Discuss the primary points of disagreement between sincere and intelligent proponents of both sides.

In your paper,

  • Present a revised argument in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line.
  • Present a counterargument in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line.
  • Provide support for each premise of your counterargument. Clarify the meaning of the premise and supporting evidence for the premise.
    • Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments, or other ways of demonstrating the truth of the premise (for more ideas about how to support the truth of premises take a look at the instructor guidance for this week). This section should include at least one scholarly source.
  • Explain how the conclusion of the counterargument follows from its premises. [One paragraph]
  • Discuss the primary points of disagreement between sincere and intelligent proponents of both sides. [One to two paragraphs]
    • For example, you might list any premises or background assumptions on which you think such proponents would disagree and briefly state what you see as the source of the disagreement, you could give a brief explanation of any reasoning that you think each side would find objectionable, or you could do a combination of these.
  • Present the best objection to your original argument. Clearly indicate what part of the argument your objection is aimed at, and provide a paragraph of supporting evidence for the objection. Reference at least one scholarly research source. [One to two paragraphs]

The Counterargument Paper

  • Must be 500 to 800 words in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style.
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
  • The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined.
  • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style

Identify the risk factors associated with the selected health promotion programs.

Health Promotion Program

Assume that you are working in a community health department. The department has some federal money that it wants to allocate to two health promotion programs from the following:

  • Decrease in deaths from cardiovascular disease
  • Decrease in deaths from breast cancer
  • Decrease in teenage pregnancy
  • Decrease in cigarette smoking
  • Decrease in incidence of diabetes
  • Decrease in motor vehicle accidents
  • Decrease in osteoporosis and hip fractures among women
  • Decrease in obesity

Identify the health promotion programs that you would want to investigate and get them approved by your instructor.

Write a 3- to 4-page report in a Microsoft Word document, addressing the following questions:

  • Identify the risk factors associated with the selected health promotion programs.
  • What is the target population associated with the selected health promotion program? Consider the hypothetical target population, consisting of middle-aged women, male adolescent gang members, premature infants, etc., and describe the characteristics of each program.
  • What are the risk factors that you want to focus on in order to achieve the objective of the health promotion program?
  • What intervention would you recommend to be most appropriate to reduce exposure to these risk factors? You can choose at what level of intervention you want to implement each program (primary, secondary, tertiary health intervention).
  • What will be the process by which this intervention will achieve the goal of the program?
  • What will be the anticipated outcome of this intervention?
                                             ASSIGNMENT 2

Importance of Vaccination

Mary’s one year old daughter is due to be given the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine during her next visit to the doctor. Mary is upset and concerned because one of her friend’s sons became ill after a similar vaccination. She has also heard rumors that MMR vaccine causes rubella. Mary was also told that her daughter will need to be vaccinated before Mary returns to work.

Mary is not alone. Many parents face this issue. Therefore, it is important for Mary and all such parents to make decisions that are best for their children, based on facts and not emotions.

Place yourself in the role of a health care worker, submit to the discussion area your plan to validate the importance of vaccination by addressing the following questions:

  • Why are vaccinations necessary components of the healthcare programs?
  • Are there reasons for people not being vaccinated despite of such elaborate healthcare programs? Explain.
  • What are the consequences of people not being vaccinated?
  • What is the impact of religious, cultural, legal, and ethical issues that parents need to consider before vaccination?
  • What type of information will help the parents make an informed decision about vaccinating their children?
                               ASSIGNMENT 3
Analysis of Various Health Components for a Specific Region

Using the South University Online Library or the Internet, research and read about a health issue in specific regions in the United States. Some examples of the topics for your research could be:

  • HIV or AIDS in African-Americans in Southern United States.
  • Alcoholism in Native Americans in Midwestern United States.
  • Diabetes among Navajo people in Southwest United States.
  • Obesity among low-income children in Eastern United States.

Note: You may choose another population and region, these are just examples. You may also visit the Library of this course to gather data for your research.

Based on your research and data gathered, create a report in a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document, that addresses the following:

  • The main issues being discussed and the message you wish to deliver to the affected population.
  • Population affected.
  • Age, gender, race, socioeconomic class, sexual orientation, religion, etc. of the target population.
  • Segment of the United States population affected along with the percentage.
  • Social factors such as culture and religion that may influence the burden of the disease.
  • Ethical issues that may be factors in developing and implementing prevention and intervention programs for the disease.
  • Various components of the health care system that can assist the community.
  • Methods that the health care system should use to assist the community. (For example, state health care systems may revise or develop new policies to address the issue).

Support your responses with examples and a structured document free of spelling and grammatical errors, and appropriate references at the end of the document of sources you cited in the paper; Cite any sources in accordance to APA guidelines.

 

Discuss important to support what you say with relevant citations in the APA format from both the course materials and outside resources.

Research Paper, FormatAPA, Course level Master, SubjectNursing, pages 4, Spacing Double Spacing
,sources4
Discussion Questions
It is important to support what you say with relevant citations in the APA format from both the course materials and outside resources. Include not only the nursing resource database, but also those pertaining to education, business, and human resources.
Discussion Question
Using Minitab
This week, you learned about the statistical software applications used to analyze data for research analysis. For this week’s discussion, you will use Minitab to run descriptive statistics, create graphs and respond to the following:
•How could you use Minitab descriptive statistics for data analysis research?
•What are your plans for learning more about Minitab and how will the information you learned about this software be of benefit in your future analysis of research data?
Refer to this week’s readings and video tutorials before starting this two part discussion question assignment. You will also have access to the Assignment Resources Step-by-Step Guide, accessed through the Assignment Resources Icon located to the right of the grading criteria above.
Step 1: Entering Data
Open Minitab
You will now use Minitab to enter a sample dataset by following the steps below and referring to the examples in the Assignment Step-by-Step guide. Begin by opening Minitab. Once open, you will see two windows. The Session Window is in the top half of the screen and the Worksheet is below. Only one window is active at a time.
Dataset Options
In many cases, researchers may have the data from their study in another software package like Microsoft Excel. However, if the data is not available in a software spreadsheet you can manually enter the data. You may now choose to populate your Minitab worksheet using the provided Excel worksheet in Option 1 or try Manual Data Entry by following the instructions in Option 2.
Option 1: Using Excel to populate Minitab
To access the Excel worksheet populated with data, go to the Data Set Icon located to the right of the grading criteria above. You can copy and paste the data set directly from Excel into Minitab.
Or
Option 2: Manual Data Entry
In the Worksheet window, type “Age†in C1. Enter the numbers as shown in the dataset below. Enter the remaining data as shown below (set up your column labels i.e., variable). The measure reflects math anxiety and the study variables (cringe, uneasy, afraid, worried, understand) the math anxiety range is from 1–5 with low being the least and 5 the highest.
AgeCringeUneasyAfraidWorriedUnderstand
2853443
3425321
2544425
5634312
2354334
2915323
3033525
5925512
4542533
3812411
3332432
4742345
2415344
2954213
5331521
4844153
2725434
3444325
2645232
3655543
Step 2: Run Descriptive Statistics
Now that your data is in Minitab, you will look at the descriptive statistics for this dataset. Select the Ribbon at the top titled “Statistics,†and then select “Descriptive Statistics†. Under the “Data tab†select a variable, under the “Statistics tab†check all the boxes, then click “OK†.
Discussion Question Part 1:
How could you use Minitab descriptive statistics for data analysis research? Write about your experience running descriptive statistics. Use the results in the Session Window to support your response. Then add to your discussion with the information you learn when completing Step 3.
Step 3: Minitab and Graphs
You will now look at graphing. Select the Ribbon at the top titled “Graph,†then select “Histogram,†and then select “Simple.†Choose one of the variables and select “Ok”. You can create other Histogram graphs by choosing different variables. You can also choose from the other ten graph choices shown on the Graph ribbon. Remember you can use the left navigation column to access your work.
Discussion Question Part 2:
What are your plans for learning more about Minitab and how will the information you learned about this software be of benefit in your future analysis of research data? Copy and paste your graph(s) in a Word document and attach to your discussion response.
Textbook .

 

Grove, S., Burns, N., Gray, J. (2013). The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence, 7th Edition. [VitalSource Bookshelf Online]. Retrieved from https://digitalbookshelf.southuniversity.edu/#/books/978-1-4557-0736-2/

Develop a matrix that identifies specific departmental needs for a company that you are familiar with.

Assignment Preparation:

Activities include completing the SkillSoft® course, independent student reading, and research.

SkillSoft® course, “Cisco DESGN 2.1: Network Design Methodology Overview.”

Assignment:

Develop a matrix that identifies specific departmental needs for a company that you are familiar with.

Include the types of communication needed for each department such as email, web use, etc. and then estimate the amount of network traffic that would be needed to meet business needs.

Use information gained in the SkillSoft® module and additional outside research including your course texts to determine reasonable estimates.

Provide an overall total needed for the organization which will impact the ISP connection that will be needed, as well as equipment and software.

Write a 2- to 3-page paper to explain your estimates.

Note. You must do additional research that includes a minimum of two additional sources in addition to use of your texts.

Describe the strengths and limitations of these models.

Plagiarism Free,  APA Style,

Research should be  from scholarly, peer-reviewed sources.

 

Need back on Monday December 21, 2015 3pm central time.

Assignment – Introduction to Business Planning Plan 

 

In 1,200-words, Research a minimum of 4 typical business plan models.

 

  1. Compare and contrast these typical business plan models.
  2. Describe the strengths and limitations of these models.
  3. Compare these models to the business plan models in either Microsoft Project or Apple Merlin.
  4. Select the model that you believe will work best for your assigned CLC Business Plan; explain your rationale for this selection.

 

Discuss why is this topic important to health information systems quality.

thoroughly assess the problems or issues that were identified in the case as well as the solutions or conclusions that were made regarding the case. Next identify and describe a related health information systems topic that encompasses a health care information systems issue; choose one that you feel would be a gap (a breach) or parity (a value) in or to the case. The topic should align with the selected case, for example: systems data collection or patient privacy/breach of patient privacy.  Then, write a thesis statement and introductory paragraph explaining the issue to which you plan to propose a solution; include the topic you chose, its relation to the selected case, and the specific gap or parity you identified.  Your thesis statement and introductory paragraph should be 300 to 600 words (one to three pages) in length and must provide a rationale for why you chose this health information systems topic. You must utilize at least two scholarly sources, including a minimum of one scholarly source    Additionally, you must answer the following questions:

  • If you were in charge of addressing the issue within your selected case, what would your leadership role entail with regard to the proposed project?
  • Why is this topic important to health information systems quality?
  • What is the issue or quality identified? What improvements are needed? What features are identified?
  • How does this impact patient care?
  • How does it impact management and staff (the organization as a whole)?
  • What are the current conclusions drawn from the case?

Your chosen topic will be woven into the assignment for the subsequent weeks of this course. Every week, you will apply your newly acquired skills and concepts to your chosen topic, which will be incorporated into your Initial and Final Proposal in Weeks Five and Six. Your Final Proposal will be presented with your chosen multimedia platform used for your Final Presentation in Week Six.  Review the Minnesota Department of Health SMART and Meaningful Objectives. You will need to understand the concepts presented in this document in order to write your Initial and Final Proposals.  For more information regarding the requirements for these assignments, visit the assignment links in Weeks Five and Six, located in the left-hand navigation panel of your online classroom.

The Topic Selection & Thesis Statement:

  1. Must be 1 to 3 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), double-spaced and formatted according to APA style
  2. Must Include a title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
  4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
  6. Must use two to three scholarly sources,
  7. Must document all sources in APA style,

Analyze how e-learning readiness has affected your success at Ashford University.

E-Learning for Training and Potential Barriers

In Chapter Five of the textbook, e-learning as a method of training is discussed. In Chapter Six, potential barriers of e-learning readiness to implementing e-learning as a training method are examined. In a two- to three- page paper (excluding the title and reference pages), examine e-learning and the barriers. Include the following in your paper:

  1. Describe e-learning as a training method.
  2. Describe the potential barriers of e-learning readiness.
  3. Analyze how e-learning readiness has affected your success at Ashford University.
  4. Explain what a trainer can do to prepare learners for e-learning.

Your paper must include in-text citations and references from at least two scholarly sources, excluding the textbook, and be formatted according to APA guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Identify the meaning and nature of various crime scene indicators including pattern analysis, evidence characteristics, primary and secondary crime scenes and offender motivation.

 

The victim is an African-American 55-year-old retired nurse who was active in her church; she was divorced 12 years ago, and her ex-husband is not considered a suspect (he has an alibi for the time of the murder). As far as it is known, she is not currently dating or seeing anyone. She has two children (son and daughter, now adults). She now lives alone with a golden retriever (named Keeper). She lives in nice neighborhood (middle class, largely African-American) with a relatively low crime rate. It is considered a stable neighborhood but does have a few transients. The victim is very tall for a woman: 6 feet tall and 180 pounds.

 

Martha lived across the street from the park in which her children played when they were young. Her home is a two-story house with a basement and fenced-in backyard. To the left side of her house lives a nosy elderly neighbor; the house to her right was for sale and unoccupied at the time of her death.

 

At the time of her death, she kept her dog outside in her yard tied to a chain-link fence. Keeper normally barks at strangers, and he has been kept leashed since he has escaped from the backyard in the past. In fact, he has gone missing for days at a time.

 

On the day of her death, Martha attended choir practice at her local church and returned home at 10 PM. She then called her mother and talked for 45 minutes (this is typical for her). At 11:30 at night, the lights went off (according to the elderly neighbor), and this is again typical for Martha.

 

Around 4:30 AM the next day, a newspaper deliveryman noticed smoke coming from her residence and called the fire department. The arriving firemen noticed a trail of blood leading out of the house that lasted for a block and a half before a street-sweeper wiped out the trail.

 

Her house was found unlocked, and the firemen discovered that two fires had been set in the house but had already gone out by themselves. The fires were set in the living room and kitchen; the arsonist’s modus operandi (MO) was to pile papers on top of the stove and then turn on the burners; the killer then attempted to burn her body by lighting paper on the stove and then using that to set the papers piles up on her body.

 

Investigation revealed that the offender entered the back basement window (it was a very large window). Her neighbor did not see anything (she was probably asleep), but the dog should have seen the killer and yet did not bark. Keeper was found still alive and tied to the fence.

 

Investigators noticed a blood trail from the basement bathroom up the stairs into the first floor of the home—the killer apparently cut him- or herself badly while entering through the window.

 

The victim’s body was found in living room. She was face-down, her left foot burned by fire, but that was extent of the damage to the victim from the fire, and fire damage to her home was slight. The victim’s robe and nightgown were pulled over her head, and her panties were pulled down around to her ankles; it is believed that this happened postmortem.

 

There was a postmortem stab wound to her thigh. The cause of death was manual strangulation; the strangulation was very violent, with a fractured hyoid bone present in the neck, and evidence of a crushed trachea. The lack of soot in her lungs indicates that she was dead before the fire started. Contusions to her mouth and scratches on her face were also evident, presumably inflicted by the killer during a struggle with the victim. A human bite mark on her left breast was also detected. The bite mark was very irregular, and from the lack of blood around the wound, happened postmortem. No semen was found at the scene, and but there is considerable evidence of a violent, traumatic sexual assault that would have resulted in considerable injury had the victim survived.

 

Other Facts

 

  • A rug was placed over the head of the victim.
  • A sash from the dress she wore earlier that evening is missing.
  • The victim probably would have heard the offender entering her home and encountered him or her in the living room.
  • A knife is missing from her kitchen and was not recovered from the scene.
  • The killer apparently looted her bedroom after killing her (no evidence of a struggle in bedroom), and while he or she was still bleeding. The victim’s pocketbook was dumped and searched. A pillowcase from her bed is missing.
  • Her jewelry, camera, and some cash she kept in a drawer are missing, but a check with surviving family members indicated that none of the missing items were particularly valuable, and the amount of cash missing was probably less than $50. Her checkbook and credit cards were still in her house.
  • Her time of death is estimated between 12:30 PM and 4:00 AM.

    Answer the following questions:

 

1.    Is this an example of an organized or disorganized offender? Explain.

 

2.    Where does the killer live relative to the crime scene? (Give his or her residence from the crime scene in blocks.)

 

3.    What was his or her primary motive for the crime?

 

4.    What the purpose of the arson?

 

5.    Was the fire the work of an experienced arsonist?

 

6.    Why did the killer take the sash?

 

7.    Why did the killer take the pillowcase? What did he or she use it for?

 

8.    How tall is the killer relative to the victim? (Answering this correctly will narrow the suspect pool).

 

9.    How does the dog know the offender? It is obvious that the dog knew the offender (why else wouldn’t he bark?), and how? Please note that the neighbor did not see anyone hanging around Martha’s backyard.

 

10.       Did the offender and victim have a prior interaction, and if so, what was the nature of that interaction?

 

11.       Why is the bite mark irregularly shaped? If the victim was still alive, the irregular bite mark might be caused by her pulling away or pushing at the killer while he or she was biting her. However, since the bite mark occurred after her death, that cannot be the reason.

 

12.       Why did the killer put a rug over the victim’s face after her death?

 

13.       What else can you add about the offender that will help with the investigation?

 

14.       Using the typology of rapists, what type of rapist would the killer be classified as?

 

 

 

 

 

OBJECTIVE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT:Demonstrate deductive reasoning and critical thinking skills through application in hypothetical examples of criminal behavior.

 

Define and utilize concepts necessary to profile cases such as modus operandi, signature behavior, and crime scene reconstruction and offender typology.

 

Identify the characteristics of false reports of crime and staged crime scenes.

 

Demonstrate an understanding of the categories of abnormal behavior that are likely to be encountered in criminal behavior.

 

Identify the meaning and nature of various crime scene indicators including pattern analysis, evidence characteristics, primary and secondary crime scenes and offender motivation.

 

Apply the use and limitations of organized/disorganized offender criteria to hypothetical crime scenes.

 

Demonstrate understanding of the principles by which behavior reveals motive and how motive and personality impact behavior.

Identify interdisciplinary uses of humor in your professional life or future career goals, and formulate a plan for responsible and ethical applications of and responses to humor in your career setting.

The Core Assessment Paper for LE300R must apply the ethical and psychological theories of humor learned in this course in an analytical examination and interdisciplinary discussion of one or more examples of humor in the today’s culture. The paper should synthesize perspectives from multiple disciplines and present an analytical viewpoint of the example(s) being used for the paper. The paper must:

  • Identify interdisciplinary uses of humor in your professional life or future career goals, and formulate a plan for responsible and ethical applications of and responses to humor in your career setting.
  • Create and synthesize a concept for globally responsible values and attitudes toward humor in social media, Pop Culture (television and movies) or other venues that have diverse audience demographics.

The Core Assessment is to be an academic paper demonstrating sophisticated, integrative and interdisciplinary learning about the theories, ethics and psychology of humor in real-world environments.  Although the paper may briefly reference comedic cinema, humorous books, comedic television programs or other Pop Culture vehicles, the paper is not to be a ‘movie review’ or ‘summary’ of an entertainment vehicle.

How many references will I need to use?

  • You will need at least FIVE outside references, in addition to the required textbooks for this course.  Be sure to have at least five FULL pages of writing in addition to your reference page.

What type of references can we use?

  • You MUST use both course textbooks in your final paper as reference sources.
  • For the other sources (at least five) you should primarily use academic journals (we have a wealth of them in our online library).  Do NOT use Wikipedia, Yahoo Answers, or other non-academic sources.
  • One way to start researching your paper is to find articles in academic journals about the ethics, psychology, social interactions and other elements in your career field, and apply the theories of humor from our course to the information in these studies.

What writing style should we use?

  • Use the APA style manual for in-text citations as well as your reference page.  If you have questions, se

Briefly explain the research you’re doing, your methodology, and findings.

 

As part of your course, you are required to review and critique 2 public policy papers written on budgetary topics. You will be provided with a series of options to consider. The title of each policy paper that you critique must be submitted in advance and is worth 10 points. Each completed critique must be between 5 and 7 pages in length and incorporate APA style and is worth 90 points.

 

Policy Paper Title Submission #1 is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 2.

Policy Paper Review and Critique #1 is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 4.

Policy Paper Title Submission #2 is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 6.

Policy Paper Review and Critique #2 is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 8.

 

You are to structure your paper in the following manner:

 

  1. Title Page

 

  1. Abstract:
  2. Briefly explain the research you’re doing, your methodology, and findings.

 

  1. Introduction:
  2. What policy paper are you evaluating and criticizing? Who wrote it? Why is it important to critique this paper? What is the thesis or main argument of the paper? What are you attempting to achieve or communicate?

 

  1. Summarize the Paper:
  2. Present a concise summary of the paper you’re critiquing, which also highlights what you’re attempting to argue.
  3. Identify what the author is arguing, and what evidence he supplies.In other words, how does he support his argument? Is he underutilizing data?

 

  1. Argument You’re Presenting — Criticism and Judgment:
  2. Did the author convince you? Did he accomplish his purpose?Is the material well organized? Does he leave out or dismiss relevant data?
  3. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the paper?
  4. Discuss the worth, validity, and utility of the paper you’re critiquing

 

  1. Conclusion:
  2. Summarize the argument in the policy paper you’re critiquing and then your critique – how have you proven your argument?