|
Points: 200
|
Assignment 1: Research Paper
|
|
Criteria
|
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
|
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
|
Fair
70-79% C
|
Proficient
80-89% B
|
Exemplary
90-100% A
|
| 1. Review one (1) transnational crime.
Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely reviewed one (1) transnational crime. |
Insufficiently reviewed one (1) transnational crime. |
Partially reviewed one (1) transnational crime. |
Satisfactorily reviewed one (1) transnational crime. |
Thoroughly reviewed one (1) transnational crime. |
| 2. Compare and contrast the two (2) countries for their definition of the crime, crime rate, and tools used to measure the crime.
Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the two (2) countries for their definition of the crime, crime rate, and tools used to measure the crime. |
Insufficiently compared and contrasted the two (2) countries for their definition of the crime, crime rate, and tools used to measure the crime. |
Partially compared and contrasted the two (2) countries for their definition of the crime, crime rate, and tools used to measure the crime. |
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the two (2) countries for their definition of the crime, crime rate, and tools used to measure the crime. |
Thoroughly compared and contrasted the two (2) countries for their definition of the crime, crime rate, and tools used to measure the crime. |
| 3. Determine each country’s legal traditions and their major influences on crime definition, rate, and measurement.
Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined each country’s legal traditions and their major influences on crime definition, rate, and measurement. |
Insufficiently determined each country’s legal traditions and their major influences on crime definition, rate, and measurement. |
Partially determined each country’s legal traditions and their major influences on crime definition, rate, and measurement. |
Satisfactorily determined each country’s legal traditions and their major influences on crime definition, rate, and measurement. |
Thoroughly determined each country’s legal traditions and their major influences on crime definition, rate, and measurement. |
| 4. Examine the extent to which crime statistics compiled in different countries can adequately be compared. Provide support for the response.
Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely examined the extent to which crime statistics compiled in different countries can adequately be compared. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the response. |
Insufficiently examined the extent to which crime statistics compiled in different countries can adequately be compared. Insufficiently provided support for the response. |
Partially examined the extent to which crime statistics compiled in different countries can adequately be compared. Partially provided support for the response. |
Satisfactorily examined the extent to which crime statistics compiled in different countries can adequately be compared. Satisfactorily provided support for the response. |
Thoroughly examined the extent to which crime statistics compiled in different countries can adequately be compared. Thoroughly provided support for the response. |
| 5. 3 references
Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
| 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |