Facility Management
Depending on the availability of venues where events such as weddings, political rallies, cultural events, fund raising, and religious events can be held, a sports facility can be used to host a number of events. However, one of the hugest concerns about setting objectives for events that can be held in a sport facility involves events that are financially or socially beneficial but contradict the original sport facility’s mission. Mainly, this has to do with events that are socially, culturally, or politically motivated, and may raise issues in the community.
Basically, a sports facility’s mission is offering programs, facilities, and services whose aim is addressing leisure, recreational, and physical pursuit within the community. According to Nutt (2000), sports facilities aim at emphasizing on knowledge increment on physical fitness and wellness, participation, and advocating for healthy lifestyle behaviors. In this regard, the community members are guaranteed the best affordable recreational learning opportunities on a daily basis. This is achieved through excellent experiences, services, programs, and facilities.
Through the provision of quality facilities, services, equipment, and programs that promote participatory recreational experiences and teach youths ways through which they can adopt healthy lifestyle behaviors, sports facilities help in nurturing talents. As a result, parents in the community feel safe and assured that when their youths go to the sports facility, they are participating in positive activities that will contribute to their fitness, wellbeing, and health. On the same note, community members are more likely to take action if called to contribute towards renovation or purchase of new facilities. This is founded on the fact that they are aware of the benefits the youths derive from the sports facility.
One of the events that is likely to bring about controversies when held in the sports facilities is political rallies (Teicholz & Techolz, 2001). Basically, political rallies aim at advancing for specific policy agenda or policies, ensuring that alternative policies are not adopted, and supporting some chosen individuals to power positions within a wider political world or organization. A few people play key roles, lead the activities, have the prominent voice, and act like magnets in attracting people. It is, therefore, evident that political rallies’ aims are entirely against the mission of sports facilities.
If a political rally is held in a sports facility, this implies that youths and all other people who use the facility for different physical fitness purposes will miss out a day or several days. This will give the political organizers a chance to put posters and plan for the political rally. Through this, the sports facility will be deviating from its original purpose (Teicholz & Techolz, 2001). The community members and all those who contributed towards the construction and betterment of the sports facility may feel provoked if they have no interest in the political rally. These feelings may even result to physical fights where the community members join hands to ruin or chase the politicians away.
Facility ownership
The owners of the facility are likely to argue that the political rally is a principal diversion from the sports facility’s mission. Rather than promoting leadership development which is one of the principal aims of the sports facility, the political rally denies youths the opportunity to nurture this (Langston & Too, 2009). On the contrary, the political rally organizers may use the youths to put up posters and run some other political activities. The facility ownership may also argue that by allowing a political rally to be held in the facility, other event holders including fundraisers, cultural events organizers, and religious event holders may request for an opportunity to hold their events in the facility. If denied the chance, this can create enmity and fights. So as to avoid this, the facility ownership would recommend that the sports facility be used for its original purpose.
Community
The community would mainly ask questions related to the safety of their youths, them being misused, and the general security of the community (Langston & Too, 2009). The main community member’s worry is that the youths may end up being used inappropriately as the politicians try to fulfill their mission. In this regards, youths may be given money so as to push for improper agendas such as destroying the vehicles of opponents or ruining the opponent’s rallies. This is besides campaigning for the politicians. This implies that the youths would generally deviate from their daily activities and focus more on political rallies where they get some money. Some politicians even go the extent of buying youths liquor so as to win them over. After getting the money, some youths may engage in activities such as drug abuse (Chotipanich, 2004). The community members may also raise issues to do with the safety of their community. Political rallies are normally associated with chaos and the community may suffer as well.
Answers and justifying the event
In answer to the community members’ and facility ownerships’ concern, I would assert that the sports facility should also aim at bringing people together. Since the sports facility is a community resource, it can be used to reach out to people while promoting dignity and civility. One of the ways through which relationships can be developed and maintained in the community is through allowing accountable politicians to hold rallies. Politicians can also contribute towards community growth by funding the youths’ activities and purchasing new facilities. Moreover, politicians can help in organizing and funding competitions with neighboring communities.
References
Chotipanich, S. (2004). Positioning facility management. Facilities, 22(13/14), 364-372.
Langston, C. A., & Too, L. (2009). Event-based facilities management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Nutt, B. (2000). Four competing futures for facility management. Facilities, 18(3/4), 124-132.
Teicholz, E., & Techolz, E. (2001). Facility design and management handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]