Author: chris

Describe to the audience the significance of this research evidence and explain how an analysis of it leads to the proof of your thesis.

Using the template in lesson one, prepare an outline in complete sentence form for each speech. This does not mean writing your entire speech, only the topic sentence for the three to five supporting points that prove your thesis. Include a thesis statement that contains the claim or prediction you will prove or illustrate (which is usually spoken); a purpose statement, indicating the response from the audience you wish to achieve (which is not usually spoken); an introduction; a body, including supporting evidence; transitions; and a conclusion. When you use outside sources in creating your speech, (required in speeches two, three, and four) include them in the speech with a short spoken citation and provide a bibliography on the outline.

Speech 3 (due in week six)

This speech requires the use of research and outside sources in creating your speech; include them in a bibliography as well as citing them in the outline and subsequent speech.

Speech 3 is a 4 to 6 minute (closer to 6 minutes than to 4) speech in which you seek to persuade the audience to take some action or change some behavior or way of thinking. This argument is based on research, not on opinion, values, or beliefs. The essence of this speech is meant to cause the audience to respond in some way.

While you may attempt to elicit an emotional response from the audience, the bulk of your argument must be based on current factual research. Describe to the audience the significance of this research evidence and explain how an analysis of it leads to the proof of your thesis.
An example might be a speech arguing that the United States should (or should not) eliminate pennies from its monetary system or replace dollar bills with dollar coins.

use this template for the outline https://edge.apus.edu/access/content/attachment/280755/Assignments/30f21bb7-dc53-4579-864d-6653f2099efc/Outline%20Template.docx

Comments from Support Team: Category  “public speaking”

IDENTIFY and DEFINE a concept/idea from the chapter that connected or contrasted with what you experienced on your walk

Take a 15-minute (or longer) walk on or off campus.

You must be walking alone. No combining your walk with someone else from the class. If someone approaches you, please tell them you are doing a class activity and will talk to them later.
No technology during your walk – shut off your phone, don’t check it, no music, etc.
Try to walk somewhere you’ve never been before or don’t go often.
Write your Application Reflection
IDENTIFY and DEFINE a concept/idea from the chapter that connected or contrasted with what you experienced on your walk.
Parenthetically cite the concept/idea you’re addressing. In other words, at the end of your description, put the page number of where that concept/idea is referenced in the text within parenthesis (172).
APPLY that concept to what you experienced on your walk. Describe what you experienced specifically.
EXTEND (optional) your concept/example to other concepts we’ve studied to date, appropriate outside source material, etc.
Please provide a link to that material within your application reflection.
Connected to additional interpersonal concepts other than those assigned for this app reflect.
Connected to credible outside source material, extra topic resources (from JSB on Moodle), etc.
Provided parenthetical citation for text material and links/bib citation for outside material.

Discuss Industrial Relations.

please follow the Instructions on upload files, and do not use high level words. If you need anything from the book feel very to email me back. I will upload topic from the book, and please use the book as reference. please keep your writing style as the order before ID: 67469604,and 70043225 because the instructor will recognize the different.
I am ganna upload the old assignment to avoid some mistake on this order.
Course text: Groschl, S., Dowl ing, P.J., Festing, M., & Engle Sr, A. D. (2009).

Analyze how Antigone, Medea, and Lysistrata are or are not feminist works.

Directions: Responses must be typed in 12 point font, double-spaced with 1 inch margins.
MLA is required for outside sources, not the texts (readings). Answers should be a mixture
of summary and analysis.
1. Analyze how The Epic of Gilgamesh or The Odyssey is an epic. 10 points
2. Discuss hospitality in The Odyssey or Medea. 10 points
3. Explain the interaction of gods/goddesses and humans in 2 of the following works: The Epic
of Gilgamesh, The Odyssey, and Metamorphoses. 15 points.
4. Discuss how biblical story of Joseph differs from The Koran’s? What is the significance of
the differences? 15 points.
5. Describe how 5 out of 11 Aristotle’s tragedy themes appear in Antigone and Medea (you can
pick the same 5 tragic themes to describe both if you choose). 25 points
Pick one of the following:
6. Analyze how Antigone, Medea, and Lysistrata are or are not feminist works. 25 points
7. Discuss how predestination appears or doesn’t appear in the Gilgamesh, The Odyssey and
Metamorphoses. 25 points
Extra Credit up to 10 points:
8. Out of all the characters from the works so far, who do you think is the most compelling or
fascinating character and why?

I would like to include the extra credit as well.
Comments from Support Team: 10 point questions should be about a paragraph, 15 point once a paragraph or 2, and 25 questions should be about a page . The paper should be double spaced.

Why did you choose the Arrangement that you did, and what was it?

Approximately 2-3 pages in length. The structure of your reflection is up to you (answering all in one essay form, answering # questions, etc.), but it should explain in your own words the process of creating your project and use your RAIDS analysis guide from the start of the semester to answer these questions:

1) How did you Invent material for this project? (How/where did you and your partner get your material?)

2) Why did you choose the Arrangement that you did, and what was it? (What way did you organize your project, and why did you organize your project this way?)

3) What Style choices did you make in writing? Why?

4) How did you use the Delivery method (an essay) to make your points?

5) What Revision advice did you get in peer review/etc., and how did you apply this advice to your final draft? What ideas and information did you Revise as you wrote (your understanding? the audience’s expectations?)

6) Include an accounting of your individual contribution to the project and a discussion of your team’s working dynamics (how did you work together?)

7) Lastly and most important: what do you believe has been successful in your essay? What would you change, revise, or do differently if you had a ‘do-over’? What did you learn about yourself, your writing, and inquiry/analysis as you wrote this essay (What can you take forward from this writing into future work)?

What are the advantages and potential pitfalls with documenting and reviewing our progress (or lack of progress) in the health and wellness measuring process.

Write a 200-word original response to the questions, or write a 200-word response to other students’ responses. The Purpose of “Discussions” is to interact with one another and learn from the discourse. So try not to simply post an “online essay” but engage one another, play with ideas, and propose challenges and extensions to one another’s posts.

1. When we are completing the work on an incident and initiating demobilization, what might we find are critical things for incident commanders and other leaders to be mindful of and ensure get accomplished? Is a Post-Incident Analysis (PIA) an effective way of gathering information and interpreting it for increasing safety on future incidents? As one conducting a PIA, what are the potential pitfalls and how might you avoid the group falling into them?

2. How is charting the success of health and wellness analogous to conducting PIAs? What are the advantages and potential pitfalls with documenting and reviewing our progress (or lack of progress) in the health and wellness measuring process? Who is the judge of whether or not successes and failures are “acceptable” or not?
Comments from Support Team: Category  “Health and Safety Program Management”

Describing interest in the STEM or other health professions, research, and the summer research program.

Please include your academic goals, some areas of research in STEM that currently interest you, and your future career plans. Describing interest in the STEM or other health professions, research, and the summer research program. Include your prior research experiences, academic plans, as well as short and long term professional goals. Lastly, how can University at buffalo CSTEP Summer research program contribute to your goals and professional aspirations, and what do you hope to gain and accomplish, if selected? Discusses your current educational objectives, career plans, and personal goals

Describe “Numbers Can be Worth a Thousand Pictures:

Read the “Numbers Can be Worth a Thousand Pictures: Individual Differences in Understanding Graphical and Numerical Representations of Health-Related Information” article prior to answering. Informed decision making in the mental health and medical professions requires the ability to understand and effectively communicate statistical information. address the following:
Select one mental health disorder of your choice based on a valid diagnostic category in the DSM-5.
Research the disorder and locate relevant statistics obtained within the past 7 years regarding overall prevalence, gender and age differences, and treatment options.
Present this information in the discussion forum in two formats: Format 1 for individuals with high graph literacy; Format 2: for individuals with low graphic literacy but high numerical literacy. Information regarding each of these two formats is discussed in the assigned article.

What justifications do the Alien and Sedition Acts contain for these measures aimed primarily at the press.

For next Thursday, I want you to read the attached documents and compose a short written response. These documents consist of excerpts from the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts, as well the Virginia Resolution, which contains the response by Jefferson and Madison to these policies. After reading these documents, I want you to respond to the following questions in a short written response (a page or so).

1. What justifications do the Alien and Sedition Acts contain for these measures aimed primarily at the press?

2. On what basis does the Virginia Resolution argue that these Acts are unjust?

3. Finally, while our instincts tell us that such measures as the Alien and Sedition Acts cannot be justified, are there certain circumstances where you could see a need by government to limit freedom of the press in this manner?