Differentiate between high- and low-performance organizations and identify contributing factors.

Due Week 4 and worth 150 points

Employee turnover in the hospitality industry averages 400% annually. This means that, on average, 100% of the staff of a restaurant, hotel, airline, cruise ship, etc. is replaced four (4) times per year. There has been extensive research on employee turnover and employee job satisfaction. Using the Internet or the Strayer Library, select one (1) hospitality industry type such as fast-food restaurants, luxury hotels, specialty hotels, or any other type of hospitality interest and identify the main problems associated with that industry and employee turnover. Suggest ways and methods to address the high turnover rate.

Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:

  1. Describe the type of hospitality industry and its main categories of employees.
  2. Summarize three (3) primary reasons that turnover is so high in this industry.
  3. Recommend one (1) method to address each of the three (3) primary reasons that turnover is so high in this industry.
  4. Recommend one (1) method to improve job satisfaction in general for this industry.
  5. Use at least two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Develop a plan for managing and improving quality in a hospitality operation.
  • Describe the management attributes contributing to providing service quality.
  • List and describe basic service paradigms.
  • Differentiate between high- and low-performance organizations and identify contributing factors.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in quality service assurance.
  • Write clearly and concisely about quality service assurance using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, a

Compare two (2) job positions from the episode and perform a job analysis of each position.

Due Week 4 and worth 100 points

 

Go to YouTube, located at http://www.youtube.com/, and search for an episode of “UnderCover Boss”. Imagine you are the CEO of the company in the selected episode.
Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:
  1. Compare two (2) job positions from the episode and perform a job analysis of each position.
  2. Describe your method of collecting the information for the job analysis (i.e., one-on-one, interview, survey, etc.).
  3. Create a job description from the job analysis.
  4. Justify your belief that the job analysis and job description are in compliance with state and federal regulations.
  5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
  • Formulate HRM strategies and policies to recruit, select, place, and retain the most efficient and effective workforce.
  • Develop effective talent management strategies to recruit and select employees.
  • Design processes to manage employee performance, retention, and separation.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in strategic human resource development.
  • Write clearly and concisely about strategic human resource development using proper writing mechanics.

Describe the influences of family, culture, and environment and the roles they play.

Below is a list from which you will select one topic for the Week Two assignment, another topic for the Week Three assignment, and a third topic for both the Outline of the Final Paper and the Final Paper.  The topic you select for your Outline of the Final Paper and this Final Paper must be different from the topics you select for the Week Two and Week Three assignments.

The topics include:

  • What do twin and adoption studies tell us about the effects of nature (i.e., genetic influences) and nurture (i.e., environmental influences) on human development? Select at least one of the main domains of human development (physical, cognitive, or social-emotional) for your answer.
  • How much credit or blame do parents deserve for the way we are? Select at least one of the main domains of human development (physical, cognitive, or social-emotional) for your answer.
  • To what extent are the lives of adolescents and young adults shaped by parental and peer influences?
  • Why do we have a need to belong (to affiliate with others)?
  • How do our bodies and minds change from early to late adulthood?
  • What are the factors that affect our well-being as middle aged and older adults?
  • Why are some people attracted to members of their own sex whereas others are attracted to members of the opposite sex?
  • How do memory and intelligence change as we age?
  • Does an infant’s temperament shape his/her cognitive and socio-emotional development?
  • Are babies pre-wired for survival?
  • Are adolescents more likely to engage in risk-taking behavior than older adults?
  • Can physical exercise affect cognitive performance in old age? Consider the time of occurrence of physical exercise (i.e., earlier in life or during old age) in your answer.
  • Are there personality traits related to longevity?
  • Does bilingualism improve brain functioning?
  • Why do students in the United States tend to under-perform in math and science?

Once you have chosen your topic, examine the various theories of human development learned in the course and choose one or two that best assist you in understanding the issues involved in your topic. In your assignment address the following:

  • Identify some of the major domains of human development and how they are impacted.
  • Examine the physical, biological, emotional, cognitive, and/or social factors that are affected.
  • Identify the stages of development that are affected and describe the cultural and historical perspectives of partitioning the lifespan that influence the interpretations of the available data on the topic.
  • Describe the influences of family, culture, and environment and the roles they play.

Be sure to examine the available research in human development before completing this assignment.

Writing the Final Paper

The Final Paper:

  1. Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  2. Must include a title page with the following:
    1. Title of paper
    2. Student’s name
    3. Course name and number
    4. Instructor’s name
    5. Date submitted
  3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
    1. You may use the introduction you developed during the Week Four assignment or a revised version if changes are deemed necessary.
  4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
    1. Conclude with an answer to the selected question. Did the evidence you surveyed answer the question satisfactorily?
    2. Include an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the available evidence.
    3. Illustrate how each source fits specific sections of your Final Paper. The goal is to demonstrate that supporting evidence exists for statements that are made in the paper.
    4. If possible, suggest the course that future research should take if answers to the selected question are deemed less than conclusive.
  6. Must use at least five scholarly sources, all of which must come from the Ashford University Library or Google Scholar.
  7. Must summarize each article including the purpose of the investigation, its methodology, and results.
    1. Rely on the brief summaries of the articles (including the purpose of each investigation, its methodology and results) that you developed during Week Four to construct an organized summary of the scientific evidence that answers the question you selected.
    2. If possible, select peer-reviewed articles that summarize the evidence available in a given field of study (e.g., meta-analysis combines the findings of different studies to uncover trends, commonalities and differences).
    3. Order the articles in the way you think you will discuss them in your paper. Then develop a summary of the scientific evidence that answers the question you selected.
    4. You may reference your textbook and other required materials from the course; however, these will not fulfill the resource requirement.
  8. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  9. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
    1. You may use the reference section you developed in the Week Four assignment as the final page of the paper.

Examine the physical, biological, emotional, cognitive, and/or social factors that are affected.

Below is a list from which you will select one topic for the Week Two assignment, another topic for the Week Three assignment, and a third topic for both the Outline of the Final Paper and the Final Paper.  The topic you select for your Outline of the Final Paper and this Final Paper must be different from the topics you select for the Week Two and Week Three assignments.

The topics include:

  • What do twin and adoption studies tell us about the effects of nature (i.e., genetic influences) and nurture (i.e., environmental influences) on human development? Select at least one of the main domains of human development (physical, cognitive, or social-emotional) for your answer.
  • How much credit or blame do parents deserve for the way we are? Select at least one of the main domains of human development (physical, cognitive, or social-emotional) for your answer.
  • To what extent are the lives of adolescents and young adults shaped by parental and peer influences?
  • Why do we have a need to belong (to affiliate with others)?
  • How do our bodies and minds change from early to late adulthood?
  • What are the factors that affect our well-being as middle aged and older adults?
  • Why are some people attracted to members of their own sex whereas others are attracted to members of the opposite sex?
  • How do memory and intelligence change as we age?
  • Does an infant’s temperament shape his/her cognitive and socio-emotional development?
  • Are babies pre-wired for survival?
  • Are adolescents more likely to engage in risk-taking behavior than older adults?
  • Can physical exercise affect cognitive performance in old age? Consider the time of occurrence of physical exercise (i.e., earlier in life or during old age) in your answer.
  • Are there personality traits related to longevity?
  • Does bilingualism improve brain functioning?
  • Why do students in the United States tend to under-perform in math and science?

Once you have chosen your topic, examine the various theories of human development learned in the course and choose one or two that best assist you in understanding the issues involved in your topic. In your assignment address the following:

  • Identify some of the major domains of human development and how they are impacted.
  • Identify the stage
  • Examine the physical, biological, emotional, cognitive, and/or social factors that are affected.
  • s of development that are affected and describe the cultural and historical perspectives of partitioning the lifespan that influence the interpretations of the available data on the topic.
  • Describe the influences of family, culture, and environment and the roles they play.

Be sure to examine the available research in human development before completing this assignment.

Writing the Final Paper

The Final Paper:

  1. Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  2. Must include a title page with the following:
    1. Title of paper
    2. Student’s name
    3. Course name and number
    4. Instructor’s name
    5. Date submitted
  3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
    1. You may use the introduction you developed during the Week Four assignment or a revised version if changes are deemed necessary.
  4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
    1. Conclude with an answer to the selected question. Did the evidence you surveyed answer the question satisfactorily?
    2. Include an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the available evidence.
    3. Illustrate how each source fits specific sections of your Final Paper. The goal is to demonstrate that supporting evidence exists for statements that are made in the paper.
    4. If possible, suggest the course that future research should take if answers to the selected question are deemed less than conclusive.
  6. Must use at least five scholarly sources, all of which must come from the Ashford University Library or Google Scholar.
  7. Must summarize each article including the purpose of the investigation, its methodology, and results.
    1. Rely on the brief summaries of the articles (including the purpose of each investigation, its methodology and results) that you developed during Week Four to construct an organized summary of the scientific evidence that answers the question you selected.
    2. If possible, select peer-reviewed articles that summarize the evidence available in a given field of study (e.g., meta-analysis combines the findings of different studies to uncover trends, commonalities and differences).
    3. Order the articles in the way you think you will discuss them in your paper. Then develop a summary of the scientific evidence that answers the question you selected.
    4. You may reference your textbook and other required materials from the course; however, these will not fulfill the resource requirement.
  8. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  9. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
    1. You may use the reference section you developed in the Week Four assignment as the final page of the paper.

Analyze any questionable legal issues that may arise as a result of this contract.

 

Assemble your Work and Submit for Review

Assemble the work you have completed for the final project from Modules 1 to 3. At this time, you should have started to distill the information from your module-wise research and to organize it into a format suitable for an outline of your guidelines.

Present your outline in a 1–2 page Microsoft Word format document and name the file M4_A1_LastName_CourseProjectTaskIV.doc. Include any links, references, and sources you have used and be sure to follow the proper style for citing legal texts. Submit the document to the Discussion Area by Saturday, January 30, 2016.

By Monday, February 1, 2016, write a one-page review for each outline in a Microsoft Word document. Your review should provide suggestions related to format, resources, best practices, readability, and additional information needed.

By Wednesday, February 3, 2016, submit the reviews to the Discussion Area.

All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

 

 

Assignment 2: Scenario Analysis and Discussion

 

Read the case scenario provided below. Based on the information provided in the case scenario and the readings for this module, prepare a contract that will protect your company.

Scenario

You are the Vice President of Sales for Detroit Mini Safe, a U.S. manufacturer of small fireproof safes with headquarters in Detroit, Michigan. The raw materials used in making the safes are sourced from Japan, Canada, and Saudi Arabia. You have been approached by a group of Chinese buyers who are interested in purchasing a large quantity of your model 1505 mini safes. The Chinese buyers submitted an order consisting of the following pertinent information:

  • Name of Company: Chinese Safe Distributors
  • Address: 35 Taishan Rd, E.D.Z., Jiashan, Zhejiang, China
  • Description of Goods: 5000 Model 1505 mini safes with keypad combination
  • Price: $250.00 each
  • Payment Terms: Open account, payable in U.S. dollars
  • Shipping: Seller to ship the goods by ocean container to Shanghai within 90 days after acceptance of order

The selling price includes the cost of the good, marine insurance, and cost of freight (CIF). Draft a standard contract containing terms and clauses applicable between the parties. Consider requirements found in Chapters 7 and 8 of your textbook as well as any supplemental resources.

Write the contract draft in a 2– pages Microsoft Word document. Submit the contract draft to the Discussion Area by Monday, February 1, 2016.

By Wednesday, February 3, 2016, review the contract drafts submitted by at least two classmates. Provide a balanced feedback, addressing the inclusion or absence of relevant clauses. Analyze any questionable legal issues that may arise as a result of this contract. Evaluate how cultural differences may affect your negotiations.

All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

 

 

 

Assignment 3: Research Paper

 

International Sales and Contracts

Using the research from the discussion assignment and other information you have obtained through readings, prepare a report that addresses the laws related to international sales and contracts. Be sure to address how each of the three countries you have selected handles these issues. Analyze the major differences among the countries. Evaluate the clauses that are most important for inclusion in international contracts. In addition, evaluate how culture, ethics, and e-commerce apply to contracts and sales.

Make note of any pending regulations or laws that could affect your company in the future.

In drafting your paper, consider the following topics.

  • International contract law: General
  • International contract law related to the three countries selected
  • Negotiation of sales and contracts
  • International sales laws
  • Warranty standards
  • Breach of contract
  • Interpretation of contracts

Write a 2– pages paper in a Microsoft Word document about your research on international contracts and sales. Include links, references, and sources you have used and follow the proper guidelines for citing legal texts. submit it to the Discussion Area by Wednesday, February 3

All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

Describe how you would use the SHRM HR Competency Model to respond to the business trends, issues, and opportunities identified.

For this assignment, review and describe the nine competency domains listed in the “HR Competency Model Unveiled” article linked in the Resources. Use the Capella University Library to research current business trends, issues, and opportunities in human capital management that are relevant for your organization and industry. If you are not currently employed at an organization, select a similar one about which you will be able to find sufficient information in order to complete this assignment. You might also use an organization where you were formerly employed.

In a 2–3-page paper, complete the following:

  • Describe the role of the HRM professional in human capital management.
  • Describe the SHRM HR Competency Model.
  • Identify and describe current business trends, issues, and opportunities, and their applicability to your organization.
  • Describe how you would use the SHRM HR Competency Model to respond to the business trends, issues, and opportunities identified.
  • Assess yourself as an HRM professional against the SHRM HR Competency Model.

Format your paper according to APA standards, including the following:

  • A title page.
  • An abstract.
  • Proper page margins, spacing, and page numbers.
  • Appropriate headings and subheadings.
  • Citations.
  • A reference list.

 

 

http://www.shrm.org/about/news/pages/hrcompetencymodelunveiled.aspx

Discuss the most appropriate form of ownership for your new business (assuming your current financial situation).

1.Select a small business that you visit often (e.g., coffee shop, bookstore, sporting goods store, etc.). Write a 6-8 page paper in which you:

 

1.       Craft a brief (1-2 pages) strategy for a business concept that would directly compete with the small business you selected. Explain the rationale for the strategy in detail.

 

2.       Determine if it would make more sense to open the new business you describe or to purchase the existing business you selected. Explain your reasoning.

 

3.       Discuss the most appropriate form of ownership for your new business (assuming your current financial situation).

 

4.       Outline a business plan for your business. Visit http://www.sba.gov for tools and templates.

 

5.       Include at least two (2) references outside the textbook.

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

·         Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

 

·         Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

 

 

2. Referring to the same business you either started or purchased in the first assignment, write a 6-8 page paper in which you:

 

Outline a financial plan for your small business. Develop a guerrilla marketing strategy for your small business. Discuss the most appropriate location for a second store (an actual street address). Explain your reasoning. Outline a plan for securing sources of debt financing for your second store. Include at least two (2) references outside the textbook.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page lengt

Highlights what is needed to ascertain the Measurable Organizational Value (MOV) of this project.

Consider the following scenario:

You have been hired by a large company with branch offices around the country to assist with rollout of a new companywide compliance system.

While initially the focus was on implementation of the technology, it was found that success will require at least 10 hours of training over two days for all managers across the country on both the use of the new platform as well as a host of new compliance policies being introduced.

Of the options discussed, it was generally agreed that the training should be hands-on and conducted in-person at a central location. This will obviously require getting organizational buy-in as not all managers are going to be willing to commit to taking time out from their normal responsibilities just for some training.

In addition, such large scale centralized training has not been done before by this company; therefore, the CEO wants feedback from participants to evaluate the effectiveness of any training sessions.

As a result, your manager has given you the responsibility to develop an outline for a proposed project that would meet this upcoming need for arranging and conducting a two-day training session.

This scenario will continue throughout the first three weeks with all weeks being submitted along with the Week 3 assignment. You are expected to apply any feedback provided by the instructor to these finalized documents.

Submit a 2- to 3-page memo that includes the following:

  • Names the project
  • Briefly describes the project
  • Identifies potential stakeholders directly or indirectly involved
  • Specifies the overall objective and any outcomes for this project
  • Details how success will be evaluated
  • Highlights what is needed to ascertain the Measurable Organizational Value (MOV) of this project.

You will need to make some assumptions (it is even encouraged), but the assumptions must be documented

Compare international perspectives on corrections and criminal punishment, including comparative sentencing typologies.

Due Week 6 and worth 250 points

 

 

 

Use the Internet to research criminal proceedings in one (1) of the six (6) model countries from the textbook. Imagine you are traveling abroad in your chosen country when you witness a local national committing a violent assault. The criminal is arrested and charged by the police.

 

 

 

Upon returning to the United States, a professor in one of your criminal justice classes asks you to complete a written report on your experience.

 

 

 

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

 

  1. Determine the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.
  2. Examine the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Provide a rationale for the response.
  3. Choose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and analyze the country’s perspective on each right. Provide support for the analysis.
  4. Investigate the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Provide justification for the response.
  5. Classify the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.
  6. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

  • Compare and contrast American perspectives on criminal law with those of other countries.
  • Evaluate the nature of comparative policing and global law enforcement cooperation.
  • Analyze the role of procedural law in the four (4) major legal traditions.

 

  • Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

 

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 250 Assignment 2: International Crime Witness, Part 1
Criteria  

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Determine the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Insufficiently determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Partially determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Satisfactorily determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Thoroughly determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.
2. Examine the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Provide a rationale for the response.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Did not submit or insufficiently provided a rationale for the response. Insufficiently examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Insufficiently provided a rationale for the response. Partially examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Partially provided a rationale for the response. Satisfactorily examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for the response. Thoroughly examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Thoroughly provided a rationale for the response.
3. Choose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and analyze the country’s perspective on each right. Provide support for the analysis.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and did not submit or incompletely analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the analysis. Insufficiently chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and insufficiently analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Insufficiently provided support for the analysis. Partially chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and partially analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Partially provided support for the analysis. Satisfactorily chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and satisfactorily analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Satisfactorily provided support for the analysis. Thoroughly chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and thoroughly analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Thoroughly provided support for the analysis.
4. Investigate the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Provide justification for the response.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for the response. Insufficiently investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Insufficiently provided justification for the response. Partially investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Partially provided justification for the response. Satisfactorily investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Satisfactorily provided justification for the response. Thoroughly investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Thoroughly provided justification for the response.
5. Classify the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Insufficiently classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Partially classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Satisfactorily classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Thoroughly classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.
6. 4 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

 

 

 

Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2

 

Due Week 8 and worth 250 points

 

 

 

After providing your report to the professor in Assignment 2, the country’s governing body asks you to return to the country and testify in the court proceedings. While you are abroad, your professor asks you to report on the court proceedings and correctional system.

 

 

 

Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research court proceedings and the correctional system in the same country you selected in Assignment 2.

 

 

 

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

 

  1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.
  2. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
  3. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
  4. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations.
  5. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

  • Evaluate and explain ethical issues inherent in criminal justice systems.
  • Differentiate the role of courts in various societies and in international context.
  • Compare international perspectives on corrections and criminal punishment, including comparative sentencing typologies.

 

  • Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

 

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 250 Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2
Criteria  

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.

Weight: 23%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the analysis. Insufficiently analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Insufficiently provided support for the analysis. Partially analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Partially provided support for the analysis. Satisfactorily analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Satisfactorily provided support for the analysis. Thoroughly analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Thoroughly provided support for the analysis.
2. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system.

Weight: 22%

Did not submit or incompletely depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Insufficiently depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Insufficiently provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Partially depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Partially provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Satisfactorily depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Satisfactorily provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Thoroughly depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Thoroughly provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
3. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Insufficiently exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Partially exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Satisfactorily exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Thoroughly exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
4. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for the recommendations. Insufficiently provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Insufficiently provided justification for the recommendations. Partially provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Partially provided justification for the recommendations. Satisfactorily provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Satisfactorily provided justification for the recommendations. Thoroughly provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Thoroughly provided justification for the r

Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings.

Due Week 6 and worth 250 points

 

 

 

Use the Internet to research criminal proceedings in one (1) of the six (6) model countries from the textbook. Imagine you are traveling abroad in your chosen country when you witness a local national committing a violent assault. The criminal is arrested and charged by the police.

 

 

 

Upon returning to the United States, a professor in one of your criminal justice classes asks you to complete a written report on your experience.

 

 

 

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

 

  1. Determine the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.
  2. Examine the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Provide a rationale for the response.
  3. Choose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and analyze the country’s perspective on each right. Provide support for the analysis.
  4. Investigate the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Provide justification for the response.
  5. Classify the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.
  6. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

  • Compare and contrast American perspectives on criminal law with those of other countries.
  • Evaluate the nature of comparative policing and global law enforcement cooperation.
  • Analyze the role of procedural law in the four (4) major legal traditions.

 

  • Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

 

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 250 Assignment 2: International Crime Witness, Part 1
Criteria  

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Determine the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Insufficiently determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Partially determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Satisfactorily determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Thoroughly determined the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country.
2. Examine the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Provide a rationale for the response.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Did not submit or insufficiently provided a rationale for the response. Insufficiently examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Insufficiently provided a rationale for the response. Partially examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Partially provided a rationale for the response. Satisfactorily examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for the response. Thoroughly examined the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Thoroughly provided a rationale for the response.
3. Choose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and analyze the country’s perspective on each right. Provide support for the analysis.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and did not submit or incompletely analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the analysis. Insufficiently chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and insufficiently analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Insufficiently provided support for the analysis. Partially chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and partially analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Partially provided support for the analysis. Satisfactorily chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and satisfactorily analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Satisfactorily provided support for the analysis. Thoroughly chose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and thoroughly analyzed the country’s perspective on each right. Thoroughly provided support for the analysis.
4. Investigate the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Provide justification for the response.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for the response. Insufficiently investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Insufficiently provided justification for the response. Partially investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Partially provided justification for the response. Satisfactorily investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Satisfactorily provided justification for the response. Thoroughly investigated the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Thoroughly provided justification for the response.
5. Classify the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.

Weight: 17%

Did not submit or incompletely classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Insufficiently classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Partially classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Satisfactorily classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Thoroughly classified the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States.
6. 4 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present 7-8 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

 

 

 

Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2

 

Due Week 8 and worth 250 points

 

 

 

After providing your report to the professor in Assignment 2, the country’s governing body asks you to return to the country and testify in the court proceedings. While you are abroad, your professor asks you to report on the court proceedings and correctional system.

 

 

 

Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research court proceedings and the correctional system in the same country you selected in Assignment 2.

 

 

 

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

 

  1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.
  2. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
  3. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
  4. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations.
  5. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

  • Evaluate and explain ethical issues inherent in criminal justice systems.
  • Differentiate the role of courts in various societies and in international context.
  • Compare international perspectives on corrections and criminal punishment, including comparative sentencing typologies.

 

  • Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice.
  • Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

 

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 250 Assignment 3: International Crime Witness, Part 2
Criteria  

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.

Weight: 23%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for the analysis. Insufficiently analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Insufficiently provided support for the analysis. Partially analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Partially provided support for the analysis. Satisfactorily analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Satisfactorily provided support for the analysis. Thoroughly analyzed both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Thoroughly provided support for the analysis.
2. Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system.

Weight: 22%

Did not submit or incompletely depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Insufficiently depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Insufficiently provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Partially depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Partially provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Satisfactorily depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Satisfactorily provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system. Thoroughly depicted the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Thoroughly provided justification for your view of the country’s prison system.
3. Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Insufficiently exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Partially exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Satisfactorily exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems. Thoroughly exposed two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.
4. Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Did not submit or incompletely provided justification for the recommendations. Insufficiently provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Insufficiently provided justification for the recommendations. Partially provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Partially provided justification for the recommendations. Satisfactorily provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Satisfactorily provided justification for the recommendations. Thoroughly provided one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Thoroughly provided justification for the r