Must utilize 3-4 sources, use two library databases, and one source must be primary.
Must include in-text citations that identifies the source for the evidence
Project description
i want scientific critique for each of the following studies in addition mention the strengthen and weakening of each study.
make sure that 500 words for each study
best regard
———-
Added on 31.10.2016 13:24
i want scientific critique for each of the following studies in addition mention the strengthen and weakening of each study.
make sure that 500 words for each study
make sure to use the studies that i send for you
best regard
Instruction files
indianjophthalmol618410-3691875_101518.pdf(1,90 MiB)
5.5.95._carracedo_13_e_l_clearkone_for_kconus-1month_.pdf(200,80 KiB)
opth-5-331.pdf(657,60 KiB)
scleral_lenses_in_the_management_of_keratoconus.pdf(516,11 KiB)
visual_acuity_and_ocular_aberrations_with_different_rigid_gas_permeable_lens_fittings_in_keratoconus(File not exist or corrupt.)
visual_acuity_and_ocular_aberrations_with_different_rigid_gas_permeable_lens_fittings_in_keratoconus(File not exist or corrupt.)
Required Must watch movie Fog of War (300-500 words) (75 points) After watching Fog of War, completing the readings, and thinking about Week XI (Japanese internment) and Week VIII (Benedict), how should we think about the United Statess use of the atomic bomb in WWII? Was it justifiable? Should we factor in considerations for race or nationalism? What arguments do this weeks authors use? What is the atomic bombs legacy?
Required: You must reference the movie plus two readings from the attachments.
Synthesis Paper: Doctoral Identity
In Topic 2, you were asked to read three articles on the topic of doctoral identity and to complete an annotated bibliography to demonstrate their understanding of the material. In Topic 3, you were asked to take this process a step further and identify themes found in the three articles and to complete a synthesis worksheet where the themes were supported by evidence from each article. In this assignment, you will build on your worksheet efforts and write a paper about the three themes. The narrative will not only present the evidence from the articles to support the identified themes, but also will provide an analysis for each theme by synthesizing the information collected.
General Requirements:
Locate the Synthesis Worksheet you completed in Topic 3.
Locate and download Synthesis Paper Template from the Course Materials for this topic.
Review the articles by Baker & Pifer (2011), Gardner (2009), and Smith & Hatmaker (2014) located in the Course Materials for this topic.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. Review the GCU APA Style Guide for Writing located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Using the Synthesis Worksheet you completed in Topic 3 and considering the themes you developed and the feedback provided by your instructor, write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that synthesizes the three articles. Your paper should include the following:
1. An introduction that introduces and provides context for the topic. This includes giving a brief desrption of each article and its purpose, identifying the three themes that emerged from your reading, describing how they will be discussed in the paper, and presenting a clear thesis statement.
2. Support for your identified themes with evidence from each article. Provide analysis of these findings to strengthen your narrative.
A discussion of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity. What is the overall message of the group of articles?
Topic 3:
1. Demystifying Academic Writing: Reflections on Emotions, Know-How and Academic Identity
Read:
Cameron, J., Nairn, K., & Higgins, J. (2009). Demystifying academic writing: Reflections on emotions, know-how and academic identity. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 269-284.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?urlhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?directtrue&dba9h&AN40830687&siteehost-live&scopesite
2. The Role of Relationships in the Transition from Doctor to Independent Scholar
Review:
Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2011). The role of relationships in the transition from doctor to independent scholar. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 5-17. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515569
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?urlhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?directtrue&dba9h&AN57948982&siteeds-live&scopesite
3. Conceptualizing Success in Doctoral Education: Perspectives of Faculty in Seven Disciplines
Review:
Gardner, S. K. (2009).
Conceptualizing auccess in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383-406. doi: 10.1353/rhe.0.0075
http://search.proquest.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/220855890/BF07F7F6D7ED4938PQ/4?accountid7374
4. Knowing, Doing, and Becoming: Professional Identity Construction among Public Affairs Doctoral Students
Read:
Smith, A. E., & Hatmaker, D. M. (2014). Knowing, doing, and becoming: Professional identity construction among public affairs doctoral students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(4), 545-564.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?urlhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?directtrue&dbedsjsr&ANedsjsr.24369837&siteeds-live&scopesite
Topic 2:
1. The Role of Relationships in the Transition from Doctor to Independent Scholar
Read:
Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2011). The role of relationships in the transition from doctor to independent scholar. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 5-17. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515569
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?urlhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?directtrue&dbehh&AN57948982&siteehost-live&scopesite
2. Conceptualizing Success in Doctoral Education: Perspectives of Faculty in Seven Disciplines
Read:
Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing auccess in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383-406. doi: 10.1353/rhe.0.0075
http://search.proquest.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/220855890/BF07F7F6D7ED4938PQ/4?accountid7374
3. Knowing, Doing, and Becoming: Professional Identity Construction among Public Affairs Doctoral Students
Read:
Smith, A. E., & Hatmaker, D. M. (2014). Knowing, doing, and becoming: Professional identity construction among public affairs doctoral students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(4), 545-564.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?urlhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?directtrue&dbehh&AN98850723&siteehost-live&scopesite
Week 5 Assignment: Create a document in Word that is formatted as an annotated bibliography. On the document, list four (4), varied sources you will use in your final career interest project. Be sure to provide the essential information for each source including author name(s), title of the source, and other details. Under the citation of each source, write an original paragraph of 3-5 sentences telling what is contained in the source (summarize when appropriate) and why the source could be relevant to your project.
Information about creating an annotated bibliography and what one looks like: http://library.sjsu.edu/video/annotated-bibliographies
Remember: Select ONE citation method you want to use based on your academic degree program. Return to Lesson 4 if you need to see the list of disciplines and their corresponding citation styles. The majority of students will probably use APA, but MLA, but Chicago/Turabian may also be used.
Upload your annotated bibliography by Sunday of Week 5. The annotated bibliography can easily be built from the source search worksheet used in week 3 of this course and additional sources you have selected.
In this weeks lesson, you explored two (2) different types of cloud-based information storage–Google Drive and Dropbox.
Now search for and review two (2) more cloud-based storage options, preferably different than your classmates posts. Consider the privacy and security issues that could go along with publicly posting ones own work. Of the four (4) storage options you now know about, which cloud-based storage would you choose? Why? What are some of the solutions strengths and weaknesses?
Consider reading user reviews as part of your research this week. Be thinking about how the reviewers present their thoughts–do user reviews impact your own analysis of the storage solution? Why or why not? To round out your objective analysis, mention what you discovered from user reviews?
Share the links of the two new storage solutions you researched.
Make an initial post by 11:55pm ET Thursday of Week 3. Reply to at least 2 classmates and manage your own thread.
Review the following scenario:
Your process team has been requested to identify technology that would be beneficial to manufacturing and service operations clients (e.g., SBS Seating and MLD Hospital). Consider the following:
SBS Seating manufactures leather seating that consists of various components, such as frames; electrical parts (heating and comfort features); padding; and leather sewing (final assembly). It currently uses basic accounting software and high-end manufacturing plant machinery in its operations.
MLD Hospital has little or no specific technology tools pertaining to inventory management.
Waltons Department Store: a growing retail concern that is interested in providing low cost products and is relying on technological innovation to optimize costs.
Your task is to research and identify appropriate tools for the clients listed above, developing a review of potential technologies (software and hardware) that may be appropriate for each industry area and client in particular. Your deliverable should include the following:
The 3 clients represent 3 different industries: manufacturing, healthcare, and retail. Explain how the technology requirements for SCM are the same and how they are different.
Research and identify a minimum of 2 appropriate software tools for each industry and client, explaining how each will support the business and which aspects of the business.
Research and identify one other nonsoftware technology that might be useful (e.g., robotics for manufacturing) to each industry, and explain how the technology will help optimize costs and efficiencies.