What three specific strategies will you use in the future to support your own development of diversity consciousness and skills.

Eeqirement : 12 font double space ,apa format,cites ,references ,cover page , follow directions to the fullest.

 

 

In 2 or 3 pages, address the following questions:

  1. What three specific strategies will you use in the future to support your own development of diversity consciousness and skills?
  2. What three specific strategies will you use in the future to support the development of diversity consciousness and skills in others, including your learners and/or colleagues?
  3. What concerns, if any, do you have about implementing this plan?
  4. Resources: Bucher, R. D. (2015). Diversity consciousness: Opening our minds to people, cultures, and opportunities (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Explain how this new model might help leaders better understand the organization.

Final Project Component: Section 6—Adding Complexity

The Assignment:

This week, you continue your Consultancy Report for the executive leadership of your selected organization. Review the Final Project Template for proper APA formatting and details for this week’s component.

In 3–4 pages, complete the following:

o Using your original PowerPoint model, expand your model of the organization to include the following (this model will be inserted as a figure into your Final Project Template):

o Detectors

o Effectors

o Networks

o Expand your description of the organization by:

o Describing three or four agents (including detectors and effectors).

o Explaining the relationships among three or four agents.

o Explaining the flow of information, material, or energy across networks.

o Explaining how two or three agents may be aggregated.

o Explaining two or three nonlinear (positive or negative) feedback loops.

o Explaining three or four key organizational processes.

o Explain how this new model might help leaders better understand the organization.

o Explain how this new model might help leaders improve their decision-making skills.

o Recommend how the organization might improve with a better understanding of the various structures and processes in the organization.

Include at least two citations/references to current literature to support your explanations and recommendations to the executive leadership.

Compare the possible legal breaches of Kate’s manager against your own manager’s behavior. Utilize scholarly research on leadership theory as justification.

The workplace can be an especially stressful environment. Personal conflicts between coworkers, fear of layoffs, and heavy workloads can be causes of negative stress. This stress can be carried to our homes and after-work activities, impacting personal health. Allowing these stressors to build and intensify will only further impair the work environment. For this assignment, you are required to review a scenario regarding a woman (Kate) who has experienced negative stress stemming from her work environment. Then, you will compare your own conflict management skills and experiences against Kate’s experiences. Follow the directions below to write an 8–10-page report on conflict management.

Review the following scenario:

Kate has been employed by a well-known manufacturing company for 12 years. She is the only female on her line and the fastest worker. She has been promoted several times through mergers and acquisitions, but has always been looked over for a senior management position. Kate believes she is qualified for advancement but thinks her manager has a problem with her personally. To top it off, Kate did not receive a semiannual or annual review, which would have resulted in a raise. Her coworkers (all males) have urged her to go to management and report what she believes to be discriminatory behavior from her immediate manager.

Now, complete the following tasks:

    1. Discuss a situation you have been in where you felt you were passed over for a promotion, made to feel indifferent, or were discriminated against. Compare and contrast your story with Kate’s.
    2. Compare the possible ethical breaches of Kate’s manager against your own manager’s behavior. Utilize scholarly research on leadership theory as justification.
    3. Compare the possible legal breaches of Kate’s manager against your own manager’s behavior. Utilize scholarly research on leadership theory as justification.
    4. Recommend an approach Kate could have used to manage the negative risk both personally and professionally.
    5. Evaluate the advice Kate received from her coworkers.
    6. Referring to the conflict resolution strategies taught in this course, determine which one is best suited to resolve Kate’s conflict. Justify your position.
    7. In the chart below, evaluate your conflict resolution skills from the past five years. Rate yourself on a scale from 1–5, where 1 represents low performing and 5 represents high performing.

 

Conflict Resolution Approach

Rate Yourself (1–5)

  • Preventing the conflict

  • Suppressing the conflict

  • Avoiding the conflict

  • Using false emotions for distracting the conflict

  • Eliminating the conflict

  • Accepting the conflict

  • Recognizing the value of the conflict

  • Encouraging interpersonal criticism

  • Managing the conflict

 

  1. Select one conflict resolution approach in which you ranked the lowest and develop an individual improvement plan for that approach.
  2. Explain how the mediation process could strengthen your conflict resolution and management skills.
  3. Discuss how the arbitration process could strengthen your conflict resolution and management skills.
  4. Implement some portion of your plan. Provide a detailed summary of the changes that occurred in your development as it relates to your ability to handle conflict.

Write an 8–10-page report in Word format. Utilize at least four scholarly sources (in addition to your textbook) to complete your research, referencing them within the text and at the end in a reference list. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A2.doc.

Make sure you write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship through accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Discuss how the arbitration process could strengthen your conflict resolution and management skills.

The workplace can be an especially stressful environment. Personal conflicts between coworkers, fear of layoffs, and heavy workloads can be causes of negative stress. This stress can be carried to our homes and after-work activities, impacting personal health. Allowing these stressors to build and intensify will only further impair the work environment. For this assignment, you are required to review a scenario regarding a woman (Kate) who has experienced negative stress stemming from her work environment. Then, you will compare your own conflict management skills and experiences against Kate’s experiences. Follow the directions below to write an 8–10-page report on conflict management.

Review the following scenario:

Kate has been employed by a well-known manufacturing company for 12 years. She is the only female on her line and the fastest worker. She has been promoted several times through mergers and acquisitions, but has always been looked over for a senior management position. Kate believes she is qualified for advancement but thinks her manager has a problem with her personally. To top it off, Kate did not receive a semiannual or annual review, which would have resulted in a raise. Her coworkers (all males) have urged her to go to management and report what she believes to be discriminatory behavior from her immediate manager.

Now, complete the following tasks:

    1. Discuss a situation you have been in where you felt you were passed over for a promotion, made to feel indifferent, or were discriminated against. Compare and contrast your story with Kate’s.
    2. Compare the possible ethical breaches of Kate’s manager against your own manager’s behavior. Utilize scholarly research on leadership theory as justification.
    3. Compare the possible legal breaches of Kate’s manager against your own manager’s behavior. Utilize scholarly research on leadership theory as justification.
    4. Recommend an approach Kate could have used to manage the negative risk both personally and professionally.
    5. Evaluate the advice Kate received from her coworkers.
    6. Referring to the conflict resolution strategies taught in this course, determine which one is best suited to resolve Kate’s conflict. Justify your position.
    7. In the chart below, evaluate your conflict resolution skills from the past five years. Rate yourself on a scale from 1–5, where 1 represents low performing and 5 represents high performing.

 

Conflict Resolution Approach

Rate Yourself (1–5)

  • Preventing the conflict

  • Suppressing the conflict

  • Avoiding the conflict

  • Using false emotions for distracting the conflict

  • Eliminating the conflict

  • Accepting the conflict

  • Recognizing the value of the conflict

  • Encouraging interpersonal criticism

  • Managing the conflict

 

  1. Select one conflict resolution approach in which you ranked the lowest and develop an individual improvement plan for that approach.
  2. Explain how the mediation process could strengthen your conflict resolution and management skills.
  3. Discuss how the arbitration process could strengthen your conflict resolution and management skills.
  4. Implement some portion of your plan. Provide a detailed summary of the changes that occurred in your development as it relates to your ability to handle conflict.

Write an 8–10-page report in Word format. Utilize at least four scholarly sources (in addition to your textbook) to complete your research, referencing them within the text and at the end in a reference list. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A2.doc.

Make sure you write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship through accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Discuss a situation you have been in where you felt you were passed over for a promotion, made to feel indifferent, or were discriminated against.

The workplace can be an especially stressful environment. Personal conflicts between coworkers, fear of layoffs, and heavy workloads can be causes of negative stress. This stress can be carried to our homes and after-work activities, impacting personal health. Allowing these stressors to build and intensify will only further impair the work environment. For this assignment, you are required to review a scenario regarding a woman (Kate) who has experienced negative stress stemming from her work environment. Then, you will compare your own conflict management skills and experiences against Kate’s experiences. Follow the directions below to write an 8–10-page report on conflict management.

Review the following scenario:

Kate has been employed by a well-known manufacturing company for 12 years. She is the only female on her line and the fastest worker. She has been promoted several times through mergers and acquisitions, but has always been looked over for a senior management position. Kate believes she is qualified for advancement but thinks her manager has a problem with her personally. To top it off, Kate did not receive a semiannual or annual review, which would have resulted in a raise. Her coworkers (all males) have urged her to go to management and report what she believes to be discriminatory behavior from her immediate manager.

Now, complete the following tasks:

    1. Discuss a situation you have been in where you felt you were passed over for a promotion, made to feel indifferent, or were discriminated against. Compare and contrast your story with Kate’s.
    2. Compare the possible ethical breaches of Kate’s manager against your own manager’s behavior. Utilize scholarly research on leadership theory as justification.
    3. Compare the possible legal breaches of Kate’s manager against your own manager’s behavior. Utilize scholarly research on leadership theory as justification.
    4. Recommend an approach Kate could have used to manage the negative risk both personally and professionally.
    5. Evaluate the advice Kate received from her coworkers.
    6. Referring to the conflict resolution strategies taught in this course, determine which one is best suited to resolve Kate’s conflict. Justify your position.
    7. In the chart below, evaluate your conflict resolution skills from the past five years. Rate yourself on a scale from 1–5, where 1 represents low performing and 5 represents high performing.

 

Conflict Resolution Approach

Rate Yourself (1–5)

  • Preventing the conflict

  • Suppressing the conflict

  • Avoiding the conflict

  • Using false emotions for distracting the conflict

  • Eliminating the conflict

  • Accepting the conflict

  • Recognizing the value of the conflict

  • Encouraging interpersonal criticism

  • Managing the conflict

 

  1. Select one conflict resolution approach in which you ranked the lowest and develop an individual improvement plan for that approach.
  2. Explain how the mediation process could strengthen your conflict resolution and management skills.
  3. Discuss how the arbitration process could strengthen your conflict resolution and management skills.
  4. Implement some portion of your plan. Provide a detailed summary of the changes that occurred in your development as it relates to your ability to handle conflict.

Write an 8–10-page report in Word format. Utilize at least four scholarly sources (in addition to your textbook) to complete your research, referencing them within the text and at the end in a reference list. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A2.doc.

Make sure you write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship through accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Identify the source (writer and title of essay) and state his or her most important point in your own words.

Hello Prof, May I have these teo DQ and Assignment back o Tuesday please willing to pay 20 for all thank you have a awesome weekend.

 

ENG115 DQ

Assume that you are a tutor of entering Freshmen who are struggling with how to write research papers and making decisions about when to paraphrase and when to quote. Explain two guidelines they should follow. And, using the essay you selected to summarize, provide an example of an acceptable paraphrase and an unacceptable paraphrase.

 

ENG Assignment Week 2

Assignment 1: Summary and Personal Response 

Due Week 2 and worth 120 points

Select one essay in The brief McGraw-Hill guide: Writing for college, writing for life: (2nd ed.) to summarize for this assignment. Choose from the following essays:  “Se habla Espanol” by Barrientos; “Facing poverty with a rich girl’s habits” by Kim; “On becoming a writer” by Baker; “Farm girl” by Hemauer

Write a one and one-half to two (1½ – 2) page summary paper in which you:

  1. Identify the source (writer and title of essay) and state his or her most important point in your own words.
  2. Summarize the other main points and their supporting details in separate paragraphs.
  3. Discuss the (1) writer’s purpose, (2) genre, (3) audience, and (4) tone (attitude),
  4. Describe your emotional response to the essay.
  5. Use quotations, paraphrase, and summary correctly.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Recognize how to use quotations, paraphrase, and summary in the writing process.
  • Apply the writing process to develop various writing genres.
  • Write clearly and concisely about selected topics using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills,

 

MAT DQ

 

Let’s Talk About Math – How much did your brain grow in the first week?

If we could see before and after scans of your brain, we would already be able to identify areas of growth and increased brain activity after just one week in this class. Watch this video to see how the brain grows when you are learning something new:

So, now that you have completed your first week, and grown your brain, what was your biggest challenge, and how did you overcome it? What would you tell students who don’t think that they have a math brain about how you were able to train your brain to be successful?

Describe the benefits of flawless consultation then explain the basic value of the term, “flawless consultation.”

Flawless Consulting and a Sensible Oxymoron” Please discuss the following:

  • Describe the benefits of flawless consultation then explain the basic value of the term, “flawless consultation.”
  • After reading the Sensible Oxymoron listed in the “Readings” section, replace the word, “oxymoron” with a word that is as descriptive of the consulting relationship, and indicate why you selected that word and how it relates to the consulting role.

“Trust and Accountability” Please discuss the following:

  • Trust has been identified as a major consideration when choosing a consultant to improve business processes. Create a persuasive argument to convince a potential client that you are trustworthy and can deliver results.
  • Accountability is also important in the consulting relationship. Recommend a strategy that you could employ in a consulting relationship that demonstrates you are accountable for

Analyzing the website to determine if it provides useful information for the public (doing the public good) or if its purpose is to advertise a government program or service (doing well for government).

Resources: Electronic Reserve Readings, the Internet, or other resources

Locate a government website.

Prepare a 700- to 1,050-word paper analyzing the website to determine if it provides useful information for the public (doing the public good) or if its purpose is to advertise a government program or service (doing well for government).

Justify your analysis using specific examples from the website.

Attach a screenshot of the website’s home page to your paper.

Prepare to present your analysis in class.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.

Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.

Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part I

Prewriting

Due Week 2 and worth 30 points

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an opposing view on an issue.

The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.

In Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” at http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf. Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.

Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas.

Part I – Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity.  Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue.

2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con section – whichever section opposes your position.

3.For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these “believing” questions suggested by Elbow:

  1. What’s interesting or helpful about this view?
  2. What would I notice if I believed this view?
  3. In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

    • Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
    • Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
    • Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

    • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    • Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.
    • Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
    • Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.

Click here to view the grading rubric..

Grading for this assignment will be based on quality, logic / organization, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 30 Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Prewriting
Criteria  

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1.Select one (1) of the approved topics fromthe www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely selectedone (1) of the approved topics fromthe www.procon.org Website; did not submit or incompletely stated your position on the issue. Insufficiently selectedone (1) of the approved topics fromthe www.procon.org Website; insufficiently stated your position on the issue. Partially selectedone (1) of the approved topics fromthe www.procon.org Website; partially stated your position on the issue. Satisfactorily selectedone (1) of the approved topics fromthe www.procon.org Website; satisfactorily stated your position on the issue. Thoroughly selectedone (1) of the approved topics fromthe www.procon.org Website; thoroughly stated your position on the issue.
2. Identify three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org.

Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section  from procon.org. Insufficiently identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section from procon.org. Partially identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section  from procon.org. Satisfactorily identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section under “Con” from procon.org. Thoroughly identified three (3) premises under either the “Pro” or “Con” section “from procon.org.
3. Provide answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.

Weight: 40%

Did not submit or incompletely provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. Insufficiently provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. Partially provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. Satisfactorily provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position. Thoroughly provided answers to the “believing questions” for the three (3) premises that disagree with your own position.
4. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. Follow APA Style format.

Weight: 10%

Did not complete the assignment or had more than 9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling. Had 8-9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling. Had 6-7 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling. Had 4-5 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics,