Discuss whether the sources are relevant and reliable, as well as whether they are used appropriately and effectively integrated.

Description: After you have read the draft provided, please respond to each of the following prompts as specifically as possible, using detailed examples and select passages from the draft you have read to illustrate your points and validate claims about that draft. Your response to each set of questions should be at least 100 words in length, for a total of 300 words for each critique. YOU WILL BE CRITIQUING TWO DIFFERENT ESSAYS (keep them separate).
Identify the writers thesis and then evaluate it for effectiveness. Discuss whether the thesis is specific enough and of appropriate scope for this argument. Explain why or why not and provide suggestions for the writer to help improve the thesis, if the thesis is ineffective.
How has the writer structured the argument? Explain in detail whether or not the support for the argument is presented in a logical and persuasive way and whether or not the counterarguments are realistic. Discuss any stronger counterarguments that the writer will need to rebut, if any.
Examine the use of the source material. Discuss whether the sources are relevant and reliable, as well as whether they are used appropriately and effectively integrated. Explain to the writer how selecting or integrating sources in a different way might improve the argument, providing examples of revised versions of introducing, integrating, and commenting on source materials.

The textbook if necessary: FIRST-YEAR WRITING, WRITING IN THE DISCIPLINES, NINTH CUSTOM EDITION, PEARSON

Attention, Please note that you are not supposed to upload any files with additional pages (extra instructions) until Administration informs you on the payment receipt.