chris, Author at Essay Writers Hub

Analysis of pragmatic failure from the theory of adaption.

i should include these points: 
Chapter Two: Literature Review 
1-Definitions of pragmatic failure 
2-The classifications of pragmatic failure 
3-Analysis of pragmatic failure from the theory of adaption: 
-Failure to Adapt to the Language Users 
-Failure to Adapt to the Physical World 
-Failure to Adapt to the Social World 
-Failure to Adapt to the Mental World 
beside adding more ideas and points

Analyzing a resource that is part of your everyday life.

1. Resource Analysis: (3000 words + bibliography) 
Write an essay analyzing a resource that is part of your everyday life. This could be a resource such as clean air or fresh water, sustenance such as a beverage or food item, access to knowledge such as a piece of scholarship or a database, a mode of communications/transportation, material or media you use in your own creative practice, a film, artwork, or other socio-cultural artifact. Track how this item becomes a resource, how and in what ways it becomes a commodity or a kind of property, and the framework through which it accrues value or exchangeability. How is access to this resource distributed? How does access to this resource allow you certain privileges or exclude others? How does it allow you to feel a certain way in your everyday life? Next, consider how this resource might itself be made more “common” or how this resource might be reframed or rethought in a way that enhances or problematizes the communization of life. You are required to critically discuss the arguments of at least three texts from the required reading list. 
 
The module entails: 
“Commons” are typically defined as resources that we don’t pay for and that are shared by a community. The term finds its legal origins in the shift to early capitalism, and contemporary political theorists have sought to re-invigorate the concept by reconceptualising the notion of the commons as a form of social practice resistant to the reproduction of capitalist growth and uneven power relations. “Theorizing the Commons” surveys the work of political theorists, artists, and activists who have called upon the idiom of “the commons” in order to refute the enclosure of social relations under late capitalism and reimagine the ownership, sharing and dispersal of resources necessary for the institution and maintenance of global justice and sustainability. This module focuses on the history of primitive accumulation and the acceleration of “new enclosures” in the wake of global ecological and financial crises, yet we will also attend to the ways that aesthetic practices might prefigure potential processes of communization. Through close readings of texts from within the Marxist tradition as well as anarchist thought, autonomism, environmentalism, feminist theory, critical race theory, and cultural studies, we will explore the ways in which the structuring principles of late capital—particularly shifting modes of accumulation, ownership, private property, exchange— mediate our understandings of commons and commoning. The main overarching questions to explore include: What is the commons and what are its forms; how have communism, autonomism, anarchism, aesthetics, labor practices, or the university articulated notions of the commons?; how are land, ecology, rights, sense, information and culture constituted as common?; how do aesthetic practices mediate the production of common sense and emergence of communing?; how does the commons adjudicate the relationship between exchange, difference, equality and precarity?

Explain the concepts, method for literature search & synthesis, significance of the research/chosen topic, result/outcome of literature search, reference list.

reference should be between 2010-2015, please to include Australia journal articles 
 
 
Assignment 1 
Weight: 30% advisory mark 
Length: 1500 words 
Task 
Students are required to identify a topic in health or social care and submit a researchable question and a plan for critically reviewing that topic. While the actual critical review happens in Assignment 2, Assignment 1 is about describing what you plan to achieve and how you plan to achieve that in Assignment 2. Please be careful not to turn Assignment 1 into a draft of Assignment 2. The focus in Assignment 1 is on explaining how to conduct a literature review on a topic of your choice, with appropriate method and scope. 
This assignment must cite at least 2 different scholarly textbooks/journal articles to inform how you will conduct your literature review and at least 5 journal articles you consider as suitable to be reviewed in your second assignment. It should contain and expound under the following sections: 
• Introduction (including both about literature review in general and about a contemporary health or social care issue of your choice) 
• The research question/focus and the provisional title of your literature review 
• Definitions of key terms and concepts 
• The dimensions and significance of the research/study topic 
• Search strategy which includes for example literature sources accessed for this review (<a href=”https://i.e” target=”_blank”>i.e</a>. the names of the databases, search engines or journal lists, etc) key words, and inclusion and/or exclusion criteria for selection of literature 
• Titles of the journal articles or research reports you identify so far as suitable to be reviewed in second assignment (<a href=”https://i.e” target=”_blank”>i.e</a>. a minimum of five). (No need to describe the content of these articles. But you do need to provide the publication details in the reference list.) 
• How the evidence will be critically analysed and synthesized 
• Reference list* 
*APA referencing style must be used. Follow the link at the top right of the page for information and examples. 
References should be as current as possible. As a general rule of thumb, literature published before 2000 will not attract marks. However, older research literature can be included for review where necessary and you ensure that its inclusion in the review is well justified (especially in the search strategy section). 
NOTE: This assignment describes what you plan to achieve and how you plan to achieve it. It is NOT a draft of Assignment 2. The focus should be on how to conduct a literature review. 
Marking/Assessment criteria for Assignment 1 
Criteria Example of application Weighting 
Structure: 
• Organisation of material 
• Relevance of topic • The content of the report is organised into sections such as: introduction, research questions, defining the core concepts, method for literature search & synthesis, significance of the research/chosen topic, result/outcome of literature search, reference list. 
• The chosen health care topic is within the boundary of the profession you are in. 
• Current literatures on the chosen topic have room for further research and development. For instance, the topic is not well covered in textbooks. 30% 
Critical Analysis: 
• logically developed argument 
• presentation of accurate evidence • Research questions are grounded in practice, raised from logical argument, and based on overview of general to specific literature 
• provided accurate information for the strategy of literature search such as key words, data sources, refinement strategies, inclusion and exclusion criteria for selection of literature 
• provided credible description of the method to synthesise the nominated literatures forAssignment 2 30% 
Sources: 
• appropriate sources used 
• appropriate acknowledgement of sources 
• consistent and appropriate referencing method • Accessed different sources (<a href=”https://e.g” target=”_blank”>e.g</a>. scholarly text books, peer reviewed journals, reports from government and non-government agencies, conference proceedings, electronic and printed factbooks) in engaging with the relevant literature 
• Referred to adequate number of literatures (<a href=”https://i.e” target=”_blank”>i.e</a>. minimum of two) from different sources to support and guide your approach to conducting a literature review and setting the context and background for the review 
• Nominated adequate number of literatures (<a href=”https://i.e” target=”_blank”>i.e</a>. minimum of five) from different peer reviewed sources for Assignment 2, on the basis of progress made so far. 
• References should be as current as possible. For instance, literature published before year 2000 will not attract mark, unless the old literature has specific foundational value. 
• APA referencing style is consistently followed 20% 
Originality 
• ability to reformulate concepts in your own words 
• imaginative and creative approach • Defined the core concepts in simple words 
• The research questions will allow an innovative analysis of the chosen health care topic 5% 
Writing style 
• clarity 
• fluency 
• succinctness • Sentences are well structured and are unambiguous. Content of the report flows logically and has good clarity. 
• Sentences are not too long 5% 
Use of language 
• Sentences reflect a good communication skill in general. • grammatical sentences 
• correct spelling throughout 
• correct punctuation throughout 5% 
Presentation 
• Professional layout reflecting legibility and clarity • A title page containing; i) Student name, number & course ii) Assignment number & assignment title written in full iii) Unit number & name iv) Name of the unit coordinator v) Due date of the assignment 
• Table of Contents 
• Appropriate section headings 
• Titles for Tables and Figures 
• Double-line spacing 
• Legible font size (12 font is best) and type 
• Length is consistent with the prescribed word limit ± 10%. 5% 
Total 
100% 
Note: Students are encouraged to add to the sample format provided in this table. 
Submission

Evaluate the duties, leadership opportunities, and risks associated with environmental regulation for multinational corporations such as ABC Inc.

magine that you have been hired as an Environmental Compliance Manager for a multinational corporation named ABC, Inc. The corporation that you work for is a manufacturer of pesticide, agriculture fertilizer, and herbicide. Prepare an eight- to ten-page Final Project (excluding the title and reference pages) that addresses each of the following three parts from a business perspective. All three parts of this assignment should be submitted as one document. Part I 
 
Create a systemic approach (<a href=”https://e.g” target=”_blank”>e.g</a>., steps, flow chart, or directions) for ABC Inc.’s compliance with the following federal statutes. 
RCRA 
CERCLA 
TSCA 
FIFRA 
CWA 
CAA 
EPCRA 
You may prepare Part I of your project as a table, a flowchart, an outline with necessary steps listed in order, or in paragraph format. 
 
Part II 
 
Create a step-by-step plan for ABC Inc.’s risk management and for minimizing ABC Inc.’s liability exposure from environmental liability. 
 
You may prepare Part II of your project as a table, a flow chart, an outline with necessary steps listed in order, or in paragraph format. 
 
Part III 
 
Evaluate the duties, leadership opportunities, and risks associated with environmental regulation for multinational corporations such as ABC Inc. in global business. 
 
Part III of your project must be in paragraph format and should be a minimum of five pages. 
 
Writing the Final Project 
 
The Final Project: 
Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length, excluding the title and references pages, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. 
Must include a cover page that includes: 
Title of paper 
Student’s name 
Course name and number 
Instructor’s name 
Date submitted 
Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement. 
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. 
Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph. 
Must use at least eight resources in addition to the course textbook, six of which need to come from the Ashford Library. 
Must use APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center to document all sources. 
Must include, as the final page, a reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing <a href=”https://Center.Focus” target=”_blank”>Center.Focus</a> of the Final Projectide.

Examine the Auditing Standards before reorganization and the reorganized Auditing Standards.

Required 
 
1. Discuss the role of the PCAOB as it relates to auditors. Why is the PCAOB important to auditors? (between 2 – 3 pages) 
 
2. How does a proposed rule become an effective rule (<a href=”https://pcaobus.org” target=”_blank”>pcaobus.org</a>)? 
 
3. On the PCAOB’s website, examine the Auditing Standards before reorganization and the reorganized Auditing Standards. Why do you think the auditing standards were reorganized? How might the reorganization impact professional auditors? (between 2 – 3 pages) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Include a complete citation of the case

Personal qualities and development and how they have influenced your career choice; your reasons for this particular degree in relation to your academic background, professional .

The University question is (In 750 to 1,000 words, state your professional plans and career objectives (Goal Statement). Please include your personal qualities and development and how they have influenced your career choice; your reasons for this particular degree in relation to your academic background, professional work experience, and career goals; and your reason for selecting your program at George Mason University. 
 
it is the same information of the last order (my own purpose)

Strategy that you could utilize to ensure that all applicants meet the identified job requirements for your organization.

This is a continuation of the order number 81534075. 
 
Identify three (3) job requirements (<a href=”https://e.g” target=”_blank”>e.g</a>., needed certifications, previous work experience, external influences, etc.) that could apply to your chosen scenario. Determine two (2) ways these requirements could impact staffing at your organization. Next, suggest one (1) strategy that you could utilize to ensure that all applicants meet the identified job requirements for your organization. Justify your response. 
<a href=”https://2.Outline” target=”_blank”>2.Outline</a> a long-term recruitment plan that contains at least four (4) components, is aligned with your company’s recruitment strategy, but also addresses possible job skill or credential shortages. Note: Consider concepts such as succession planning and hiring retirees. 
<a href=”https://3.Describe” target=”_blank”>3.Describe</a> three (3) branding strategies that you would employ to attract qualified applicants to your organization. Next, suggest three (3) communication methods that you would utilize to reach out to applicants. Predict the outcome of integrating your branding strategies and communication methods at your organization. Provide a rationale for your response. 
<a href=”https://4.Determine” target=”_blank”>4.Determine</a> two (2) selection processes for recruiting new employees that could apply to your chosen scenario and then identify five (5) selection criteria that you could use when hiring new employees. Next, analyze the effect of the five (5) identified selection criteria on long-term employee retention and preservation of organizational knowledge. Justify your response. 
<a href=”https://5.Suggest” target=”_blank”>5.Suggest</a> two (2) assessment methods that you could employ to select new employees for your organization and then analyze the validity and reliability of each method in regards to the job your organization is offering. Next, identify four (4) job predictors that you believe can assess candidates’ knowledge, skills, abilities, and other skills and experiences (KSAO’s). Provide support for your rationale. 
6. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment.

Discussed the meaning of community and the importance of becoming active in its betterment.

W1 Assignment 1 “Personal SWOT Analysis”
Personal SWOT Analysis
Overview:
Through the readings and the lectures this week, we have discussed the nature of service-learning and the gains that can often be associated with community involvement. We have also discussed the meaning of community and the importance of becoming active in its betterment. While it is valuable to look at our communities and assess the problems that need to be addressed and the opportunities to aid in solving those issues, it is important to start by assessing our own strengths and weaknesses to identify opportunities to better ourselves.

This week’s assignment is all about you. Unlike the other assignments in this course, your work in this assignment will be a private conversation (of sorts) between you and your instructor. Be as honest as you can in your assessment so you can use this information to make the most of your education as you move forward in this class and through your future learning experiences.
What is a SWOT analysis?
If you are a business student, chances are, you’ve been asked to create a SWOT analysis on a company or organization in one or more of your previous courses. For other students, this may be a new experience. In either case, you should find this a useful tool.
A SWOT analysis is a tool for evaluating the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (or SWOT) associated with something—usually a company, organization, or project, but can be applied to analyze an idea, an argument, or, as we are doing in this assignment, a person.
We separate the ideas of strengths and weaknesses as internal factors (personal strengths and weaknesses), from the ideas of opportunities and threats as external factors (outside opportunities and threats to learning). These factors are usually presented in a chart with bullet-points followed by a brief narrative about each factor.
Internal Factors Strengths
SWOT
Analysis Opportunities External Factors
Weaknesses Threats
The first step in completing a SWOT analysis is to identify the specific areas being analyzed. For the purposes of this assignment, you are asked to analyze the skills you acquired throughout your general education so far. The categories we will analyze are defined as:
1. Communication skills;
2. Critical thinking skills;
3. Respect for diversity;
4. Professional, social, and ethical responsibility; and
5. Lifelong learning practices
(see “University Learning Outcomes” as defined in the Grantham University Catalog).
Assignment Criteria:
Complete a personal SWOT analysis evaluating your understanding and skills in the five following categories:
1. Communication skills;
2. Critical thinking skills;
3. Respect for diversity;
4. Professional, social, and ethical responsibility; and
5. Lifelong learning practices
Your assignment should include:
A SWOT graph with bullet-points defining your strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats as they relate to the five university learning objectives.
A brief narrative describing each defined trait.
There is no page-length requirement for this assignment, however; you should make every effort to provide a complete and accurate personal analysis. Pay close attention to detail, including grammar, usage, design, and depth. You may want to take the time to create several drafts before submitting the final version of this assignment.

Identified platform and the value of the technologies used in supporting the infrastructure.

-business individual report assignment

2,000 words
Your task is to produce a report that analytically and critically assess a real-world e-business platform (this would be the ERP system). Provide a background on the company that delivers the platform and elaborate on the e-business strategy that has enabled or hindered the company in achieving and/ or maintaining competitiveness. Question you may ask yourself includes: what does this company do”, “what is the business and information strategy of the platform”, “what is the marketplace and marketing strategy of the platform”, and “what is the size of the company”. Using concepts and theories in this portion of the module, specifically consider the: (a) Information technology (IT) infrastructure of the identified platform and the value of the technologies used in supporting the infrastructure; (b) risks and ethical issues associated with the information use and information management for the platform; and

Deliverable The individual report should include:
a) Cover Page
b) Executive Summary (250 words)
c) Table of Contents
d) List of Figures and List of Tables
e) Background (overview of the investigated platform and the company that delivers the platform)
f) IT infrastructure and value (analysing the devices, facilities and components of the platform as well as the benefits of the platform’s functions)
g) Risks and ethical issues (the main part of the task where you analyse the risks and ethical issues associated with the platform, its deployment, use and/or management). Include Risk assessment.
h) Conclusions (summarising the main insights from the analysis with concluding remarks)
i) References (List of sources used in the report)
j) Appendix (Supporting material such as in-depth analysis of investigated platform and the e-business challenges confronted by the platform

Use a variety of visual material, such as tables, charts, diagrams or photographs to demonstrate your point.

Critical evaluation of effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in prevention or delaying progression of diabetes in adults who are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

I need the protocol of my final project. I have listed below the protocol layout with the sections I want you to fill with the specified number of words and details of required information. I would like to have my last assignment (order ID 81476300)author to do this job for me and continue with me on the project throughout next year after completing this protocol. 
 
This is the protocol layout. 
 
 
Title 
Critical evaluation of effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in prevention or delaying progression of diabetes in adults who are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. A literature review. 
 
Lay Summary (200 words) 
This section should contain: 
• Succinct overview of the study in ‘lay’ language. 
 
 
Background (400 words) 
This section: 
• Should demonstrate the ‘gap’ in the literature 
• Rationale for study <a href=”https://e.g” target=”_blank”>e.g</a>. previous audit has demonstrated……. Or new directive/service introduced 
• Context for study 
• Not full literature review at this stage but should provide sufficient evidence that this study is required and ‘do-able’ 
 
 
Aims and Objectives (100 words) 
This section: 
• Should state the aim of the study 
• Should include the objectives (what we need) to achieve the aim. 
• Should use process words such as Identify, assess, evaluate, explore, outline, discuss, analyse, etc. 
 
 
Approach and Methods (500 words) 
This section: 
• Should discuss, what is the overall methodology that addresses the study (the title)? Audit, literature review, qualitative, or quantitative? 
• Why is literature review is the best methodology to answer the title question (ie this study) 
• Be clear about methodology 
• Approach must be justified with the use of supporting literature 
• Need to include some reading on selected methodology (literature review) 
• Why is this the best method? 
• Suggested inclusion/exclusion criteria 
 
 
Likely Benefits (100 words) 
This section: 
• Should state the likely benefits to the: 
• general <a href=”https://e.g” target=”_blank”>e.g</a>. to the NHS, to our understanding of an issue, to inform health care practice. 
• local <a href=”https://e.g” target=”_blank”>e.g</a>. to inform policy in your organisation. 
 
References (15-20 references) 
This section should include the references that are: 
• Key literature consulted to establish project: 
– Aim 
– Objectives, 
– Methodology 
– Methods