In a short story ‘Groom Service’ by Michael Dorris and ‘The Return’ by Ngugi Wa Thiong’o, explore how the two works are similar and different in terms of the situations and themes they present.

Please make sure the writer read the short story ‘Groom Service’ by Michael Dorris and ‘The Return’ by Ngugi Wa Thiong’o. These are two short stories that have a common theme. In an essay, explore how the two works are similar and different in terms of the situations and themes they present. Write a 5 paragraph essay.

In many senses, Internet memes can be treated as (post)modern folklore, in which shared norms and values are constructed through cultural artifacts such as Photoshopped images or urban legends?.

While memes are seemingly trivial and mundane artifacts, they actually reflect deep social and cultural structures. In many senses, Internet memes can be treated as (post)modern folklore, in which shared norms and values are constructed through cultural artifacts such as Photoshopped images or urban legends. (Shifman 15)
Shifman suggests that examining a single meme is less revealing than evaluating “the common ideas and forms shared by many” (15). Look up 10+ examples of a popular meme (such as ten examples of Bad Luck Brian). What “shared norms and values” are conveyed by users who post or forward this meme? What is the joke or what message does this category of memes generally convey? Evaluate what makes this meme type popular. (Who uses it? When? Where? Why? etc.)
You may look up memes you know using Google image search https://www.google.com/imghp or scroll through the choices at a popular meme hub like Know Your Meme http://knowyourmeme.com/memes. Your journal should be at least a page handwritten (¾ a page typed) and should include images or links to at least 3 representative examples to support your analysis.

Create a summary about ford company from different books.

Create a summary about ford company from different books. Please follow the examples in the attachment file. Questions to be answered in the summary: 1. What is the main point and purpose of the source 2. What type of source are you presenting. 3. How might this particular source help in the specific research you are doing. ______________________________

Write a summary of the books “|All god’s children; the bosket family and American tradition of violence (butterfield, 2008)”.

Need to choose one of the questions from the uploaded document and critically analyze and respond the question.
There are two books that need to be used, there can not be used any other source than this two books.
Book: All god’s children; the bosket family and American tradition of violence (butterfield, 2008)
this is the book to be analyze.
The second book is a text book : Juvenile Delinquency; A sociological Aproach 9th edition ISBN10:0205246532
also I attached a document with the theories and pg number, those are the only theories that can be used. I need in text citations with pg numbers throughout the essay.

Write an essay that puts forth an argument about the meaning, vision or interpretation of justice and/or judgment in one of the following works: Antigone by Sophocles translated by Robert Fagles, The Tempest by William Shakespeare edited by Barbara A. Mowart or Beloved by Toni Morrison.

This assignment asks you to write an essay that puts forth an argument about the meaning, vision or interpretation of justice and/or judgment in one of the following works: Antigone by Sophocles translated by Robert Fagles, The Tempest by William Shakespeare edited by Barbara A. Mowart or Beloved by Toni Morrison. The basic building of this essay will be close reading specific passages from your chosen text. You must also draw on 2-3 contexts from different sources that help support and modify your interpretation of the text and its ideas about justice and/ or judgment.
Some tips:
– Think about the following questions when building your thesis statement: What is justice? How do we determine what is right and wrong? Through which kind of processes should we choose-and enforce –these definitions? How should we negotiate tensions between the individual and the collective?
– Be certain that your argument has a clear “so what” factor that articulates the consequences of your thesis—why your argument matters. What does your argument teach us? What does it help us to see? How does it clarify our thinking about justice and/ or judgment? The “So what” factor should be the final sentence of your thesis as it appears at the beginning of the essay, and you should explore this component of the argument more fully in the conclusion of your essay.
– Your contexts(other literary sources) can be anything (Philosophical treatise, another work of literature, film, image, historical document, etc) The kinds of contexts you choose should emerge from your interest in the text: what questions/aspects/dimensions of the literary work concern you, what you want to know more about, etc.
– The evidence for your argument is the language of the texts. You will thus need to cite your passages, as well as other relevant portions of your texts, to support your claim
– NB: your primary text should be either Antigone by Sophocles translated by Robert Fagles or The Tempest by William Shakespeare Edited by Barbara A. Mowart.
Argument: Basic Features:
 Assertion: claim about meaning
 Evidence: specific proof/example in the text
 Significance: contextual/external relevance
 Addresses content and form: what and how
 Addresses so what (how is the claim supported, why do we care)
 What + how + so what= argumentative thesis
EXPECTATIONS:
This assignment asks you to craft a focused beginning, constructing a clear and sophisticated argument; employing the skills of close reading to support and develop your argument; setting up and following up quotations properly; and articulating a “So what” factor. Remember to also craft focused paragraphs with clear topic sentences that signal how the paragraph moves the argument forward. Finally, compose a conclusion that explores your “So what” factor. And, always strive to achieve clarity, complexity, and precision in the argument, evidence, and analysis you put forth.