The Journal of Forensic Science is a very well respected journal in this field.

Paper requirements:
Each student will write a Six page paper citing at least six scholarly sources one the topic given to you. This paper should be written using (APA) format (strictly enforced) with title page and reference page. Your paper should be double spaced with no more than 12 point font and one inch margins. Research for this paper should come from scholarly sources. The Journal of Forensic Science is a very well respected journal in this field. The paper should provide results of scientific experimentation on your topic and must provide much greater depth of the selected topic than covered in class.

Dear writer, I also included some sources already in APA format. I don’t know if you want to use them or not but I need no less than six scholarly peer reviewed sources.

Forensic criminal casework often involves DNA profiling of human postmortem tissues, whereas degradational processes can affect PCR-based Short Tandem Repeat (STR) analysis.

Forensic Science International
Volume 173, Issues 2–3, 20 December 2007, Pages 103–106

The Achilles tendon as a DNA source for STR typing of highly decayed corpses
⦁ A. Roeper, ,
W. Reichert,
R. ⦁ Mattern
Show more
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.004

Abstract
Forensic criminal casework often involves DNA profiling of human postmortem tissues, whereas degradational processes can affect PCR-based Short Tandem Repeat (STR) analysis. Degradation of DNA is observed to vary among different tissues and with time. Therefore, the stability of DNA in Achilles tendon samples is compared to that in muscle and kidney specimens with a variety of postmortem histories. Tissue samples from 28 autopsy cases, including 15 decomposed corpses and a control group of 13 nondecayed corpses were analysed. DNA was isolated using the All-tissue DNA Kit (GEN-IAL, Troisdorf, Germany), quantified by spectrophotometric measurement, amplified by the multiplex PCR genRES MPX-2 (Serac, Bad Homburg, Germany), and analysed on the ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany).
Quantitative analysis of nondecomposed tissues revealed that the recovery of DNA was highest in kidney followed by muscle, whereas Achilles tendon tissue was the poorest source of isolated DNA.
Only small amounts of DNA were present in both kidney and muscle samples from decomposed corpses. However, from decayed Achilles tendon samples twice as much DNA as from nondecayed samples could be isolated on average. These results suggest DNA to be better protected in Achilles tendons. Moreover, postmortem changes in Achilles tendons may even improve DNA isolation.
Keywords
⦁ Short Tandem Repeats (STRs);
⦁ Postmortem tissues;
⦁ Achilles tendon;
⦁ DNA stability

1. Introduction
Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) are an important and widely used tool in forensic casework. Hoff-Olsen et al. [1] could show, that there were no somatic mutations or other potential postmortal changes even when the substrate was heavily decomposed. The degree of postmortem changes of tissues had no effect on the stability of microsatellites and so mistypings did not occur. This is crucial to the safety and reliability of these analyses.
The stability of DNA varies among different tissues, and its degradation continuously proceeds with the time passed since death. Bär et al. [2] and Ludes et al. [3] found good postmortem DNA stability in different tissues by testing VNTRs (variable number of tandem repeats). Hoff-Olsen et al. [1] investigated brain, hair, cartilage, liver, thyroid and blood by STR-analysis but the most suitable tissue for STR analysis could not be established.
As Microsatellite analysis of bone tissue is very time-consuming and complex in this study it is investigated whether the Achilles tendon is a useful material for STR analysis when dealing with the identification of decayed corpses. The Achilles tendon is postulated to be a stable tissue, which is protected against autolysis and putrefaction.
2. Materials and methods
Human muscle, kidney and Achilles tendon specimens were collected from 28 autopsy cases performed at the Institute of Legal Medicine and Traffic Medicine in Heidelberg. The postmortem period of the corpses ranged from about 4 days to 2 years. Of the 28 reported cases 12 were decayed, two lay in the water for a longer period and one was nearly completely skeletonized. Thirteen nondecayed corpses, including three burn victims, represent the control group. The tissue samples were stored at −20 °C.
DNA from tissue samples was extracted using the All-tissue DNA Kit (GEN-IAL, Troisdorf, Germany). Fifty milligrams of each sample – muscle, kidney and Achilles tendon – were used for DNA extraction according to the manufacturer’s standard protocol. Optimal results were obtained with lysis for 1 h at 65 °C. The isolated DNA was dissolved in 50 μl ddH2O. DNA quantitation was performed by spectrophotometric measurement.
One nanogram of spectrophotometrically quantitated DNA was used as template for amplification. PCR was performed using the commercially available PCR multiplex system genRES MPX-2 (Serac, Bad Homburg, Germany). With this MPX-2 Kit Amelogenin and the eight STR-systems Hum TH01, vWA, FGA, D21S11, SE33, D3S1358, D8S1179 and D18S51 can be simultaneously amplified in one reaction. Amplification was carried out in a T3-Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 12 min, then 30 cycles comprising 93 °C 1 min, 59 °C 1 min, 72 °C 90 s followed by a final extension of 45 min at 60 °C.
Electrophoresis was performed on an ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) using a 50 μm i.d. capillary and the polymer POP4.
One microliter of the PCR product was mixed with 12 μl HiDi-formamide and 0.4 μl of the internal standard genRES LS500ROX (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). The mixture was denatured for 3 min at 95 °C, cooled on ice and then placed on the autosampler of the Genetic Analyzer. The ABI Prism 310 Collection Software was used for data acquisition, which were further analysed by the GeneScan Analysis Software 3.7 (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany).
3. Results
3.1. Quantitative analysis
The isolation of DNA from tissue samples by the GEN-IAL Kit yields DNA in high purity.Fig. 1 shows the amount of DNA isolated from different tissues of corpses without signs of decomposition. Except for four cases, where no kidney tissue was available the recovery of DNA from kidney was much higher compared to that of muscle. The lowest quantity of DNA was found in Achilles tendon tissue. The amount of isolated DNA ranged from 863 to 2240 ng/mg (average value 1375 ng/mg), from 194 to 480 ng/mg (average value 327 ng/mg), and from 18 to 193 ng/mg (average value 57 ng/mg) for kidney, muscle and Achilles tendon specimens, respectively.

Fig. 1.
DNA quantity of kidney, muscle and Achilles tendon from nondcayed corpses (samples 1–10), samples 11–13 from burn victims.
Figure options
The results obtained from tissue samples collected from decomposed corpses are summarised in Fig. 2. In two cases (21 and 28) kidney tissue was not available at autopsy and in one case (23) collection of muscle tissue was not possible. Apart from few cases the recovery of isolated DNA was poor in both kidney and muscle tissue specimens, whereas higher amounts of DNA could be obtained from Achilles tendon specimens in most cases. The range of DNA was from 4 to 1080 ng/mg (average value 217 ng/mg), from 5 to 722 ng/mg (average value 174 ng/mg), and from 6 to 345 ng/mg (average value 100 ng/mg) for kidney, muscle and Achilles tendon, respectively.

Fig. 2.
DNA quantity of kidney, muscle and Achilles tendon from decayed corpses (samples 14–25), samples 26 and 27 from dead bodies which lay in the water for an unknown period, sample 28 is a nearly completely skeletonized corpse.
Figure options
3.2. Qualitative analysis
Table 1 shows the results of the STR-profiles obtained from nondecayed and decayed samples. In all cases where decomposition was not present, the entire profiles (Amelogenin and 8 STR-systems) could be established. The amplification quality related to the peak height generated the best results for Achilles tendon followed by kidney and muscle.
Table 1.
STR profiles of nondecayed and decayed samples
n No profile Incomplete profile Complete profile
Nondecayed samples (all tissues) 13 – – 13

Decayed samples
Muscle 14 4a 2 8
Kidney 13 – 1 12
Achilles tendon 15 3 – 12
a
In one sample Amelogenin was successfully amplified.
Table options
Only 8 out of 14 decomposed muscle samples showed a complete profile. In two cases an incomplete one and in four cases no alleles were observed. In the case of 13 decayed kidney tissue samples a complete profile was found in 12 cases whereas one case showed an incomplete profile. No incomplete profile was found in decayed Achilles tendon tissues. A complete profile was obtained from 12 out of 15 Achilles tendon samples, whereas three samples failed to produce a profile. Among the samples where no profile was obtained, two were from highly putrefied corpses and one was nearly completely skeletonized. In general the observed peak height of decayed tissue samples was much lower, except for Achilles tendon specimens where the peak height was comparable to that observed in muscle from nondecayed tissues.
The typing results of the tissues from decomposed corpses are shown in detail in Table 2.
Table 2.
STR analysis performed on tissue samples from 15 decayed corpses
Tissue n1 Amelogenin D3S1358 TH01 vWA FGA D21S11 D18S51 D8S1179 SE33 Total Possible typings

n2 %
Muscle 14 11 10 10 8 9 9 8 9 8 82 126 65.08
Kidney 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 116 117 99.15
Achilles tendon 15 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 108 135 80.00
In one case no muscle tissue was available, in two cases kidney samples were missing. n1: number of cases, n2: maximum number of possible typings of single alleles.
Full-size table
Table options
In muscle and kidney tissue samples, STR-systems with longer alleles dropped out more frequently than those with shorter fragments. Only about 65% of possible alleles could be typed in muscle tissues compared to 80% in Achilles tendon. No dropouts of single alleles were observed in tissue samples of Achilles tendon. In these samples either no alleles could be detected or a complete profile could be established.
In all cases DNA profiles from decomposed corpses were identical irrespective of the source material.
4. Discussion
Specimens of human kidney, muscle and Achilles tendon tissue with a variety of postmortem histories were used in a comparative study of DNA recovery and STR analysis.
There was no strong correlation observed between the time passed since death and the DNA content in the tissues under investigation. A high recovery of DNA could be established from nondecayed tissues whereas in kidney and muscle tissue from decomposed corpses a considerable decrease in DNA quantity was evident. In contrast to this, the DNA content of decomposed Achilles tendon tissues was nearly twice as much as in nondecayed tissues. We assume that this phenomenon is due to autolytic processes which facilitate DNA extraction.
The good quality of DNA from nondecayed samples allowed the typing of a complete STR profile in all cases. All alleles could successfully be typed independent of their length. Decomposed samples from kidney and muscle tissue showed variable DNA degradation resulting in incomplete or no profiles (Table 1). Considering each STR system in detail (Table 2) it is evident that especially in muscle tissue longer fragments drop out more often. Obviously longer fragments are earlier affected by degradation than shorter fragments. For Achilles tendon tissue specimens showing a complete profile even the longest SE33 alleles could be typed without difficulties. This indicates that Achilles tendon is a very stable tissue and less affected by degradation processes in human remains. The quality of STR typing does not strongly correlate with the postmortem period of the samples but it depends on the degree of decomposition. A total drop out of Achilles tendon analysis occurred in three corpses which were heavily decomposed.
In conclusion, Achilles tendon is a very suitable tissue for PCR-based STR analysis in human identification and forensic casework when dealing with heavily decomposed remains.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the autopsy technicians Ralf Bartsch, Achim Schmidt and Christian Weigl for collecting tissue material.
References
⦁
[1]
⦁ P. Hoff-Olsen, S. Jacobsen, B. Mevåg, B. Olaisen
⦁ Microsatellite stability in human post-mortem tissues
⦁ Forensic Sci. Int., 119 (2001), pp. 273–278
⦁ [SD-008]
⦁
[2]
⦁ W. Bär, A. Kratzer, M. Mächler, W. Schmid
⦁ Postmortem stability of DNA
⦁ Forensic Sci. Int., 39 (1988), pp. 59–70
⦁ [SD-008]
⦁
[3]
⦁ B. Ludes, H. Pfitzinger, P. Mangin
⦁ DNA fingerprinting from tissues after variable postmortem periods
⦁ J. Forensic Sci., 38 (1993), pp. 686–690
⦁ [SD-008]
Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 6221 56 89 56; fax: +49 6221 56 52 52.
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Write an essay in which your thesis is either the claim that it is a convincing argument, or the claim that it is not.

In chapter 7 of Paul Thompson’s book, From Field to Fork, he discusses an argument that claims that since GMO technology has the potential to alleviate hunger and malnutrition throughout the world, we therefore all have an obligation to support that effort, even if we have various moral qualms with GMOs.

But Thompson takes very seriously that some considerations about the “virtuousness” (or lack thereof) of the “insiders” concerning agricultural biotechnology (scientists, etc.) put the general population in a position to reject that obligation. Perhaps this line of thought could show that qualms that we may have about GMOs are in fact not overridden by GMO technology’s promise to alleviate hunger and malnutrition throughout the world.

It’s that argument about the lack of “virtuousness” of the insiders that I want you to evaluate. Do you find it a convincing argument, or not? And why or why not?

Write an essay in which your thesis is either the claim that it is a convincing argument, or the claim that it is not.

Give a clear exposition of how that argument goes, and give the most convincing argument that you can for your position.

Then consider and respond to the most significant objection that you can to the line of reasoning that you have given.

You should make specific citations (citing the page) to the readings. It’s acceptable to only use references to Thompson’s book, thought it might be useful to cite other readings.

Explain and give examples of how the particular outcomes of a study can suggest if a particular threat is likely to have been present.

Part I – Answer the following questions:

Jackson (2012), even-numbered chapter exercises, p 360.
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of quasi-experiments? What is the fundamental weakness of a quasi-experimental design? Why is it a weakness? Does its weakness always matter?
If you randomly assign participants to groups, can you assume the groups are equivalent at the beginning of the study? At the end? Why or why not? If you cannot assume equivalence at either end, what can you do? Please explain.
Explain and give examples of how the particular outcomes of a study can suggest if a particular threat is likely to have been present.
Describe each of the following types of designs, explain its logic, and why the design does or does not address the selection threats discussed in Chapter 7 of Trochim and Donnelly (2006):
Non-equivalent control group pretest only
Non-equivalent control group pretest/posttest
Cross-sectional
Regression-Discontinuity
Why are quasi-experimental designs used more often than experimental designs?
One conclusion you might reach (hint) after completing the readings for this assignment is that there are no bad designs, only bad design choices (and implementations). State a research question for which a single-group post-test only design can yield relatively unambiguous findings.

Part II – Answer the following questions:

What research question(s) does the study address?
What is Goldberg’s rationale for the study? Was the study designed to contribute to theory? Do the results of the study contribute to theory? For both questions: If so, how? If not, why not?
What constructs does the study address? How are they operationalized?
What are the independent and dependent variables in the study?
Name the type of design the researchers used.
What internal and external validity threats did the researchers address in their design? How did they address them? Are there threats they did not address? If so how does the failure to address the threats affect the researchers’ interpretations of their findings? Are Goldberg’s conclusions convincing? Why or why not?

Support your paper with a minimum of 5 resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

Length: 5-7 pages not including title and reference pages
References: Minimum of 5 scholarly resources.

Thesis and Outline -Due November 12th by 5:30pm We will workshop your thesis and outlines together in groups during part of our regularly scheduled class time throughout the session.

) Seminar Paper 50%

Students will write a final comparative paper of 6-8 pages to elaborate on a particular thesis about gender and religion as presented in at least 2 of the 3 novels and draw on at least 3 secondary readings to provide supporting evidence for their readings. The precise topic should emerge from your own interests. This paper will be written in stages as part of a process, and some of the work will be completed in class through a series of writing exercises and group collaborations.

 

Part A: (5%) Thesis and Outline -Due November 12th by 5:30pm We will workshop your thesis and outlines together in groups during part of our regularly scheduled class time throughout the session; however a thoughtful thesis and an outline must be submitted to your digication eportfolio.

 

Part B: (10%) Annotated Bibliography-Due November 19th by 5:30 pm –This is the research component of your paper, and will demonstrate that you are aware of the secondary material that is relevant to your project. Detailed instructions will be provided for you during the class and your Annotated Bibiography. Your working groups can help you find sources that might be relevant.

 

Part C: (10%) Rough Draft –Due December 3rd by 5:30pm-The rough draft will incorporate your thesis and follow the organizational structure set out by your outline, though deviations from your original ideas are to be expected, especially since you will be farther along in the course. The Rough draft must be at least 3 pages and show some effort to use secondary sources to support your arguments about the primary sources given in your thesis.

 

Part D: (25%) Final comparative pape

What are the processes and planning involved in the proposed brand change.

<br>
The plan chosen is Alpro <br>
The BRANDING Plan (±800 words)<br>
What are the processes and planning involved in the proposed brand change? A shortlist of consultancies that you have chosen to work with, clearly showing your selection criteria and final choices.<br>
The branding brief<br>
Timeline with design phases and brand rollout with chosen agency (what activities – whichmedia channels and where and when)<br>
Your approach to budget, scope, management and measurement of your proposed brander invention<br>
The Plan should include citations to any literature throughout (Harvard style) with a complete list of References and Bibliography at the end. Visual and competitor material that supports the changes to the brand should be included within the body of the report and/or the Appendix.

Identify the materials indices you will use to rank / select your materials.

<br>
Materials and process selection for a bicycle frame<br>
Background<br>
The principle components of the bike are familiar and their function needs no explanation. The largest of these is the frame. Frames can be made from a remarkable diversity of materials: CFRP, carbon steel, GFRP, nylon, wood, aluminium, titanium etc… How is it that such a diversity of materials can co-exist in a free market in which competition favours the fittest – sure there must be a single “best” material for the job?<br>
The mistake here is to assume that all bikes have the same purpose. The specification of a “shopping” or “uni” bike is very different from that of one for speed or for the mountain, as are the objectives of the purchaser.<br>
The Project<br>
Explore materials and process selection for bike frames (illustrated below) or for any other component of the bike: forks, handle bars, cranks, wheels, brake or gear cables….<br>
1) Analyse your chosen component, listing its function, the constraints it must meet and the objectives for the bike – This will require a decision about the type of bike you are designing (shopping (booze cruiser), speed / road / track bike, mountain bike, folding, children’s etc). Remember to include a lower cut-off constraint on fracture toughness (K1C &gt; 15MPa √m is a good approximation to start at) – a brittle bike would be a bad idea!<br>
2) List the requirements as Functions, Constraints, Objectives and Free V ariables.<br>
3) Identify the materials indices you will use to rank / select your materials.<br>
4) Identify a promising material for the component.<br>
5) Make a choice of material and then use CES EduPack Joining database to<br>
select ways of joining the frame.<br>
6) Present the case study for your choice of material and process as a report. Use<br>
the charts from CES EduPack and other sources to explain your reasoning.<br>
For the purposes of simplicity it is suggested that you avoid accounting for shape in your selection criteria / indices identification. However, you should still consider the form of your component when considering an appropriate manufacturing process.<br>
To make the right choices you will need to source some information on typical service conditions for you selected bike type, these might be mechanical, physical or environmental focussed properties. You will also need to consider the type of conditions experienced by the component <a href=”https://e.g” target=”_blank”>e.g</a>. bending, tension, torsion, abrasion etc.<br>
<br>
<br>
Assignments will be assessed on the basis of the quality and clarity of the problem construction, the selection of indices, appropriate use of charts / figures and crucially the analysis and interpretation of the results presented.

Discuss at least one of your sources must be a peer-reviewed academic source.

THESE ARE THE INSTRUCTIONS VIA THE PROFESSOR/ ALSO REMEMBER ONLY 3 ONLINE SOURCES/ ONE SOURCE MUST.. MUST BE A PEER REVIEWED ARTICLE IN TOTAL THERE WILL BE 10 SOURCES. 3 CAN BE INTERNET 1 HAS TO BE PEER REVIEWED You will write a 10 page paper (not including end notes/bibliography) describing the place and influence of your chosen band within the history of rock and on stylistic changes in rock history. You must include musical description and important features of four songs by the band. Your paper will critique the role of these influential songs on the development of style within the particular decade they are found and in the overall history of rock. Your conclusion will include an analysis of how forward-looking ideas originate in the artistic community and how their influence is transmitted to future artists.

If you write about a song or performer/band that was discussed in class during the semester, you must still cite all information and you must include more information above and beyond what was talked about in class.

Do not use seconds and minutes to explain what happens in the song (ie: “at 1:47 the keyboard is replaced by the electric guitar, then it solos for exactly 32 seconds”). Remember to write in detail about each song and provide a persuasive argument for each song as to why it is important in rock history. This paper is not a re-telling of the material you learned in class this semester. You must provide notes and a bibliography at the end of the paper. Any bibliographic style may be used, but the style must be consistent.

Papers that do not contain a bibliography will not earn points for this assignment.

A few things to keep in mind:

•Do not use a title/cover page or include photos or drawings, etc.

•Song titles are capitalized and placed in quotes: “I’m Only Sleeping”

•Album titles are underlined: Pet Sounds

•Band names are not placed in quotes or italics: The Temptations

•Decades do not possess anything. Correct: 1950s or ‘50s

Incorrect: 1950’s or 50’s

•Dates should look like this: October 4, 1970 – not – October fourth, nineteen- •Genres are not capitalized seventy

•Instruments are not capitalized

•Do not place extra space between paragraphs

•Lyrics do not need to be cited

•If you include lyrics to a song or a quote that totals FIVE LINES OR MORE, please follow these instructions for block quotes: indent five extra spaces after the tab, no “quotation marks” and single space. For example:

I’m a flea-bit peanut monkey
All my friends are junkies
That’s not really true
I’m a cold Italian pizza
I could use a lemon squeezer
What you do?
•If lyrics are four lines or less, include them in the body of the paragraph with quotation marks. For example: “But I’ve been bit and I’ve been tossed around by every she-rat in this town. Have you, babe?”

Sources

You must include a bibliography of where you found all information for this paper. The bibliography must be at least ten academic sources:

•only three of these may be online sources.

-You may not use: Wikipedia, Song Facts, All Songs, All Music, Lyrics Freak, Metro Lyrics, AZ Lyrics, Last FM, Shmoop, Song Meanings, Music-Critic.com, etc. -these are NOT valid online academic sources.

-Any website that is based off of user opinion and not on fact may not be used.

•at least one of your sources must be a peer-reviewed academic source. This means an academic journal. This source MUST be part of this assignment. You must use the peer-reviewed source to pass this assignment.

•You may not use the class textbook (or ANY textbook), class notes, your professor, your parents, any family friend, etc. as a source.

Citation

•Very important: You must properly cite all information found from your sources. •You need to cite the source after every sentence that includes information found from that source.

•Do not wait until the end of a paragraph to cite a source.

•Patch writing is plagiarism. Patch writing is a failed attempt at paraphrasing. Rather than copying a statement word for word, the writer will rearrange phrases and change tenses, relying too heavily on the vocabulary and syntax of the source material. It’s a form of intellectual dishonesty that indicates that the writer is not actually doing their own thinking.

On presentation to the ED his clinical assessment reveals.

<br>
All info accessed through Australian College of Nursing. Principles of Acute Care Nursing<br>
<br>
UPDATED:<br>
<br>
<br>
Case Studies Case study: Bill Bill, a 40‐year‐old, has had asthma since childhood. He has experienced many hospitalisations and required long‐term oral steroids. He presents to the emergency department (ED) with acute exacerbation of his asthma that he believes has been triggered by a known allergen. At home he increased his salbutamol with little effect. He is now anxious and agitated. On presentation to the ED his clinical assessment reveals: Noted use of accessory muscles RR 36 breaths/minute HR 150 beats/minute BP 142/88 mmHg Temperature <a href=”https://36.2oC” target=”_blank”>36.2oC</a> SpO2 88% Height 170 cm Weight 80 kg Management in the ED includes: Oxygen via a non‐rebreather mask at 15 L/min Salbutamol, ipratropium bromide via nebuliser First ABG Suggested normal values pH <a href=”https://7.25″ target=”_blank”>7.25</a> <a href=”https://7.35″ target=”_blank”>7.35</a>‐<a href=”https://7.45″ target=”_blank”>7.45</a> PaO2 60mmHg 80‐100mmHg PaCO2 55mmHg 35‐45mmHg ‐ HCO3 22mmol/L 22‐26mmol/L Base excess ‐2 ‐2 to +2 No improvement so further management of: IV hydrocortisone Adrenaline via a nebuliser Salbutamol as an intravenous infusion IV normal saline at 100 mL/hour Arterial blood gas analysis