Author: chris

Details of complete assignment content, deliverables and rubric
Quality Measurement Proposal
For this assignment, you are required to write a word paper on methods of quality measurement.
Your paper must include a detailed summary of at least two different methods of quality measurement used by your target organization. Include examples of how the methods may be used to improve organizational effectiveness. Give an evaluation of these methods and indicate when they should be used for best results.
Cite at least four references in addition to your readings to validate your proposal. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines.

• Begin each writing assignment by identifying the question number you are answering followed by the actual question itself (in bold type).

• Use a standard essay format for responses to all questions (i.e., an introduction, middle paragraphs and conclusion).

• Responses must be submitted as a MS Word Document only, typed double-spaced, using a standard font (i.e. Times New Roman) and 12 point type size

Subject: The Engineer as Ethical Actor
1- Attachments:
• 8 articles that should be the only resources.
• My Response paper #1
• Grading criteria
2- Plagiarism and paraphrasing:
The last time I ordered from this website I got in trouble with my instructor and he accused me that I am stealing ideas, and that I used outer resources. Moreover, that I copied the same exact sentences from a certain website. Please, I can’t have the same problem this time and I need everything to be clear. He told me that I used the same words when paraphrasing which is not acceptable and if I needed to add a quote or paraphrase something then I have to cite everything correctly. Please, I don’t want to get in trouble.
3- The instructor suggested that I use this thesis statement because it is a very strong statement. This thesis was my first response’s paper thesis statement, but I changed it according to my instructor’s instructions.

Thesis Statement: “The relationship with other people is very essential to every engineer’s life, even though the professional societies have completely ignored ethics in an engineer’s profession.”
4- Language: I need my paper to be with standard and simple English language. Also, I need the paper’s language style and way of writing to be similar to the attached Response paper #1.
5- Focus: For response paper #2, you will create and defend an argument focused on the topic “The Engineer as Ethical Actor.” What that argument will be depends on how you interpret the topic, as well as what you believe to be important and relevant. There are numerous possibilities that can be used: but it is very important that you 1) actually have an argument/position, 2) that you explicate this argument and show why it is correct, and 3) that you defend this argument against likely counterargument. You do not need to focus on a literature review – Response Paper #1 served that purpose – but use the articles as a resource of supporting your argument, providing possible counterarguments, and so forth.
6- Resources: I am not allowed to use any OUTER resources and those eight articles attached are the only resources I can use. Please, citations must be used carefully and using APA style.
1) Downey, Gary Lee, Juan C. Lucena, and Carl Mitcham. “Engineering Ethics and Identity: Emerging
Initiatives in Comparative Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics. 13:4 (December 2007) 463-487.
2) Harris, Charles E. “The Good Engineer: Giving Virtue its Due in Engineering Ethics” Science and
Engineering Ethics 14:2 (June 2008) 153-164.
3) Lynch, William and Kline Ronald. “Engineering Practice and Engineering Ethics.” Science, Technology and  Human Values. 25.2 (Spring 2000): 195-225.
4) Davis. Michael. “Engineering Ethics, Individuals, and Organizations” Engineering Ethics 12:2 (2006) 5) Davis, Michael. “Thinking like an Engineer: The Place of a Code of Ethics in the Practice of a Profession”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20.2 (1991): 150-167
6) Moriarty, Gene. Fall 2001. “Three Kinds of Ethics for Three Kinds of Engineering” IEEE Technology and Society
Magazine pp. 31-38
7) Vesilind, P. Aarne. 1999. “The Good Engineer.” Science and Engineering Ethics 5(4), pp. 437-442.
8) Van den Hoven, Jeroen, Lokhorst, Gert-Jan, and Van de Poel, Ibo. 2012. “Engineering and the Problem of Moral
Overload.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18(1), pp. 143-155.
7- Content: Each paper must begin with a strong introduction, including a clear thesis statement that presents your argument and a corresponding outline of your paper to guide the reader. As you write the response paper, briefly summarize only the ideas which you think are most relevant to the topic, present your argument and the logical/evidentiary points in its favor, identify other authors’ implicit assumptions or perspectives (if using them), and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your argument in comparison with others. The purpose of your paper is to take a definitive position, which you then support with substantive argumentation and sound reasons. End your paper with a strong conclusion, summarizing your work and the position you have taken.
8- Grading schedule: the grading criteria is attached, so please follow the grading criteria carefully. I need to get an excellent grade in this paper because it is 15% of the whole course and I didn’t get a very good grade in the last response so I need to make up my loss. Please, help me in this paper and thank you very much.

• What are the key characteristics of strategic planning and management? How would you illustrate the process?

• o What are the main steps of the process that should be included?

o What sub steps do you think should be added?

o Are there variations that need to be reflected, or is the process fairly standard?

o What additional factors—within organizations or surrounding them—shape this process? How should these be included in a graphic?
• What unique aspects of the health care field might influence strategic planning? Consider the various insights you have gained throughout this Master of Healthcare Administration program.
• Do approaches to strategic planning and management vary among health care providers? If so, how? What circumstances might influence how a particular organization approaches this process? Consider issues identified in previous courses as well as developments in current events.

• Select a particular type of health care organization to focus on for this assignment. You may bring to mind a health care organization you examined for the Discussion, or a different one. (You will not need to convey how strategic planning is actually carried out in a specific organization, but you should have some organizational specifics in mind as you think through this assignment.)
• As you begin to draft your graphic, consider:

• o How could you use lines or other graphic representations to show connections between various elements?

o How could you use color to convey meaning?

o What labels or text is needed to ensure the graphic elements make sense?
• Word and PowerPoint provide the tools you will need to create this document. For example, in MSWord you will find ideas in the “insert” functions such as picture, clip art, shapes, Smart Art, etc. In PowerPoint, you will find functions in Shapes and Layout. You can also create elements in MSWord to cut and Paste into PowerPoint. Select symbols, flow designs and connectors to create your visual representation. If you would prefer to use a different type of software program other than Microsoft to create your visual document, contact your instructor as soon as possible to see if it is acceptable.

Provide a definition of the word father according to the Oxford English dictionary and then to go on to explain what its significance on the play as a whole.

Goals, carrier objectives and philosophy of nursing

ASSIGNMENT I – MANAGEMENT REPORT
1. Using appropriate academic models and concepts identify and discuss the main internal and external factors that have affected the chosen organisation and influenced the strategies it has employed to date. (30%)

2. Looking forwards, and again using suitable strategy models where appropriate, critically assess whether the organisation’s current strategies offer a good fit between the its resources and capabilities and the evolving external environment, identifying whether there are any areas of opportunity or risk that need to be addressed by senior management? (40%)
3. As a result of your previous analysis, identify at least two strategic options for the organization, and make recommendations to the senior management about which strategy to follow, supported by your reasons and commenting on how you would implement your proposals. (30%)

Waiting time and consultation time of old and new patient in OPD, Pusrawi Hospital and the contributing factors and effect on patient’s satisfaction

Today the US Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision announced that the Arizona Congressional lines drawn by the Independent Redistricting Commission would stand. In doing so they defined the “Legislature” as meaning legislative authority granted to the people, not solely the elected body. Do you agree with this statement? Explain the Initiative and Referendum process in Arizona. List at least one law that was passed through the initiative process. Were there any unintended consequences from the law? What where they?

http://tucson.com/news/state-and-regional/supreme-court-upholds-arizona-s-congressional-lines/article_c63aac70-1e64-11e5-be45-27960cdd67eb.html

This assignment requires each to undertake a critical literature review of the topic that has been allocated to them , see indicative areas below , and identify , synthesise and critique the key issues and themes emerging(max 3000 word):
indicative areas incude:

1.networks,do they explain rapid internationalization?

2.explaning born global internationalization

3.domestic new ventures international new ventures

4.external and internal barriers to born global internalization.