How is the Rhetorical Triangle (audience, speaker and situation) affected when the location of the presentation is online?

DB-3
The Rhetorical Triangle and Online Presentations
Based on your earlier analysis of video presentations and the Rhetorical Triangle, write a 3-4 paragraph opinion essay answering the following question:
How is the Rhetorical Triangle (audience, speaker and situation) affected when the location of the presentation is online?
For example, consider the following questions:
• How can the speaker create a connection with an online audience (especially if the speaker cannot be seen)?
• How are audience reactions and distractions different in an online presentation?
• Situation also includes the topic as well as the location. How does the online location affect the choice and effectiveness of the topic?

Write a short paragraph about the economic systems, demand and supply,the US economy, fiscal policy ,federal budget.

The article should be about macroeconomics, you can either talk about the economic systems, demand and supply,the US economy, fiscal policy ,federal budget rite a short paragraph aborite a short paragraph about ut etc.
And then write a short paragraph about why do you think this article is interesting or why do you think this is important information.

Symbolism in “Hills Like White Elephants”.

Symbolism in “Hills Like White Elephants” will be a RESEARCH ESSAY. Instead of using your opinions, you’ll find three criticisms to cite in the paper (A criticism is an essay, chapter, or article that analyzes, explains, or interprets different aspects of the story; the term criticism doesn’t suggest negative ideas.)The paper should be 2 – 3 typed pages written in MLA format. In your text. There’s a model of “Miss Brill” that you should study and use as a guide for writing your paper. Notice the upper right and left margins of the paper——–everything in the paper is double spaced; set your word processor on double spacing and it won’t need to be changed.————-Font size should be Times New Roman .12.—————-The last page should be a Works Cited page where you will list, alphabetically, the three sources you use.——————–You should summarize the critics’ ideas IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Even though you are not quoting the critic, you are using the ideas so you still need to give credit to that critic. If you quote the critic, you should do so sparingly, no long quotes. If you mention the critic’s name in the narrative, you’ll list only the page number in parentheses (22). If you don’t name the critic, you’ll list the name and page number in parentheses (Warren 22). You’ll see examples of this in the model essay. ——————-Let me know if you have questions about this paper.

Critically evaluate the key process of strategic management applied by MasterCard.

The Case: Mastering the Strategic Plan….Priceless
Assignment tasks:
1. Critically evaluate the key process of strategic management applied by MasterCard;
2. Analyze which theories and perspectives of corporate strategies used by MasterCard and appraise them appropriately based on the industry’s anticipated growth rate;
3. Explain what important strategic plan would be needed to actually hold the event (short term, long term or both). Demonstrate the ability to communicate and apply appropriate problem solving techniques.
This assignment will assess learning outcomes:
1. Demonstrate a systematic understanding and critical evaluation of the key aspects of the strategic management process;
2. Demonstrate the ability to compare different theories and perspectives of strategic management and use and appraise them appropriately;
3. Critically evaluate theories and concepts of strategic management. Analyse and apply appropriate problem solving techniques plus knowledge learned to solving complex business problems;
4. Demonstrate the ability to communicate complex issues.

Strategy of the antelopes research Paper

The Paper
Does the introduction give the basic information (dates, locations, basic desription of topic)?
Does the paper go beyond just reporting what happened?
Is the thesis clealy stated?
Does the information in the paper relate to it?
Are there connections to the thesis at the end of the body paragraphs?
Are quotes set up and explained.
Does the paper contain all relevant dates?
Are events/people adequately explained?
Citations
Are there at least two scholarly sources and a primary source?
Does the paper have in-text citations?
Is MLA or APA format used consistantly throughtout.
Other Stuff
Make sure that there is no first person

Maker sure that there are no questions.
Make sure that there are not basic grammar/usage errors.

Identify the ethical compromises that took place during Sheri Fink’s story of the Katrina disaster,from personnel issues, structural failures, political battles and ethical compromises.

Q- After reading Sheri Fink’s story of the Katrina disaster, it is easy to identify all the ways “the system” failed. Everything from personnel issues, structural failures, political battles and ethical compromises were evident throughout the article. Your assignment for this week is to identify the ethical compromises that took place during this crisis. Using the guidelines from the syllabus, address the following questions:
1. Before the body of your response, write an abstract of the article–if you don’t know how to do this, the APA manual can help.
2, What was the single most compelling ethical conflict (in your opinion) that happened during Katrinia that was described in the article? [There were many ethical conflicts, only address ONE). Be sure to include names within the article/health care roles and specifics (patients, situation)of the ethical failure. What failed, why? how? when? Identify various perspectives of the ethical conflict (pros and cons).
3. How could the ethical conflict that you identified have been prevented? Offer your perspective from an advanced nursing perspective. 
It is only necessary to write about ONE ethical situation but there needs to be details, critical analysis and thoughtful reflection.

Create a Diversity Office.

Shortly after the CNO (Chief Nurse Officer) completed her annual performance appraisal and salary evaluations, as required by the Joint Commission; you are confronted by a minority female RN that claims that her wages are substantially less than her male RN counterpart who is performing the exact same job in the oncology department. She feels as if she is being discriminated against. You realize you have no procedures in place to address these issues. Although minorities continue to be underrepresented within the healthcare workforce, your healthcare systems has continued to diversify with an increased number of ethnic and racial employees. You are aware that minorities and women will continue to comprise the highest percentage of new entrants into the labor force. You also notice that this is a pattern as this is the fourth employee that has confronted you with an issue regarding diversity (i.e. specifically differences in racial, ethnic and cultural backgrounds) in the last six weeks from the oncology department.\n\nDirections: Create a 15-20 slide PowerPoint Presentation to make a recommendation to the CEO to create a diversity office. The presentation should include the following:\n\nExplanation of the issues associated with awarding pay increases as it relates to performance appraisal to ensure consistency.\nIdentification of components of compensation.\nDetermination of the impact on diversity in the healthcare organization.\nDiscussion of the role leadership plays in managing diversity and strategies to employ to effectively manage diversity\nIdentification of major laws impacting the healthcare industry as it relates to hiring, terminating, and discriminating against employees.

Describe the relevance of the nursing research problem addressed in a Systematic Research Review on pressure ulcer practice.

TOPIC: Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR) on pressure ulcer
1. Describe the relevance of the nursing research problem addressed in a Systematic Research Review on pressure ulcer practice. (CO 3, 6)
2. Critique the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR, specifically the designs of the studies included. (CO 6)
3. Critique the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. (CO 6)
4. Describe the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR. (CO 3, 6)
5. Critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current practice and future research. (CO 3, 6)
6. Utilize the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to locate a true SRR for this assignment.
7. Paper length should be between 4-6 pages.