Author: Best Writer

As a future graduate, you will need to make the decision upon what is best for you and your family, as far as career opportunities and where you want to make your home. Before beginning, have two places in mind that you might want to live.

Assignment Question

As a future graduate, you will need to make the decision upon what is best for you and your family, as far as career opportunities and where you want to make your home. Before beginning, have two places in mind that you might want to live (one may be your current state).

First, come up with three themes that you would want to consider before making a move, then research each of them for the two states you would consider. (One could be California or they could both be other states).

It is up to you which themes you would choose to compare/contrast. You will likely want to look at the economics of the states, which may include things such as your career field’s average wage, the job market for that field, the cost of living in the state, etc.

Here are a few sites that you may wish to look at for financial information, but feel free to use other, instead or as well: My Next Move Rankings: Affordability – Cost of Living by State (usnews.com) Here are some suggestions of other themes you might personally want to compare/contrast among the two states: extended family/friends, cultural opportunities available, professional sports teams, crime, climate (weather), politics, educational opportunities, housing, job opportunities for your spouse/children, etc. This resource will help you organize your writing.

Use the CARS checklist in the template to help you determine if a resource should be used for this paper.

You will need to put 3 resources in a work’s cited page following APA format, as well as use in-text citations for any quoted or paraphrased facts. If you find your source to be reliable, take notes and add it to your APA formatted work’s cited page.

Make sure to use in-text citations when you mention any facts quoted or put in your own words from each source.

Remember, if you have questions regarding the APA format, you may use the tutorial on the homepage, consult your test, ask your faculty, or refer to this page: APA Style Introduction – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University. This remains a 4-5 paragraph writing, depending upon the pattern of organization you choose, and is completely doable.

Pick one out of 4 countries, do research on the economy of the country try and apply the H-O model or the economies of scale model.

Assignment Question

SO out of 4 countries you are supposed to pick one, do research on the economy of the country try and apply the H-O model or the economies of scale model. Then come up to negotiate about with the other countries involved.

So in this case you are the EU but for simplicity you can focus on one or 2 countries, Countries you are trading with are Brazil, US, and China. The paper should be about 7 pages 12 times roman and double spaced. Find good sources and site them the chicago paranthesis way.

How did the widespread consumption of bread accelerate the growth of the civilization of these two locations?

Assignment Question

Research Question: The Agricultural Revolution hit different parts of the world at different times. Looking at bread as a symbol of measuring the development of civilization, what were the conditions that allowed for bread to be present in Egypt before the Near East societies? How did the widespread consumption of bread accelerate the growth of the civilization of these two locations?

This is a research paper about an archeology and environment themed class. The case study of this essay is the Near East societies that lived in the Fertile Cresent and Ancient Egypt during the Agricultural Revolution. We need to analyze it through three theoretical frameworks: water management, climate change, and human environment interactions. Try to use archeoogical evidence.

Follow the structure on the outline below:

Introduction: (300 words) Some background information on the Agricultural revolution which is the same as the neolithic revolution. Talk about the invention of bread in these societies. Explain why this topic is worth investigating and what is the methodology that is going to be used in the analysis.

Literature Review (500 words): Based on the sources provide below and the sources that you find, write a literature review discussing what current research says about this topic and what are some limitations that will make writing this essay hard.

Body Paragraph 1 (600 words): Water Management Below is the main idea of this paragraph, find proper evidence and research that support these claims and make a thourough analysis that supports the thesis that you will choose to be best.

Body Paragraph 2 (600 words): Climate change These two regions faced different climatic conditions during the neolithic revolution. Each society reacted in their own way. One of the main challenges that these prehistoric societies faced was the seasonality of rain and fluctuating temperatures. Explore how these societies reacted to their climate conditions. Explain what climatic conditions they faced prior to the invention of bread in their communities

Body Paragraph 3 (600 words): Changes in Demographics Compare the Near Eastern & Ancient Egyptian societies and the structure of employment prior and after the invention of bread. Explore how prior to the invention of bread, there were male hunter gatheres while women dealt with textiles. Explain how men became farmers and women became crushers of grain. Explain how this differed from Egypt to the Near East. Use archeological evidence.

Conclusion (300 words): Conclude this essay and talk about some limitations of this study.

Research proposal: Ensure that your introduction clearly states the research question or problem you’re addressing. You mention investigating “transnational relationships,” but the text doesn’t immediately convey the focus on bread and cereal products. Include a clear thesis statement that encapsulates the main argument or contribution of your research. What do you aim to prove or discover through this investigation? Emphasize how the study of bread and cereal production is relevant to understanding transnational relationships. Draw explicit connections between your topic and its broader implications for the evolution of civilizations.

Choose a topic that deals with an ethical issue in technology Discuss opposing position(s) to show understanding of the entire issue

Assignment Question

Choose the topic Ethical Implications of White, Grey, and Black Hat Hacking but if theres another topic in that list that is easier you can change it. You will select a term paper topic that applies to something covered in this semester in regards to ethics and information technology. Identify the position or side for your selected topic and present potential ethical issues/problems. Your paper must have the topic and position explicitly articulated in your paper’s introduction. In the paper, you must: Clearly state the topic and position in the introduction Clearly state the thesis of the paper in the introduction Restate the topic and argument in the conclusion Choose a topic that deals with an ethical issue in technology Discuss opposing position(s) to show understanding of the entire issue Use correct spelling and grammar throughout the paper. Cover the following in the body of the paper Identify, comprehend, and resolve ethical issues/problems and their ramifications in a thorough and responsible manner Describe the historical and cultural contexts of the issue Determine any legal issues associated with the case study Requirements for the paper are as follows: Format of the document: APA Format Double spaced, 12 pt Times New Roman 1″ margins References page properly formatted The submitted document must have a .docx, .doc or .pdf extension and an appropriate name. Your TA or Instructor must be able to open your submission. If you are concerned about this, please make sure to submit a PDF The paper must be at least 1500 words.

Title Page and References DO NOT count towards the number of words. A minimum of 4 references should be cited in-text and included in the References section. One can be the textbook CHOOSING A TOPIC The following list of preapproved topics should provide a starting point. Remember, each paper should discuss a topic and an ethical issue specifically relating to information technology. The following topics closely follow the text and presentations from this semester: Ethical Implications of Whistle-Blowing (Ch.2) Software and Digital Media Piracy (Ch.2) Ethical Implications of White, Grey, and Black Hat Hacking (Ch.3) The Patriot Act and Data Collection to Combat Terrorism (Ch.3/Ch.4) The Current USA Freedom Act and Private Data Collection (Ch.4) Personal Data Privacy Regulations Around the World i.e. GDPR (Ch.4) Consumer Profiling Activities (Ch.4) Employer Workplace Monitoring (Ch.4) Free Speech and Anonymity on the Internet (Ch.5) Section 230 and the Protections for ISPs (Ch.5) The Use of DMCA and its Protections (Ch.5) SLAPP Lawsuits (Ch.5) The Role of the Internet and Fake News (Ch.5) Intellectual Property Laws in the US and Small Businesses (Ch.6) Nondisclosure and Noncompete Employment Contracts (Ch.6) Reverse Engineering and the Freedom to Tinker (Ch.6) Open Source Coding Ethics (Ch.6) The Cost of Quality Technology (Ch.7) Safety Critical Systems and Applications (Ch.7) Productivity in the Information Age (Ch.8) The Dawn of Artificial Intelligence (Ch.8) The Impact of Technology of Healthcare and Medicine (Ch.8) Social Media Marketing Ethics (Ch.9) Cyberabuse, Cyberbullying, and/or Cyberstalking (Ch.9) Responsibility of Social Media to Prevent Inappropriate Materials (Ch.9) The Use of H1-B Workers by US Technology Companies (Ch.10) Offshore Outsourcing of Technical Jobs (Ch.10) The Progression and Impact of Green Computing (Ch.10) The following are more general topics that will leverage what we’ve learned this semester Autonomous Cars Cyberwarefare: The Future of War Biometric Identification Digital Health Information and HIPAA Internet in Schools Computer Usage in the Criminal Justice System Deep Packet Inspection Identity Theft Remember, you should choose a topic and ask an ethical question within that topic as the basis of your paper. Remember to address all of the points below and discuss the other side of the issue as well. Ethical issues Legal issues Historical/Cultural issues Message from teacher: This is a summary of frequently asked questions about the term paper and lessons learned from previous semesters.

Focus and method (Strands: Topic, Research question, Methodology) The student should identify an issue (topic) of global significance and examine it through one or more local manifestations

Assignment Question

World Studies Extended Essays (IB diploma program ) MUST fall within one of the following six categories: Science, technology and society. Culture, language and identity. Conflict, peace and security. Equality and inequality. Health and development. Environmental and/or economic sustainability. The chosen topic for the World Studies Extended Essay (WSEE) must address both a local and a global issue of significance, and invite an interdisciplinary approach, meaning that two approved IB subjects should be used as an interdisciplinary critical lens to answer the research question. The most successful topics reveal connections between specific and/or local places, people, phenomena or experiences, and the larger global framework in which they take place ( the subjects that i do for my IB diploma are ESS, english A, maths (SL), for (HL)subjects Business and management , Art and Spanish, so you can choose what two subjects will correlate with the reaserch question, which you can change of course, the import think is that it falls into the critieria which is written below ) The important think is also that essay includes syllabus from these two subjects. IB extended essay must fall into these critieria:

Criterion A: Focus and method (Strands: Topic, Research question, Methodology) The student should identify an issue (topic) of global significance and examine it through one or more local manifestations. The significance and importance of the global issue must be established in the introduction (this might take rather longer than in other subjects). In this way the issue is accurately and effectively communicated. The research question should appropriately connect the global issue to the local manifestation. Early in the essay, students should: explain or justify their research question identify the IB academic disciplines and appropriate key concepts they are going to use explain why the research question requires an interdisciplinary approach and indicate the benefits of an integrative approach highlight the materials, sources, data and evidence from the two subjects they will be using, with some explanation of why they have been chosen. Students must show clearly that they have chosen a suitable range of relevant sources. These could be primary or secondary. Primary sources include: works of art film music interviews self-generated survey data reports of experiments. Secondary sources should be capable of conveying academic context or be susceptible to academic evaluation, though journalistic, online and media sources are permitted. Students’ sources must provide sufficient evidence to develop and support arguments that are relevant to the research question. If the topic or research question is deemed inappropriate for the subject in which the essay is registered, no more than four marks can be awarded for this criterion. This applies to WSEE essays where the issue is not contemporary. (“Contemporary” is defined here as an issue that is relevant during the student’s lifetime.) Criterion B: Knowledge and understanding (Strands: Context, Subject-specific terminology and concepts)

Students should select concepts, theories, perspectives, findings or examples from two Diploma Programme subjects. They need to demonstrate a sound grasp of: the knowledge bases of the different subjects modes of understanding of the different subjects methods of communication of the different subjects. Students should demonstrate familiarity with the terminology and usages of the subjects. They should place the issue in academic context and where possible indicate the limitations of individual subjects in terms of considering the issue. The award of achievement levels of 2 or above requires evidence that two subjects have been used in the essay. Higher levels (3 or 4) require increasingly explicit awareness of the strengths and limitations of the individual subject concepts or ideas. Students should show that they understand the conceptual framework of both subjects, even of one they are not studying for the Diploma Programme. For example, if a student is using history to explore an issue, they must use the skills of the historian such as establishing causation, partiality, reliability of sources etc. Simple narrative is never enough. Use of language must be effective and include terminology and concepts relevant to the issue and subjects under study. Students should define contested or ambiguous terms when necessary. The essay should be accessible and acceptable to audiences from the different subjects being integrated. If the topic or research question is deemed inappropriate for the subject in which the essay is registered, no more than four marks can be awarded for this criterion. This applies to WSEE essays where the issue is not contemporary. (“Contemporary” is defined here as an issue that is relevant during the student’s lifetime.)

Criterion C: Critical thinking (Strands: Research, Analysis and Discussion and evaluation) Research can incorporate the methodologies of the two subjects chosen, such as: experimental laboratory work library and online research generation of primary data through questionnaires or many others. Research should be undertaken with the same integrity as within individual subjects. It must be relevant to the research question. Students should address the value and limitations of research materials. Students should analyse and evaluate their evidence in a manner appropriate to the research question and the Diploma Programme subjects employed in the essay. Students should present their ideas in the form of a logical and coherent argument that is relevant to the research question. The argument should be substantiated with evidence and examples. Straightforward descriptive or narrative accounts that lack analysis do not usually advance an argument and should be avoided. Successful interdisciplinary essays require an integrative argument or explanation—that is, the different subjects should be coherently brought together to address the question through, for example: a complex causal explanation a leading metaphor a model an analogy. At the highest level, students should demonstrate: effective and nuanced analysis and evaluation of information and findings evaluation of the success and limitations of their own integrative approach to the issue. In a world studies EE there is an element of risk: it may be that evaluation of the findings of a two-subject approach leads to new and original conclusions, or that conclusions are uncertain, or that it is not possible to make conclusions. Failure to integrate the two subjects’ analyses into the conclusion or to reach a firm conclusion will not prevent the award of high marks: no news is still news so long as it is true to the research question. Indeed, such outcomes can be used to review opportunities for further research and research lessons learned. If the topic or research question is deemed inappropriate for the subject in which the essay is registered, no more than three marks can be awarded for this criterion. This applies to WSEE essays where the issue is not contemporary. (“Contemporary” is defined here as an issue that is relevant during the student’s lifetime.)

Criterion D: Presentation (Strands: Structure, Layout) This criterion assesses the extent to which the presentation follows the standard format expected for academic writing and the extent to which this aids effective communication. Students may provide a section and subsection structure to their essays, with informative headings, if appropriate to the topic of the essay. Subheadings should not distract from the overall structure of the essay. Use of charts, images and tables Any charts, images or tables from literature sources included in the essay must be carefully selected and labelled. They should only be used if they: are directly relevant to the research question contribute towards the understanding of the argument are of a good graphic quality. Large tables of raw data collected by the student are best included in an appendix, where they should be carefully labelled. It is not necessary to include all responses to questionnaires; a single sample is sufficient. Tables of processed data should be designed to clearly display the information in the most appropriate form. Graphs or charts drawn from the analysed data should be selected to highlight only the most pertinent aspects related to the argument. Too many graphs, charts and tables will detract from the overall quality of the communication. Only processed data that is central to the argument of the essay should be included in the body of the essay, as close as possible to its first reference. The inclusion of non-relevant or superfluous material will not be rewarded and may actually detract from the argument. Any tables should enhance a written explanation and should not themselves include significant bodies of text. If they do, then these words must be included in the word count. Students must take care in their use of appendices as examiners are not required to read them. All information with direct relevance to the analysis, discussion and evaluation of the essay must be contained in the main body of the essay. A bibliography is an essential structural element, contributing as far as it is visually presented, to criterion D, in addition to the other presentation requirements: title page, table of contents, page numbers, and so on. While there is no explicit penalty in criterion D for exceeding 4,000 words, students should be aware that examiners will not read beyond the 4,000-word limit, therefore affecting the application of multiple criteria. Criterion D specifically may be impacted if, in exceeding 4,000 words, one of the structural requirements of the essay (for example, the conclusion, or important illustrative material) is unassessed by the examiner because he or she is not required to read beyond 4,000 words. Any material that is not original must be carefully acknowledged, with specific attention paid to the acknowledgement and referencing of quotes and ideas. This acknowledgment and referencing is applicable to audiovisual material, text, graphs and data published in print and electronic sources. If the referencing does not meet the minimum standard as indicated in the guide (name of author, date of publication, title of source and page numbers, as applicable), and is not consistently applied, work will be considered as a case of possible academic misconduct. Incomplete references and those that do not meet the minimum requirements as detailed in the Effective citing and referencing document are not penalized in criterion D, but examiners are required to alert the IB to candidates who overlook these minimum requirements, for further investigation. Criterion D assesses references and bibliography purely on how they are presented (for example, consistent, laid out in an appropriate academic manner). Criterion E: Engagement (Strands: Reflections on planning and progress) This criterion assesses the student’s engagement with their research focus and the research process. It will be applied by the examiner at the end of the assessment of the essay, and is based solely on the candidate’s reflections as detailed on the RPPF, with the supervisory comments and extended essay itself as context. Students are expected to provide reflections on the decision-making and planning process undertaken in completing the essay. Students must demonstrate how they arrived at a topic as well as the methods and approach used. This criterion assesses the extent to which a student has evidenced the rationale for decisions made throughout the planning process and the skills and understandings developed. For example, students may reflect on: the approach and strategies they chose, and their relative success the Approaches to learning skills they have developed and their effect on the student as a learner how their conceptual understandings have developed or changed as a result of their research challenges they faced in their research and how they overcame these questions that emerged as a result of their research what they would do differently if they were to undertake the research again. Effective reflection highlights the journey the student has engaged in through the EE process. Students must show evidence of critical and reflective thinking that goes beyond simply describing the procedures that have been followed. The reflections must provide the examiner with an insight into student thinking, creativity and originality within the research process. The student voice must be clearly present and demonstrate the learning that has taken place. That’s pretty much it. I wrote the research question above but you can always change it, the important think is that its from world studies, the numer of the sources required is also not official but if should not exceed 10 supported documents. In the intenet you can find many examples like on classify etc. Regarding the format

Read the following first hand accounts of the Battle of Little Bighorn. Here are the accounts to read: Little Bighorn Battle Coverage: The Louisiana DemocratLinks to an external site-Which two articles do you find to be the most accurate, and why?

Assignment Question

For your first primary assignment, you need to read the following first hand accounts of the Battle of Little Bighorn. Here are the accounts to read: Little Bighorn Battle Coverage: The Louisiana DemocratLinks to an external site.. (Alexandria, La.), July 12, 1876 https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82003389/1876-07-12/ed-1/seq-2/?date1=1876&index=2&date2=1876&searchType=basic&sort=date&state=&rows=20&proxtext=custer+dead&y=0&x=0&dateFilterType=yearRange#words=dead%2BCuster “Sitting Bull Tells the Story of the Fight”Links to an external site. New York Times (May 7, 1881) https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1881/05/07/98555099.pdf Little Bighorn Battle Coverage: The Anderson IntelligencerLinks to an external site.. (Anderson Court House, S.C.), July 13, 1876 “Gall’s account of The Battle of the Little Bighorn”Links to an external site. St. Paul (Minn.) Pioneer Press (July 18, 1886) Then answer the question: Which two articles do you find to be the most accurate, and why? Your answer must be at least 250 words, and properly formatted.

Explain the context in which an issue occurs within an organization.

For this journal, you will outline the process for proposing a communication strategy that fosters change and innovation in an organization. Address the following questions when outlining the process: Explain the context in which an issue occurs within an organization. Develop a solution that will solve the organizational issue and meet the needs of the people involved. Consider how social media can be leveraged to improve organizational public relations. Include a potential audience analysis. Use Neal’s (2020) communications questions, which are listed below. What am I trying to achieve? How will my audience react to what I am trying to achieve? Will my message be resisted? What do I know about my audience that will help me tailor my message? Identify a channel to gain feedback. Your journal should consist of a minimum of 3 well-constructed paragraphs. Sources used, if any, should be listed and formatted in APA.