Examines the network design of the selected business and explains the effectiveness and efficiency of the design. Minor details are missing or unclear.

elect a business that you believe has a good communication network. Examine its network design and explain why you think the network is effective and efficient. Recommend a better network design which can support the decisions and operations of the business if there is any.

Your paper should be a minimum of three pages long, excluding the title and reference pages, and formatted in APA style. Include a network diagram as reference, and at least more than two scholarly references, in addition to the text.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 

 

Description:

 

Total Possible Score: 12.00

Examines the Network Design of the Selected Business and Explains the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Design

Total: 4.50

Distinguished – Thoroughly examines the network design of the selected business and comprehensively explains the effectiveness and efficiency of the design.

Proficient – Examines the network design of the selected business and explains the effectiveness and efficiency of the design. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Partially examines the network design of the selected business and explains the effectiveness and efficiency of the design. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to examine the network design of the selected business and explain the effectiveness and efficiency of the design; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The examination of the network design and the explanation of the effectiveness and efficiency are either non-existent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Recommends a Network Design Which Supports the Decisions and Operations of the Selected Company

Total: 4.50

Distinguished – Comprehensively and clearly recommends a network design which supports the decisions and operation of the selected company.

Proficient – Recommends a network design which supports the decisions and operations of the selected company. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Partially recommends a network design which supports the decisions and operation of the selected  company. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to recommend network design which supports the decisions and operation of the selected  company; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The recommendation for a network design which supports the decisions and operation of the selected company is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

 

Reading: Comprehension

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Distinguishes probable implications of the text for contexts, perspectives, or issues outside the assigned task or beyond the author’s explicit message.

Proficient – Uses the text and/or specific knowledge of the author’s context to draw more intricate inferences about the author’s message and approach.

Basic – Considers how textual features (e.g., sentence and paragraph structure or tone) contribute to the author’s message. Draws fundamental inferences about context and rationale of text.

Below Expectations – Inadequately captures vocabulary but makes an effort to paraphrase or summarize the information the text communicates.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Integrative Learning: Integrated Communication

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Utilizes a format, language, or graph (or other visual representation) in ways that enhance comprehension, while making clear the interdependence of language and meaning, thought, and expression.

Proficient – Utilizes a format, language, or graph (or other visual representation) to correlate content and form, demonstrating an awareness of purpose and audience.

Basic – Utilizes a format, language, or graph (or other visual representation) that correlates what is being communicated.

Below Expectations – Utilizes a format, language, or graph (or other visual representation) that is appropriate, but may be incomplete or contain inaccuracies.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

 

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Explain what would be the ethical course of action and the legal requirements for action in the case.

In each case, answer the questions at the end of the case and give researched references to support your assertions; also, explain what would be the ethical course of action and the legal requirements for action in the case.

Case One

Mrs. G. has an aneurysm in her brain that, if untreated by surgery, will lead to blindness and probably death. The surgery recommended leads to death in 75% of all cases. Of those who survive the operation, nearly 75% are crippled. Mrs. G has three small children. Her husband has a modest job, and his health insurance will cover the operation, but not the expenses that will result if she is crippled.

When informed of this, Mrs. G. is in great emotional turmoil for a week or so until she makes her decision. She refuses treatment, because she does not like the odds. There was, after all, only a one chance out of sixteen for a real recovery. In addition, she could not come to grips with exposing her family to the risk of having a mother who would be a burden and not a help.

Can a patient with serious obligations, such as a family, refuse treatment? What odds of recovery would be good odds?

Case Two

Mrs. S., an 85-year-old housewife, becomes aware of breathlessness and is easily fatigued. She is known to have had a heart murmur for 2 years. She consents to come to a research hospital for cardiac catheterization, which confirms the presence of severe, calcific aortic stenosis with secondary congestive heart failure.

Because of the unfavorable prospect for survival without surgical intervention, the recommendation at the combined cardiac medical-surgical conference is for an operation. The physician explains the situation to Mr. and Mrs. S. and recommends aortic valve replacement. It is noted that the risk of surgery is not well known for Mrs. S,’s age group, and that early mortality is usually around 10 percent, with 80 percent achieving good functional results after 3 years. Her lack of an obvious disease makes her a relatively good candidate for a successful surgical outcome, despite her age.

Mrs. S. appears to understand the discussion and recommendation, but requests deferral of the decision and shows signs of denial of the problem. She has no other medical problems, her husband is in good health, and their marriage appears to be happy. They are financially secure and enjoy a full set of social and recreational activities. She returns on three subsequent occasions for simple, supportive attention. The physician decides not to employ psychiatric assistance or other measures to reduce her denial and begins to use conversation to reduce her anxiety associated with her decision.

Discuss some of the reasons why a claim may be rejected.

here are several steps to take when submitting a claim form to the insurance company for reimbursement. The result of a clean claim is proper reimbursement for the services the facility has provided.

In this assignment, you will be addressing the claims submission process and the follow-up.

Include the following in your submission:

  • List all of the information that is important before the claim can be submitted.
  • Discuss some of the reasons why a claim may be rejected.
  • What steps should be taken to check the claim status?

Compare and contrast the major strengths and weaknesses of analytic and nonanalytic forecasting.

  • Compare and contrast the major strengths and weaknesses of analytic and nonanalytic forecasting. Provide one (1) example of each method being used in a real-world scenario to support your answer.
  • Discuss the importance of the four (4) guiding principles of forecasting. Next, select one (1) principle and discuss how to apply it in a real world scenario.

Compare and contrast the three (3) models of culture. Next, select one (1) of the researched international competitors, and ascertain the model of culture that is most appropriate for the selected international competitor.

Select one (1) global industry, such as the automobile or cell phone industry. Next, use the Internet to research three (3) major international competitors within the chosen industry. Take note of manner in which the popular international business press (e.g., newspapers, magazines, e-zines, press releases, etc.) depicts the selected companies.

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Compare and contrast the three (3) models of culture. Next, select one (1) of the researched international competitors, and ascertain the model of culture that is most appropriate for the selected international competitor. Provide a rationale for your response.
  2. Recommend the type of economic system that best relates to each of the researched international competitors. Predict three (3) potential effects of such an economic system on the societies in which the system is involved. Provide a rationale for your response.
  3. Speculate on the major reasons why certain countries have lagged behind other countries in economic development. Recommend three (3) generic actions that the three (3) researched major competitors could take in order to encourage economic progress within these countries. Provide a rationale for your response.
  4. Imagine that you have been given the opportunity to lead one (1) of the three (3) researched international competitors. Select one (1) company in which you are interested in leading, and provide a rationale for your choice. Propose the necessary major steps—including education, social development, community activities, bargaining skills, language skills, conflict management skills, etc.—that you would need to take in order to propel you from where you are today to a global leadership / management position at your chosen company.
  5. Suggest two (2) global changes in expansion, technology, marketing, products, services, human resources, and customer service, etc., that you would make as CEO of the selected international organization from Question 4. Provide a rationale for your response.
  6. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Analyze interdepartmental communication that would be necessary for continued engagement in the proposed initiative.

opic: PATIENT DATA PRIVACY

Performance Improvement plan: Proper and Intense training of employees

 

 

Success of the Performance Improvement Plan

 

 

A. If this initiative is successful, what would be the financial implications for the healthcare organization?

B. How would the existing information management systems contribute to the success of your proposal?

C. What organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative, if it is successful?

D. Analyze interdepartmental communication that would be necessary for continued engagement in the proposed initiative.

 

1.5-2 pages. APA format with references please

Demonstrate critical thinking by accurately interpreting the evidence (scholarly sources) provided.

Review the Global Education and Global Citizenship video and read the article “A Model of Global Citizenship: Antecedents and Outcomes” by Stephen Reysen and Iva Katzarska-Miller. Please take some time to reflect on how the concept of global citizenship has shaped your identity and respond to the following prompts:

  • Based on the video, explain the importance of educating others on global citizenship.
  • Address each of the following outcomes of global citizenship as they pertain to the development of your own identity: intergroup empathy, valuing diversity, social justice, environmental sustainability, intergroup helping, and the level of responsibility to act for the betterment of this world (found in the article). Explain how your environment influences these outcomes.
  • Provide at least two personal examples or events in your life that illustrate the development of global citizenship based on the outcomes.
  • Analyze how your general education courses influenced you to become a global citizen.
  • Demonstrate critical thinking by accurately interpreting the evidence (scholarly sources) provided.

Your paper

  • Must be at least 750 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must cite at least the two sources used for this assignment.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford

Distinguish the role of each actor in the adversarial systems, and determine whether or not each actor brings a bias to the prosecution of a case.

  • Analyze the key roles of the actors in the U.S. adversary system. Distinguish the role of each actor in the adversarial systems, and determine whether or not each actor brings a bias to the prosecution of a case. Provide a rationale for your response.
  • Take a position as to whether or not you believe that “the grand jury is not an adversarial hearing” as described in this week’s reading. Support your position with a discussion on the difference between a trial hearing and a grand jury hearing, as well as on their respective merits and demerits.

Determine the category of computer crimes or cyber terrorism that presents the greatest overall threat at the present time.

APA FORMAT IS A MUST……………The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Explain the four (4) major categories of computer crimes, and provide at least one (1) example for each.
  2. Explain the most common forms of digital crime.
  3. Determine the category of computer crimes or cyber terrorism that presents the greatest overall threat at the present time. Provide a rationale to support your response.
  4. Summarize the roles and responses that the U.S. government, court systems, and law enforcement agencies in combatting computer crime. Next, suggest one (1) additional way—i.e., one not discussed in the textbook—that the law enforcement agencies can better counteract computer crime.
  5. Use at least three (3) quality references for this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
  6. Subject: Digital Computer Crime

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Explain digital crime and digital terrorism activities.
  • Describe law enforcement roles and responses.
  • Identify information system attacks and countermeasures.
  • Describe the criminology of computer crime.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in information technology in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about information technology in criminal justice topics using proper