Author: chris

Hi,  I am working on a paper and need three additional elements;

 

1) PepsiCo’s relationship with its bottlers- the firm produces the bulk concentrate and sells it to the bottlers for production.  Pepsi also owns some of its own plants as well.

 

2) Specific costs of production profitability and output decision related to Pepsi from Annual report (attached).

 

3) Overall market share; Discusses the market share of the firm and its top competitors by providing details on current percentages for each firm and describing the trend over time.

 

Please answer the three questions fully above. It does not have to be in APA format; I will reformat it when I incorporate into my paper.  I have attached PepsiCo’s Annual report and my draft paper for your reference.

ssignment 1: Foundations of the Development and Functions of Police, Draft

Due Week 4 and worth 200 points

To understand contemporary policing in America, it is essential to understand the history by looking at the past eras. The police have day-to-day practices influenced by deeply ingrained traditions.  It’s also necessary to comprehend how an officer’s career begins, from the academy to the street. The effective partnership between the police and the community must also be understood to better appreciate the development and functions of police.

Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper in which you:

1. Compare and contrast the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.
2. Identify the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and explain the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.
3. Provide your own definition of community-policing and explain the difference between community policing and traditional policing.
4. Critically examine the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.
5. Determine the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Provide a rationale for your response.
6. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Trace the development of law enforcement organizations and police operations in America.
• Illustrate the nature of police work and describe the training and management of police officers.
• Analyze the development of community-oriented policing and describe its impact on communities today.
• Describe the nature and purpose of criminal investigation, including some investigative techniques.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in law enforcement operations and management.
• Write clearly and concisely about law enforcement operations and management using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.

Points: 200	Assignment 1: Foundations of the Development and Functions of Police, Draft
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Compare and contrast the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Insufficiently compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Partially compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Thoroughly compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.
2. Identify the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and explain the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and did not submit or incompletely explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Insufficiently Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and insufficiently explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Partially Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and partially explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Satisfactorily Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and satisfactorily explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Thoroughly Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and thoroughly explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.
3. Provide your own definition of community-policing and explain the difference between community policing and traditional policing. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely provided your own definition of community-policing and did not submit or incompletely explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Insufficiently provided your own definition of community-policing and insufficiently explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Partially provided your own definition of community-policing and partially explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Satisfactorily provided your own definition of community-policing and satisfactorily explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Thoroughly provided your own definition of community-policing and thoroughly explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.
4. Critically examine the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Insufficiently examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Partially examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Satisfactorily examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Thoroughly examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.
5.  Determine the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Provide a rationale for your response.. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.	Insufficiently incompletely determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.	Partially determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Partially provided a rationale for your response.	Satisfactorily determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.	Thoroughly determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.
6. 4 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors pre

Due Week 4 and worth 140 points

According to the text, crime has been part of the human condition since people began to live in groups. Ancient documents indicate that conduct we now call murder, theft, or robbery was identified as criminal by civilizations that existed thousands of years ago. Criminal laws regulate human conduct and tell people what they can and cannot do and, in some instances, what they must do under certain circumstances. In this assignment, you will explore different types of criminal conduct and the goals of criminal law.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

1. Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position.
2. Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Next, support or criticize the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.
3. Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Provide a rationale to support your response.
4. Identify the four (4) goals of criminal law, and discuss the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.
5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar type Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Describe the nature and history of American criminal law.
• Explain the role of individuals and federal, state, and local government agencies in crime fighting and prosecution of criminal offenses.
• Analyze the essential legal elements of criminal conduct.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in criminal law.
• Write clearly and concisely about criminal law using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

 

Points: 140	Assignment 1: Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your position.	Insufficiently determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your position.	Partially determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Partially provided a rationale to support your position.	Satisfactorily determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your position.	Thoroughly determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your position.
2. Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Next, support or criticize the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Did not submit or incompletely supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Insufficiently explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Insufficiently supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Partially explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Partially supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Satisfactorily explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Satisfactorily supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Thoroughly explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Thoroughly supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.
3. Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Provide a rationale to support your response. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.	Insufficiently argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.	Partially argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.	Satisfactorily argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.	Thoroughly argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.
4. Identify the four (4) goals of criminal law, and discuss the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, did not submit or incompletely discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Insufficiently identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, insufficiently discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Partially identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, partially discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Satisfactorily identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, satisfactorily discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Thoroughly identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, thoroughly discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.
5. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2

ssignment 1: Foundations of the Development and Functions of Police, Draft

Due Week 4 and worth 200 points

To understand contemporary policing in America, it is essential to understand the history by looking at the past eras. The police have day-to-day practices influenced by deeply ingrained traditions.  It’s also necessary to comprehend how an officer’s career begins, from the academy to the street. The effective partnership between the police and the community must also be understood to better appreciate the development and functions of police.

Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper in which you:

1. Compare and contrast the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.
2. Identify the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and explain the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.
3. Provide your own definition of community-policing and explain the difference between community policing and traditional policing.
4. Critically examine the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.
5. Determine the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Provide a rationale for your response.
6. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Trace the development of law enforcement organizations and police operations in America.
• Illustrate the nature of police work and describe the training and management of police officers.
• Analyze the development of community-oriented policing and describe its impact on communities today.
• Describe the nature and purpose of criminal investigation, including some investigative techniques.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in law enforcement operations and management.
• Write clearly and concisely about law enforcement operations and management using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.

Points: 200	Assignment 1: Foundations of the Development and Functions of Police, Draft
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Compare and contrast the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Insufficiently compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Partially compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Thoroughly compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.
2. Identify the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and explain the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and did not submit or incompletely explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Insufficiently Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and insufficiently explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Partially Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and partially explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Satisfactorily Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and satisfactorily explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Thoroughly Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and thoroughly explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.
3. Provide your own definition of community-policing and explain the difference between community policing and traditional policing. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely provided your own definition of community-policing and did not submit or incompletely explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Insufficiently provided your own definition of community-policing and insufficiently explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Partially provided your own definition of community-policing and partially explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Satisfactorily provided your own definition of community-policing and satisfactorily explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Thoroughly provided your own definition of community-policing and thoroughly explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.
4. Critically examine the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Insufficiently examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Partially examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Satisfactorily examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Thoroughly examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.
5.  Determine the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Provide a rationale for your response.. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.	Insufficiently incompletely determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.	Partially determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Partially provided a rationale for your response.	Satisfactorily determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.	Thoroughly determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.
6. 4 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors pre

ssignment 1: Foundations of the Development and Functions of Police, Draft

Due Week 4 and worth 200 points

To understand contemporary policing in America, it is essential to understand the history by looking at the past eras. The police have day-to-day practices influenced by deeply ingrained traditions.  It’s also necessary to comprehend how an officer’s career begins, from the academy to the street. The effective partnership between the police and the community must also be understood to better appreciate the development and functions of police.

Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper in which you:

1. Compare and contrast the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.
2. Identify the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and explain the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.
3. Provide your own definition of community-policing and explain the difference between community policing and traditional policing.
4. Critically examine the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.
5. Determine the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Provide a rationale for your response.
6. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Trace the development of law enforcement organizations and police operations in America.
• Illustrate the nature of police work and describe the training and management of police officers.
• Analyze the development of community-oriented policing and describe its impact on communities today.
• Describe the nature and purpose of criminal investigation, including some investigative techniques.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in law enforcement operations and management.
• Write clearly and concisely about law enforcement operations and management using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.

Points: 200	Assignment 1: Foundations of the Development and Functions of Police, Draft
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Compare and contrast the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Insufficiently compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Partially compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.	Thoroughly compared and contrasted the major characteristics of the political and reform eras of policing.
2. Identify the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and explain the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and did not submit or incompletely explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Insufficiently Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and insufficiently explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Partially Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and partially explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Satisfactorily Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and satisfactorily explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.	Thoroughly Identified the skills and knowledge that are imparted to police trainees during their academy training and thoroughly explained the importance of these skills in relation to real world applications.
3. Provide your own definition of community-policing and explain the difference between community policing and traditional policing. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely provided your own definition of community-policing and did not submit or incompletely explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Insufficiently provided your own definition of community-policing and insufficiently explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Partially provided your own definition of community-policing and partially explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Satisfactorily provided your own definition of community-policing and satisfactorily explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.	Thoroughly provided your own definition of community-policing and thoroughly explained the difference between community policing and traditional policing.
4. Critically examine the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Insufficiently examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Partially examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Satisfactorily examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.	Thoroughly examined critically the important elements of implementation and evaluation phases of community policing and problem solving.
5.  Determine the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Provide a rationale for your response.. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.	Insufficiently incompletely determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.	Partially determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Partially provided a rationale for your response.	Satisfactorily determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.	Thoroughly determined the top five (5) qualities that detectives and undercover officers need to possess (one [1] being the most important). Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.
6. 4 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors pre

Due Week 4 and worth 140 points

According to the text, crime has been part of the human condition since people began to live in groups. Ancient documents indicate that conduct we now call murder, theft, or robbery was identified as criminal by civilizations that existed thousands of years ago. Criminal laws regulate human conduct and tell people what they can and cannot do and, in some instances, what they must do under certain circumstances. In this assignment, you will explore different types of criminal conduct and the goals of criminal law.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

1. Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position.
2. Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Next, support or criticize the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.
3. Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Provide a rationale to support your response.
4. Identify the four (4) goals of criminal law, and discuss the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.
5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar type Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Describe the nature and history of American criminal law.
• Explain the role of individuals and federal, state, and local government agencies in crime fighting and prosecution of criminal offenses.
• Analyze the essential legal elements of criminal conduct.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in criminal law.
• Write clearly and concisely about criminal law using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

 

Points: 140	Assignment 1: Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your position.	Insufficiently determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your position.	Partially determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Partially provided a rationale to support your position.	Satisfactorily determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your position.	Thoroughly determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your position.
2. Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Next, support or criticize the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Did not submit or incompletely supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Insufficiently explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Insufficiently supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Partially explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Partially supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Satisfactorily explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Satisfactorily supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Thoroughly explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Thoroughly supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.
3. Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Provide a rationale to support your response. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.	Insufficiently argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.	Partially argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.	Satisfactorily argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.	Thoroughly argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.
4. Identify the four (4) goals of criminal law, and discuss the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, did not submit or incompletely discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Insufficiently identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, insufficiently discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Partially identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, partially discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Satisfactorily identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, satisfactorily discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Thoroughly identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, thoroughly discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.
5. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2

Due Week 4 and worth 140 points

According to the text, crime has been part of the human condition since people began to live in groups. Ancient documents indicate that conduct we now call murder, theft, or robbery was identified as criminal by civilizations that existed thousands of years ago. Criminal laws regulate human conduct and tell people what they can and cannot do and, in some instances, what they must do under certain circumstances. In this assignment, you will explore different types of criminal conduct and the goals of criminal law.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

1. Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position.
2. Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Next, support or criticize the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.
3. Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Provide a rationale to support your response.
4. Identify the four (4) goals of criminal law, and discuss the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.
5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar type Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Describe the nature and history of American criminal law.
• Explain the role of individuals and federal, state, and local government agencies in crime fighting and prosecution of criminal offenses.
• Analyze the essential legal elements of criminal conduct.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in criminal law.
• Write clearly and concisely about criminal law using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

 

Points: 140	Assignment 1: Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your position.	Insufficiently determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your position.	Partially determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Partially provided a rationale to support your position.	Satisfactorily determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your position.	Thoroughly determined whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your position.
2. Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Next, support or criticize the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Did not submit or incompletely supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Insufficiently explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Insufficiently supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Partially explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Partially supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Satisfactorily explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Satisfactorily supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.	Thoroughly explained the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Thoroughly supported or criticized the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.
3. Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Provide a rationale to support your response. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.	Insufficiently argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.	Partially argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.	Satisfactorily argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.	Thoroughly argued for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.
4. Identify the four (4) goals of criminal law, and discuss the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons. Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, did not submit or incompletely discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Insufficiently identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, insufficiently discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Partially identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, partially discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Satisfactorily identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, satisfactorily discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.	Thoroughly identified the four (4) goals of criminal law, thoroughly discussed the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.
5. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2

Using the previously created lesson plan, choose three technology sources that can be utilized to make the lesson more effective. Additionally, include how you would conduct a formative assessment to evaluate learning based on the effectiveness of the assistive technology device.

Complete the Formative Assessment and Instructional Materials, Equipment and Technology sections of your Collaborative Lesson Plan.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar

No word count but need.  MLA citations

 

 

Discussion #1: Based on the Case Study “Burger King.” Case 18, starting on page 18-1, complete the following requirements:

o    Utilizing the Week 1 Addendum, identify Burger King’s resources, capabilities, and core competencies

o    Provide three findings of fact. Not required to provide recommendations and justifications for these findings of fact.

BUAD 620 Midterm Exam

Winter 2016

 

All Students must complete four of the seven questions.  Each question is worth 25 points;  three and no more than four typed pages for each question;  1 ½ inch spacing, 11 pt font Times Roman;  1’’ margins.  (Please note a page is a full page of information. One sentence on a third page does not make it three pages) Please do not define, assume I know the definitions, focus on taking positions and using the theory and concepts presented in class in defending your position.

 

1. Explain the dynamics of the classic Olympic System presented in Chaplet book and discuss the impact of the Extended Olympic System on the creation of the current Regulated Olympic System.

 

2. Provide examples of where the IOC practices each of its governing principles as presented in the PP slides and provide two examples where it can be argued that IOC actions contradict them.
3. From reading the Foer Book please compare and contrast the impact globalization has had on the English soccer culture and the Brazilian soccer culture. Take a position on whether the forces of Globalization have been positive or negative on these countries and specifically the soccer culture/environment/industry in those countries.
4. Using Hofstede cultural variables as a theoretical basis, as well as the three competing theories on leading in a different culture that were presented in the Culture and Globalization power point presentation tell me the approach you would take if you as an American was hired to run/lead a sport organization as either a coach of its professional soccer club or director of business operations for that club in a country that differs from the US in the majority of the Hofstede variables. Basically communicate the difference and tell me how you will deal with the difference or the similarities.
5. You are the general manager of the Philadelphia 76ers and your top scout recommends to you that the best player available to draft is from a foreign country (you choose but a country vastly different than the US, (eg. Developing, Muslim, low population and GDP and Hofstede variables).Please tell me the process you would take to try to ensure the success of this athlete with your team.  Be sure to include information related to the sport migrant experience and an understanding of the type of migrant athletes.
6. You are in a position within either an International Federation (e.g. FIBA, FIFA, etc) or a national Olympic Committee (e.g. USOC, your country)Based on your belief on what the true purpose or meaning of the Olympic games and the Olympic movement are,  and the purpose and the charge of the commission, tell me on which three IOC Commissions  you would like to serve and why and which one commission upon which you would not like to serve.
7. Using the Global Sport Figuration as your theoretical base explain the evolution of the NBA into its current state as a Multinational Sport Enterprise as presented in the Burton, Robinson and Turam article that was shared with you for the firs class and whether or not it has been a good or negative evolution.

 

 

Grading Rubric

Each response will be evaluated based upon the following rubric and criteria.

Ability to answer the question that was asked.  5

Use and understanding of appropriate Course Material, theory concepts and references to support and strengthen position or response.  Use and cite sources. 5

Depth of the response/strength of argument for position taken.  5

Written communication and organization of response.  5

Overall quality of the response based on ability to demonstrate and appreciation for materials and concepts presented in first half of the semester.  5