clear but some issues about scope, fit with the rationale, feasibility
Fair description of appropriate field(s) of literature. Some general conclusions, weak evaluation of concepts & analytical framework
Research Methods used are clear with some limited justification and understanding of issues and limitations, acceptable research instrument
Results are presented fully and clearly with some limited internal analysis and interpretation
Conclusions are clear and straightforward and discussed to some extent in terms of objectives
Adequate Structure, acceptable presentation and language with some errors of grammar, spelling & punctuation, adequate Harvard referencing with some errors
40-49% Borderline fail
Interesting topic and gives background but the research question is very broad and the objectives unclear or too broad
Inadequate description of the appropriate field(s) of literature, and/or no criticism or evaluation
Research methods are clear but no justification for methods chosen and little or no understanding issues & limitations, weak research instrument
Results are presented fully and clearly but with no real analysis or interpretation
Conclusions are unclear or perfunctory; objectives not clearly achieved and no discussion of issues or critique of process 4
Poor structure, presentation, & use of language, or acceptable presentation but poor referencing
40% Fail
Background given but Objectives and rationale unclear or not stated
The author appears to have read little and understood less
Research Methods unclear, little or no evidence of methodology understanding, v. weak research instrument
Results are presented incompletely with no real interpretation or analysis
Conclusions are unclear or not related to research findings and literature, objectives not achieved
Unacceptable structure, presentation, or referencing
