Author: chris

<br>
Hi there,<br>
<br>
I want you please to answer this assignment. <br>
the subject in )Information Systems Security)<br>
The assignment has 2 questions , and I would like you to answer both of them.<br>
this is the assignment: <br>
<br>
Question 1: <br>
What is a policy? How is it different from a law?<br>
<br>
Question 2: <br>
If an organization has three information assets to evaluate for risk management, as shown in the accompanying data, which vulnerability should be evaluated for additional controls first? Which one should be evaluated last?<br>
Data for Exercise 1:<br>
Switch L47 connects a network to the Internet. It has two vulnerabilities: it is susceptible to hardware failure at a likelihood of <a href=”https://0.2″ target=”_blank”>0.2</a>, and it is subject to an SNMP buffer overflow attack at a likelihood of <a href=”https://0.1″ target=”_blank”>0.1</a>. This switch has an impact rating of 90 and has no current controls in place. You are 75 percent certain of the assumptions and data.<br>
Server WebSrv6 hosts a company Web site and performs e-commerce transactions. It has a Web server version that can be attacked by sending it invalid Unicode values. The likelihood of that attack is estimated at <a href=”https://0.1″ target=”_blank”>0.1</a>. The server has been assigned an impact value of 100, and a control has been implanted that reduces the impact of the vulnerability by 75 percent. You are 80 percent certain of the assumptions and data.<br>
Operators use an MGMT45 control console to monitor operations in the server room. It has no passwords and is susceptible to unlogged misuse by the operators. Estimates show the likelihood of misuse is <a href=”https://0.1″ target=”_blank”>0.1</a>. There are no controls in place on this asset; it has an impact rating of 5. You are 90 percent certain of the assumptions and data.<br>
<br>
<br>
Please follow the instructions.<br>
Thanks

Choose a country other than your own. Identify and describe some of the major elements that were reported in this week’s web Hofstede reading. How do you think such elements would compare within your own country? Provide specific examples of how leadership practices in your country differ from that of your chosen country.

Optional Resources
• Course Text: Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2008) Research methods in the social sciences (7th ed.). New York: Worth.
Chapter 6, “Research Designs: Cross-Sectional and Quasi-Experimental Designs”

Course Text: Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

This textbook describes a variety of research designs, including pre-experimental designs, true experimental designs, quasi-experimental designs, and correlational and ex post facto designs. Although reading the entire textbook in one week may seem daunting, this book is a reprint of one chapter of a larger text and is quite manageable. You will use this information from this text for the Discussion and Applicatio

Paper Details:
Due date 12/4/15

Writing an Introduction for the Final Project
In this Application, you will complete the first step of your quantitative research proposal, which is your Final Project for this course. You will begin your research proposal by writing a thorough introduction.
To prepare for this Application:
• Review the Campbell and Stanley text, Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research.
• Review the Final Project Description handout provided in this week’s Learning Resources.
• Consider the focus of the quantitative research you would like to propose for this course, your personal interests, and the designs presented in Campbell and Stanley.
The assignment:
• Craft 3-paragraph introduction for your final project that includes the following components:
• The background of the problem
• A brief problem statement
• The purpose of the study
Note: Other elements listed in the handout, such as the Literature Review, Operational Definitions, and Assumptions, will be developed in later Applications and as such are not required elements in this Application.

I need to write reflective report about my learning on the research methods module. It should cover the following 5 points.
1. Discuss and reflect on the key skills that you have learned during the course.
• Do not list the topics you were taught, but discuss your own experience
2. Explain how you applied your knowledge and skills in Assessment A.
• Be critical and identify problems
3. Reflect on your success
• Assess what worked well

• Assess what did not work well
4. Identify your weaknesses
5. Propose how you will develop your skills and overcome your weaknesses

For Assessment A, that I did, I can send to you description after.

Research question:
Political institutions are key factors which distinguish varieties of political regimes (democracies and non-democracies) as well as subvarieties of democratic and nondemocratic regimes. These regime varieties (and their transformations) are both affected by and have consequences for other political, socio-economic, international and cultural phenomena. Discuss a variety of key relationships between political institutions and these other social phenomena, both with respect to institutions as the dependent variable as well as with respect to institutions as the independent variable. In addition to course literature which emphasizes theory, a wide variety of course readings which present single- as well as comparative-country case studies must be utilized. The latter can provide real-world illustrations as well as serve as sources of historical and numerical data.

Information:
Please confer all of the uploaded documents before you start writing. It is extremely important that every theory is well documented and cited! It is absolutely crucial for the assignment that the text is based overwhelmingly upon the syllabus from this course and not upon readings or knowledge that you have garnered previously, however directly or indirectly relevant that information might be. So, please use references listed in the uploaded course curriculum. And, by all means, avoid citing works that haven’t been consulted! If you make something up along the way, please do not cite an author as if you have read it somewhere else. You can use as many references as you’d like. The word-limit is 6000 words, so I’m happy with anything over 5000 words.

RHETORICAL CRITIQUE – 100 POINTS
In this assignment you will take on the role of rhetorical critic. The purpose of this critique is for you to demonstrate mastery of one of the methods of criticism we have discussed. You will choose a rhetorical artifact and fully apply one of the methods to it. You are going to create an argument that uses a particular method to interpret an artifact in support of a critical claim.
MINIMUM CRITERIA – FAILURE TO MEET THESE MAY RESULT IN AN AUTOMATIC “D” (60/100)
1. When discussing the method you must primarily reference the relevant assigned course texts. In other words, you may not rely on course texts from other classes.
2. You may NOT use or cite my lecture slides except for material on a method that is not covered by the course readings.
3. Your artifact must be appropriate for your assigned method. For example, a “hard news” story would be inappropriate for a neo-Aristotelian critique. If in doubt, ask.
AUDIENCE ASSUMPTIONS
You should write for an audience that is generally knowledgeable about communication criticism, but not conversant in your given method.
RESEARCH REQUIREMENTS
You are not required to conduct additional research on your method. However, in order to adequately do your analysis you will likely need to do outside research.
Any claims you make should be backed up by research using sources that are both reliable and appropriate for the claim being made. This standard may fluctuate depending on your method and claim. For example, if you are doing accurate interpretation you would not want to use a highly partisan political site to verify claims made by a politician in a speech. However, stories from this same site can be suitable as evidence in a narrative analysis. If in doubt, please ask.
PAPER STRUCTURE
CRITICAL CLAIM
At the top of your paper provide your critical claim. Make this a precise statement about what you will prove in your paper. This should be no more than two sentences.
INTRODUCTION (APPROX. 200-300 WORDS)
This section opens the essay and orients the reader to the rest of the argument.
1. Begin with an opening “hook” that draws in the reader
2. Provide a brief statement telling the reader what your artifact is and what method you will use
3. Articulate a clear and precise critical claim (thesis statement) that orients your argument (restated from previous section, may copy and paste)
4. Provide a brief description of the order of the paper (signposting).
ARTIFACT INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXTUALIZATION (300-600 WORDS)
In this section you will introduce your artifact.
1. Give a description of the artifact.
2. Contextualize the artifact within its social, cultural, and/or economic milieu. For example, box office and/or critical reception for films or the historical circumstances surrounding a speech. You will need outside sources here that verify any claims you make about the artifact.
METHOD EXPLICATION (900-1200 WORDS)
This section describes the method you will use to analyze your artifact. Your goal here is to demonstrate to me that you comprehend the key elements of the methods and can accurately identify, define and explain various concepts associated with the method.
1. Introduce the method by explaining its purpose.
For example: Neo-Aristotelian criticism is concerned with…
1. Identify and explain at least two presuppositions of the method that relate to your critique.
For example: Neo-Aristotelian critics assume…
2. Identify, define, and explicate those concepts from this method you will use in your critique.
For example: In this critique I will examine (name of artifact) by focusing on (concepts). Then explain the concepts.
NOTE: I expect that this section discusses the concepts that you will use in your analysis.
INTERPRETATION (1200-1500 WORDS)
In this section you will conduct your analysis of the artifact. Your goals here are is to correctly deploy the concepts you describe in your methods section to:
1. “Fix the meaning” of the artifact in a way that can deepen the audience’s understanding and appreciation of that artifact.
2. Clearly support and illuminate your critical claim.
3. Provide internal and/or external evidence that supports any claims you make. You may need to use outside research that supports your claims.
You should not forget that you are using a specific method of criticism – therefore you MUST use the vocabulary and concepts of that method, and use them correctly. However, this is more than “jargon dropping” – you need to explain and illustrate to your audience how these concepts work in your critique.
CONCLUSION (300-600 WORDS)
In this section you need comment on and explain the argument you made in the analysis. This is not simply a summary of what you wrote in the previous pages. You need to:
1. Tie your proofs from the previous section together into a coherent defense of your critical claim (thesis).
2. Explain the significance of your findings. This is your “so what” moment. It is also the place for you to most clearly state your insights into the artifact you just critiqued.
FORMATTING
 Cover page with:
 Name
 Course number
 My name
 Date
 APA citation style – I MEAN IT!
 Typed, double spaced
 1 Inch Margins
RUBRIC
EXCELLENT (100-90 POINTS) – DEMONSTRATES SUPERIOR FAMILIARITY WITH THE MATERIAL
 Well-defined, precise critical claim.
 Identifies, defines, and explains key concepts in detail and accurately. Uses relevant examples.
 Analysis consistently deploys and synthesizes key concepts/course material correctly.
 Points are clearly articulated and supported with relevant evidence/examples.
GOOD (89-80 POINTS) – DEMONSTRATES GOOD FAMILIARITY WITH THE MATERIAL
 Critical claim is broad or imprecise.
 Identifies and defines key concepts, but may offer little explanation/example. Makes minor errors.
 Analysis incorporates key concepts/course material into the overall argument but offers little explanation or synthesis. May make minor mistakes.
 Points are not always developed and/or supported.
FAIR (79-70 POINTS) – DEMONSTRATES PASSING FAMILIARITY WITH MATERIAL
 Vague critical claim that must be deciphered by the reader.
 Identifies key concepts, but offers few definitions/explanations/examples. Minor to moderate errors.
 Analysis inconsistently incorporates key concepts key concepts/course material into the argument, does not explain the relevance of the concepts used, and/or makes moderate mistakes when using concepts.
 Points are hard to follow and/or often unsupported with relevant evidence.
MARGINAL (69-60 POINTS) – DEMONSTRATES LITTLE FAMILIARITY WITH MATERIAL
 Weak critical claim that cannot structure the paper.
 Inconsistently identifies keys concepts. Offers virtually no definitions/explanations/examples and/or makes serious mistakes.
 Consistently fails to incorporate key concepts into the analysis and/or makes serious mistakes when using concepts.
 Points are poorly articulated and/or consistently unsupported with relevant evidence/examples.
POOR (59 POINTS AND BELOW) – DEMONSTRATES NO CLEAR FAMILIARITY WITH THE MATERIAL
 No discernible critical claim.
 Incorrectly summarizes material and/or does not discuss course material.
 No discernible analysis.
 Arguments are generally incomprehensible with little or no evidence/examples.
MECHANICS
 Paragraph organization E G F M P
 Proofreading E G F M P
 APA citation style. E G F M P
 Proper academic tone E G F M P
 Paper properly formatted. Y N
EXAMPLES OF CONCEPT EXPLICATION
Part of your task in any academic writing is to demonstrate for your audience/reviewer that you know, understand, and can deploy concepts that are relevant for your analysis. The least this will do is 1) Guide and educate your audience; and 2) Demonstrate your mastery of the material to any evaluator.
Below are examples of how to demonstrate different levels of knowledge in your writing.
Identification (You have memorized the term)
A key concept in psychoanalysis is the Id.
Identification and definition (You have memorized the term and can accurately relate its meaning)
A key concept in psychoanalysis is the Id, which is the part of our consciousness that houses our sexual and violent instincts (Freud, 1989a, 1989b).
Identification, definition, and explanation (You have memorized the term, can accurately relate its meaning, and can describe how the concept works)
A key concept in psychoanalysis is the Id, which is the part of our consciousness that houses our sexual and violent instincts (Freud, 1989a, 1989b). In other words, according to psychoanalysis, the Id is that part of us that operates beneath our awareness, urging us to act in ways that will satisfy our desires.
Identification, definition, explanation, and application via example* (You have memorized the term, can accurately relate its meaning, can describe how the concept works, and can apply the concept)
A key concept in psychoanalysis is the Id, which is the part of our consciousness that houses our sexual and violent instincts (Freud, 1989a, 1989b). In other words, according to psychoanalysis, the Id is that part of us that operates beneath our awareness, urging us to act in ways that will satisfy our desires. For example, the sudden, intense anger we experience as “road rage” could be understood as the Id’s push to enact violence on someone we perceive has wronged us on the road.
*An example for each concept you introduce will not be necessary and may even prove cumbersome. An extremely effective example is one that covers several concepts. Done well this can demonstrate an understanding of how each concept functions and (more importantly) how they function together – See below.
Identification, definition, explanation, example, and synthesis via extended example (You have memorized the term, can accurately relate its meaning, can describe how the concept works, can apply the concept, and can use the concept with other related concepts in a meaningful way)
A key concept in psychoanalysis is the Id, which is the part of our consciousness that houses our sexual and violent instincts (Freud, 1989a, 1989b). In other words, according to psychoanalysis, the Id is that part of us that operates beneath our awareness, urging us to act in ways that will satisfy our desires. For example, the sudden, intense anger we experience as “road rage” could be understood as the Id’s push to enact violence on someone we perceive has wronged us on the road. However, as much as we would like to commit violence, for the most part we do not – the reality principle (the law promises negative consequences for losing one’s temper) provides support for the Super-Ego (fear of punishment) to intervene and repress the violent desire of the Id

THIS TEACHER IS VERY PARTICULAR YOU MUST FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS VERBADUM. PLEASE WRITE AT DOCTORAL LEVEL AND APA FORMAT. READ ALL THE READINGS AND MAKE SURE YOU MAKE REFERENCE TO THE MAIN COURSE BOOK CALLED COMMUNICATION CRITICSIM… BY MALCOLM O SILLARS AND BRUCE GRONBECK.

I attached a sample of a APA paper so you can set up format the same way.

the readings and artivcles and lecture notes are critical. you can use the movie straight out of compton movie is an example . of artrifact. you can use movies, areticles, skits documentaries but it must follow the material as discussed in the book and the readings, pleased let me know if youhave any questions,.

<br>
You will present a reflection of the experiences of the investigation, locating the<br>
demonstrable outcomes in an academic context, with reference to relevant theoretical<br>
analysis and evidence of research. You will be encouraged to include a variety of material to<br>
evidence the development of the investigation, including non-text based material <a href=”https://e.g” target=”_blank”>e.g</a>.<br>
drawings, tables, photographs that serves as an outcome of the project.

1000 word essay

Illustrate and justify your answer with reference to a designer, an artist and an architect.

Designer to use: Tom Dixon
Artist to use: Leonardo Da Vinci
Architect to use: Frank Gehry

Introduction: Definition of creativity and overall description

Main body: 3 paragraphs, each paragraph should include one element of creativity with examples and description and also reference to one of the people mentioned earlier, and how their work used those elements. An artist could be referenced more than once on a paragraph, if they both or all have the sam element.

It’s not an advance level essay, so feel free to include minor mistakes like comma splice etc…

I’m looking for a minimum of 70% and maximum of 80% grade

Please call me: +447724571729, if you have further inquiries. This is an assessment worth 40% of the final grade, and it’s for an academic writing module in a foundation course.

Discussion
As a minimum, discuss the following points:
What is the effect of delaying the rocket start time?
What effect does the ambient temperature have on the run profile?
Maximising chance of achieving 1000mph – What are your recommendations for rocket start time and temperature?
i just want you to discuss this from the bloodhound project

1. Plot distributions (histograms) of each of these four variables, using either:
a. Engineering paper, manually preparing these plots

b. Excel which can prepare these distributions for you

2. Ensure you identify the mean value on each plot and also determine the following statistics to demonstrate the variation of queuing performance:

a. For each variable, calculate the probability that the data will exceed 125, 150, 175 and 200% of the mean

b. Determine each increment until the statistic reaches near zero

c. Again you can do these calculations manually or by Excel

Note: Make graphs out of the excel sheet that I sent you, I need a graph of the interarrival times, the t que, the t ser, and the t sys.